Consistent and Modestly Ambitious

Dear Academy Families,

Last week I had the pleasure of attending the National Association of Independent Schools (NAIS) annual conference, held this year in Philadelphia, with 5,000 of my closest friends and colleagues…! The keynote speakers included Jim Collins (Good to GreatGreat by Choice), who stressed that his research pointed to a couple key differences between “good” and “great” communities: the first is being consistent in one’s goals (what he called adhering to a “20 mile march, day in, day out”); and the second is having the humility to temper ambitious energy. When I think of applying this to the Academy, I am reminded how fortunate we are to have such a straight-forward mission that we have pursued over our 20 years without distraction: taking advantage of being embedded in a world-class research university; instilling the foundations of a classical education; and being a caring community. This balance of these ambitious yet modest factors, combined with our unswerving adherence to them, absolutely meets Jim Collins’ criteria for a great institution.  More importantly, our students and faculty represent this same balance of modesty and ambition, with consistent adherence to our high goals.

In the spirit of our consistent-and-modestly-ambitious mission, I want to remind you of the upcoming spring gala in April, at which we will be celebrating the Academy’s 20thanniversary! Please go to our website for details and to purchase tickets…today!

My best wishes to you all for a great spring break, during which I hope everyone gets some well deserved rest and recreation.

Warm regards,
James S. Berkman
Head of School

 

Flame-Breathing Sparkle Dragons

| FROM ACADEMY PRESS | BY VICTOR ORLOV | MARCH, 2013 |

Question: what do bow ties, nuclear arms, and middle school students have in common?

Answer: all were present (some figuratively) at our first-ever middle school Model UN conference, run by BUA’s own Model UN delegation.

Bright and early on the morning of February 2nd, 150 eager 6th-through-8th graders converged upon the halls and classrooms of the Academy to tackle serious issues like nuclear proliferation in the Korean peninsula, unrest in the Kashmir region, and the ongoing slaughter in the Syrian Arab Republic. Much to our (rather pleasant) surprise, these students had done extensive research and had given some serious thought to the topics they were to debate. The energy throughout our building was absolutely incredible, and the professionalism and cheer of the Academy students running the event rivaled that of college-level conferences such as BosMUN and BUSUN, hosted by BU and Brown, respectively.

Some of the finer moments from the weekend:

  • Rachel Demma encouraged her delegates to write the remainder of her thesis (Rachel’s committee was a reinterpretation of the 1968 Democratic National Convention, something that is a major part of her Senior Thesis).
  • Phill Giliver was voted “least favorite staff member” in at least 3 separate committees, an honor Phill has never yet received. Phill was also given the moniker “Phill the Exterminator” from a particularly loving delegate.
  • Embarrassed at not being in vogue with conference attire, Dr. Horn (our keynote speaker) was forced to don a bow tie before getting up on stage to speak.
  • Joe “Crazy Joe” Walsh was voted best vice-chair for a committee which he did not vice-chair.
  • Sophia Ling, Sarah Hough, Ella Hathaway, and Katy Brown took turns dressing up as disgruntled hippies and delivering news to the delegates of the DNC.
  • 26 various coffee orders were fulfilled by Saloni Jain and Matt Demma on Sunday morning. It goes without saying that the staff of the Warren Towers Starbucks were less than pleased.

You might now be wondering as to the meaning of the strange title I’ve given this article. Quite frankly, I’m still not quite sure of what this bizarre creation is … while performing my rounds on Saturday, a middle schooler from Brown Middle School (Newton, MA) handed me a note and said, “the best part of my UN resolution is the flame-breathing sparkle dragon that I included.” Indeed, the scrunched-up piece of paper I now possessed, had a depiction of an otherworldly creature, covered in specked marks. I presume that he hoped for the dragon’s assistance in fighting illegal terrorist cells throughout the world.

And so, the weekend was a raging success, with students traveling from as far away as Stafford, VA (a 9-hour bus ride) to attend! I’ll take this as a final opportunity to thank all of the Academy faculty and staff for their help with planning and running this event and for letting us use their classrooms! Thank you especially to Mr. Reed, Dr. Dawson, and the Admissions office for chaperoning. Thank you to Dr. Horn for speaking. Thank you to Ms. Freda & Ms. Reisman for helping us order everything we needed in preparation. Thank you to Mr. Berkman and Mrs. Cannon for your support from the very get go!

On a final note, if the madness described above sounds like your cup of tea, or if you just have a knack for international affairs, consider joining Model UN! We meet in Mr. Reed’s room on Thursdays at 3pm, and we don’t bite.

To Beijing and Back

| FROM ACADEMY PRESS | BY SARAH HOUGH | March, 2013 |

I peered out the window to find a sweeping expanse of sand, drifted into enormous dunes and extending as far as the eye could see. There was no sign of human habitation whatsoever. Yet for some reason I couldn’t take my eyes of the eerily haunting scene, and I only turned away with reluctance when the flight attendant wearily asked me to “Please shut the window, ma’am.” I looked up to see my screen announcing that we had traveled 6128 miles and had 482 to go. That was when it hit me. While my classmates were worrying about their English finals, I was on a 747 above Mongolia, headed to Beijing so I could, of all things, sing. I wasn’t entirely sure how I’d gotten there, and was mildly confused as to why I was going at all. All I knew was that I spoke absolutely no Mandarin and had no idea what I was going to be doing. It was a terrifying idea, but less terrifying than the idea of never trying anything new.

So how exactly did I end up on this plane? In November, Andy, the conductor of PALS, a chorus I’m in, told me that there was a possible opportunity for awesome in December. I was psyched—I mean, until I realized it was the week of BUA finals. I told Andy that I’d talk to BUA about it, but that I highly doubted they’d let me miss exams, the climax of the academic year. This was when he mentioned that the trip would be to China.

Now that was a surprise. To say the least.

With the blessings of the BUA administration, I embarked on a whirlwind of a month. The most stressful of my life, I had interminable rehearsals, countless projects, emergency trips to the State Department for a new passport, and that little thing called finals. Throughout the whole process, I forbade myself from thinking about the fact that I might actually being going, because it wasn’t a sure thing.

Finally, the day before we left, we had confirmation we were definitely going. And so because I’d never really thought about it being real, I was rather confused as I sat in that plane and stared out at the desert. But despite all of this, the plane landed in Beijing, we went through customs, and the most incredible week of my life began.

Let me start out by saying that Beijing wasn’t fun because of the tourist spots. Honestly (spoiler alert!) they were really a letdown. The Bird’s Nest was just a ginormous stadium which looks exactly the same as it does on television. The Forbidden City is just rather large. And while I know that the Great Wall should have made me think about mankind’s great and terrible power to create and destroy, all I was thinking about was how not to fall to my death. Because one thing you don’t realize until you’re hundreds of feet up in the air on a slanted surface without handrails is that it’s fairly icy in winter. Be careful, folks.

What actually made me think about “mankind’s great and terrible power to create and destroy” were the sharp contrasts on full display during the trip.

We were there to record some songs for a New Year’s Spectacular type event for children, and that part of it was, well, spectacular. There was elaborate makeup, absurd costumes, modeling shoots, and fancy studios.

But, with glitter still in our hair and stars in our eyes, we also saw the city—not as advertised in glossy brochures, but as it really is. The city, sprawling and packed with people, slapped you in the face with the realities of megacities. A layer of grime seemed to cover everything, the air was hazy with smog. There was high rise after high rise, and it made me wonder—what were all of the people in those depressing cement buildings getting to do with their lives? And why should I, a 14 year old who stumbled into China out of sheer luck, get to travel across the world? Why did I deserve this chance?

I couldn’t answer that question, but I tried to simply make the most of my luck. What more can we do, really? I sang. Played games with some Estonian girls also there to sing. Managed to have conversations with people even when neither of us spoke each other’s language. And more than that, I thought.

Because sometimes it takes being a stranger in a strange land to realize what’s bad—and good—about your home. Sometimes it takes a week in a place without clean water to realize how lucky you are, and a week of the unexpected to realize what you’re missing in your everyday life.

I’m back in Brookline now, but my memories of Beijing are still vivid. Maybe that’s part of why we travel—even when you’re back home, you’re not the same. Traveling changes you.

One Final Week until Spring Break

Head’s Weekly Letter – February 28, 2013
______________________________________________________________

Dear Academy Families,

As we approach spring break next week, the energy in the Academy is marked. People are feeling both the depths of the February doldrums as well as the mounting excitement (just one more week!) till we all get a breather. Our return later in March is palpably different, as we head into the final stretch of the school year’s work together.

I will be away for several days this week at the National Association of Independent Schools (NAIS) annual conference, this year being held in Philadelphia. Usually 4,000 to 6, 000 school folks attend, to hear keynote speakers, to attend workshops on cutting-edge school issues, and to catch up with each other – sharing updates our common calling. In next week’s letter, I will report on any highlights I gleaned from rubbing elbows with the many presenters and attendees at NAIS, especially if such insights might accrue to the benefit of our Academy community.

Till then, let’s all take a deep breath, knowing that soon we will have a chance for rest and refreshment in spring break. This shorter weekly letter is just one more sign that I, at least, could use a breather!

Warm regards,
James S. Berkman
Head of School

 

We as Citizens in a Corrupt System

Dear Academy Families,

Yesterday’s ASM was one of the best I’ve heard in my seven years at the Academy, and I hope your student brings excited echoes of it home to you as well. If not, be sure to ask about it. Professor Lawrence Lessig, currently Furman Professor at Harvard Law School as well as Director of the Safra Center for Ethics at Harvard University, spoke to our community on “Citizens.” But that title belittles his intellectually provocative and highly entertaining presentation on how money corrupts our democratic system, and what we as citizens can and should be doing about it.

Some telling factoids on how and why money can “corrupt” a system: 144,000 Americans account for more than 90% of campaign funding in total, with only 132 people accounting for over 60%. Research by subjective industries (say, on potential health issues surrounding cell phones or plastic bottles) is almost always shown to hold such items “harmless,” while independently funded studies find the same items to be overwhelmingly “harmful.” This naturally causes distrust of any “official” word we might get, especially when government agencies are meant to be protecting us from such health risks.

So how can we “fix” a federal government both paralyzed from taking action without lobbyist funding support, and also a government distrusted by 70% to 80% of those polled (a number which is much higher for the younger generation)? Professor Lessig offered a bipartisan and “simple” fix that even he admits might not be possible: Use the new social media network to apply large-scale voter pressure on Congress to pass legislation requiring only public funding of political campaigns. This would involve giving every voting citizen a $50 voucher, forcing candidates to spend time educating the voters to win their vouchers – as opposed to the current system where 30% to 70% of a Congressman’s time is spent fundraising from a very few high rollers.

Clearly, our Academy students were taken by this talk and highly engaged. You would have been proud of the sophisticated questions asked of this Harvard Law professor, which he juggled with meaningful and vivid answers. Ultimately, he made clear, our students have inherited a broken system, and it is their generation’s challenge and opportunity to find a way to fix it…either through the internet tools they use so well to force the kind of legislation for public funding that Professor Lessig suggests (and which he  illustrated has worked with an example of legislation involving unwise censorship of the internet), or coming up with their own ideas to address the problem. But ignoring the problem, he stated, was a sure-fire way to watch our democratic republic deteriorate…an option we all agreed was unacceptable.

And in my own 9th grade English class an hour after ASM, we not only continued the debate on substance (How would a voucher system be funded?), we also analyzed why Professor Lessig’s talk was so entertaining and engaging…which only proves our students know how to take advantage of these exciting exposures to top-notch experts. As I said before, you would have been proud!

Warm regards,
James S. Berkman
Head of School

 

No Hybrid Program Quite Like Ours

Dear Academy Families,

With a “Head of School Holiday” (HOSH) unfortunately transformed into a pedestrian snow day last week – and, yes, it really was meant to be a day off for no good reason other than to give relief to the February doldrums when it was originally planned weeks in advance – and now with a three-day weekend ahead of us, I am starting to believe that four-day school weeks are the trend of the future. In thinking of short weeks, I recently learned that France, which traditionally has much longer school days, tempers that by letting everyone off one day each week (usually a Wednesday), but  is now considering inserting a half day on Wednesday, while shortening the other four days by 45 minutes each.

At the Academy, our daily/weekly schedule and annual calendar are bound by our joint high school/university curricula to adhere to a schedule and calendar tightly tied to Boston University’s. This creates several anomalies. For example, University courses usually start up after winter break by as many as 10 days later than Academy classes begin. This is balanced in spring break, when Academy students taking BU classes get just one week, while younger students and Academy faculty enjoy two. Or with our Commencement the day after the University’s Graduation, our seniors are done in the third week of May, while all of our other students continue into early June. And perhaps most vexing for seniors, we schedule All School Meeting (ASM) for 8 a.m. on Thursday in order to minimize conflicts with University electives they might want to take.

All of which confirms that the world is not a perfect place, and that trade-offs are required to optimize  the merging of our high school with a major research university. The same pattern that applies to calendars and daily schedules also rings true for budget planning, building and facilities questions, and employment practices. In my almost 30 years in independent school education, I can safely say that there is no hybrid program quite like ours! And that, I believe, is a real strength from which our students benefit…even if we can’t cancel University classes when I might next call a HOSH!

Warm regards,
James S. Berkman
Head of School

 

A Semi Formal Persuasion

| FROM ACADEMY PRESS | BY ANNA LIN-SCHWEITZER | JANUARY, 2013 |

I’m a big believer in going to dances. They are a fun way to relieve stress, hang out with friends, and (most importantly) get free food. On the whole, a majority of the student population attends each BUA dance—Fall Festival, Semi Formal, and Spring Fling. Yet of the three, Semi has always been the most controversial. Whenever I put in a good word for it, the most common response has been, “Why should I pay all that money just to see the people I see every day for another four hours?” While I believe this to be a rhetorical statement, I have some answers:

First, what you really missed out on this year was the boat. I admit it; I was ambivalent at first. Though Semi had been traditionally held on a boat before I came to BUA, I questioned the sanity of this endeavor. In my naivety, I wondered how the food would stay on the tables, and searched out the Dramamine before I left the house. Prejudiced by a whale-less whale watch this summer, I associated boats with crashing through cold and windy weather with no land in sight. Indeed, I was quite wrong. For one thing, I didn’t even notice when the boat set off. I was pleasantly surprised when I happened to glance out the window and noticed the lights of Boston blinking by. And they kept blinking by. We did not lose sight of land at any point on the trip, and seasickness was the last thing on my mind.

Additionally, the food remained on the tables. I would have cried if it had not. I am easily impressed, but have been a picky eater my entire life; when it comes to food, not everything goes. However, I can confidently say that I was very sad when my plate was empty. The buffet meal at the beginning hosted the World’s Softest Bread Rolls, accompanied, of course, by an array of lovely salad, beans, mashed potatoes, pasta primavera, and chicken. There was even a carving station for sirloin and pork! Dessert was equally, if not more, impressive: cheesecake with white chocolate ganache and raspberry topping, and not only chocolate chip cookies but also chocolate mousse truffles on chocolate cookies. My mouth is watering thinking about them.

However, food only took up a small part of the evening. Music played the entire night and for most of it, the dance floor was overflowing. For such a small school, we are really great dancers. And those of us who are less great at dancing can still feel okay about ourselves because nobody can really see who is who anyway when there are strange colors flashing from the ceiling all evening!

You also missed out on seeing all your friends dressed up. While not to the same extent as Prom, most people put effort into their outfits, so you should make that work worth their while! My only complaint was not pertaining to the dressing up part as such, but to the shoes-on rule of the boat. Due to the potential safety hazard of broken glass, many dress-wearing individuals had to totter around in heels for four hours. Personally, I did not strive for comfort when I picked out my shoes and came expecting to take them off. As a result, I found several new places on my feet that I didn’t even know could blister. Next year, I think I’ll be wearing sneakers, just to be on the safe side. Another incentive to come: seeing me in a dress with running sneakers!

Even though I could barely walk by the end of the evening, I am not at all sorry I went. Even in heels. The ultimate highlight of the night was going on the top of the deck to see the entire Boston skyline over the water. Despite a deceptive sixty degree Monday that melted all the snow, Friday evening happened to be a particularly cold day of the week and my bare legs did not thank me for spending close to 10 minutes in the open air. But this just goes to show how beautiful the view was! I personally do not get to see the Boston skyline over water every day. Or night, for that matter; most of the time I am surrounded by tall buildings and towering people. Sadly, the view was short-lived, owing to my very exposed and very numb legs, yet there’s something about being surrounded on all sides by what you see that looking out the window at the top of the GSU doesn’t match. You had to be there.

After hearing all about this fantastic night, I can’t imagine that you are glad you missed Semi. Apply what you learn daily at BUA: nothing daunts a scholar! Not even a dance. If the boat aspect doesn’t appeal to you, you must be tempted by the World’s Softest Bread Rolls. They were so soft, I almost didn’t want to eat mine; all I wanted to do was stroke it. Even just seeing your friends in pretty clothes is a novelty. Great minds frequently prioritize work over dress; at BUA, it’s not every day you get to see a bunch of nicely dressed people all in one room! Yet whether or not you are considering going next year or ever, I’ll always have fun remembering the view, the dancing, and the food.

Running Out of Adjectives: A Review of BUA’s “A Midsummer Night’s Dream”

| FROM ACADEMY PRESS | BY JANINA HUANG | JANUARY, 2013 |

Ever since some of my friends were cast back in September, I was extremely excited to see BUA’s production of A Midsummer Night’s Dream, and I am pleased to say that it did not disappoint.

Quince (Sunday Hull, ’16), Bottom (Shurik Zavriyev, ’15), Flute (Nix Goldowsky-Dill, ’16), Starveling (Katy Brown, ’15), and Snout (Damian Liu, ’16) were all hilariously true to character, and brought the play within a play to life. The actors were all outstandingly great at acting outstandingly horrid at what they were doing, and their characters’ overly dramatic monologues and their constant breaking out of character did a wonderful job making the tragic story of Pyramus and Thisbe into a comedy.

As for the four lovers, Brian Reidy (’16) played an excellent Demetrius, adding hate and spite to every word his character said to the girl who loved at first unrequitedly, and Susanna Faas-Bush (’14) gave an emotional performance as the girl in question, Helena. Hermia and Lysander, played by Leah Magid (’13) and David Lax (’14) respectively, were equally stunning. Not only were they all extremely good at portraying their characters, but they were also all convincingly good at pretending to fall asleep.

Bennett Vogt (’13) and Katrina Goldowsky-Dill (’14) were both great as well, whether it was as the bickering Oberon and Titania, or as the charming Theseus and Hippolyta. David Kleinman (’16), the mischievous Puck, was also fantastic, bringing a comedic side to his character that made the audience laugh at times, and ending the production beautifully with his last monologue.

The costumes for the fairies were colorful and creative, and Ms. Cellucci’s art class did a spectacular job interpreting the names of the fairies and what they might look like. On their own in the art studio, these costumes awed, and on stage, they shined. No doubt they were my favorite part of the play after the acting.

On paper, Shakespeare’s work may be tedious to read. However, when brought on stage, it is almost as though it is something completely different. The actors were all able to lift their characters off the page and recite their lines with expression and emotion, and the result was a stellar show. I can’t wait to see what else BUA’s Drama Club will bring to the stage next. It will be hard to top a performance such as A Midsummer Night’s Dream, but I am sure that they will rise to the challenge once again.

Common Sense, Please?

| FROM ACADEMY PRESS | BY SOPHIA WEDEEN | JANUARY, 2013 |

On December 14th, Adam Lanza entered a Connecticut elementary school and fatally shot 20 students and 6 teachers with a semiautomatic assault rifle. This mass shooting at Sandy Hook was not the first time that a major act of gun violence has captured public attention; the attempted assassination of congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords in Tucson and the shootings in an Aurora movie theater have likewise given the controversial topic of gun control a place in the national conversation.

In the weeks following Sandy Hook, both the proponents of gun rights and the advocates of stricter regulations have looked to these tragedies in an attempt to solve the problem of gun violence. Some see these tragedies as a call for further regulations, viewing organizations like the NRA as enablers. Others believe that firearms are necessary for self-protection and argue that these unprecedented killings illustrate the futility of gun regulation in preventing firearms-related violence.

I don’t recommend that President Obama travel door-to-door and pry people’s guns, bullets, and butter knives right out of their hands. Nor do I believe congress should enact a law requiring that all citizens purchase heat-seeking intercontinental ballistic missiles for self-protection. The problem of gun violence is a complicated one, and it won’t be solved overnight. However, I think there are a couple of sound and reasonable regulations that would make a huge difference.

To begin, let’s talk about semiautomatic assault rifles. Semi-automatic firearms are self-loading, meaning the user doesn’t need to manually cycle each round and can fire multiple bullets very rapidly. It is currently legal to manufacture and purchase semiautomatic assault weapons in the United States, and I find it insane that we have not reinstated a federal assault weapons ban. The previous decade-long ban expired in 2004, but because the majority of gun deaths in the United States result from handguns, it had a negligible effect on overall violence. That, however, is no excuse to make semiautomatics available to the public. Semi-automatic weapons were used in the shootings in Tucson, Aurora, and most recently, Newtown. The US Military currently issues several kinds of semiautomatic weapons, many of which US citizens can legally purchase. As Former US General Stanley McChrystal noted, semiautomatics are supposed be incredibly damaging because they are intended for military use and only military use.

The Second Amendment declared our right to keep and bear arms, but technology has made significant advances since 1789. We’ve already agreed as a society that we need to draw the line at certain weapons. Obviously, citizens aren’t allowed to purchase tanks or surface-to-air missiles. And once people figured out that armor-piercing bullets can be used for, well, armor piercing, they enacted a federal ban on those as well. We face this exact issue with semiautomatics, so we should acknowledge them as yet another unnecessarily dangerous weapon. This isn’t about gun rights – it’s a no-brainer about public safety.

Politicians, activists, and much of the national media view Sandy Hook as the root of the problem when it comes to firearms. But the reality is that shootings account for fewer than 100 deaths per year, a minuscule fraction of the 29,000 who are killed by guns in the US annually. And even though mass shootings are nearly impossible to predict, there still some regulations we can enact to address the epidemic of gun violence in this country.

Background checks are one example of a regulation that has not gone nearly far enough. It is currently illegal for licensed gun stores to sell to those convicted of a misdemeanor or felony, those residing illegally in the US, or those who have been committed to a mental institution. However, while licensed gun stores are legally required to perform this background check, private owners selling to individuals within their own State have no such obligation. According to a 1997 study, 35% of gun owners purchased their firearm from a family member or friend, 15% purchase from a retail gun store, and the rest obtain firearms from drug dealers (15%), on the black market (6%), from theft (6%), etc. In other words, only the 15% of gun owners who purchase from retail stores are required to meet the minimum standard of a basic background check in order to purchase a firearm.

While it is complicated and difficult to control illegal acquisition of guns, legislation requiring that private sellers perform background checks would increase the number of vetted gun owners by 35%. It’s completely insane that this isn’t already mandatory. The Department of Transportation set up the National Driver Register – a database that all sellers must consult before allowing someone to purchase a car. Why, exactly, does no such database exist for gun owners, even though they’re buying weapons?

What frustrates me most about the debates over gun control is that they fall so easily into hyperbole. As I’ve stated, there certainly are things we can do about gun violence, such as banning assault rifles and making background checks thorough and mandatory in all cases. But after each mass shooting comes an ideological mud fight in which panic reigns supreme and the only available solutions involve pointing fingers and radically undermining the other side’s positions. In 2013, the major problem we face isn’t finding some way to reduce gun violence, but finding a way to overcome the politics that surround gun violence. I honestly don’t know if the gun control debate bodes well for the future of the American political system or merely illustrates its failings. Either way, there’s a New Years resolution I encourage everyone to try out: when it comes to issues like gun regulations, calm down and use your head.  It’s surprising how far common sense will get you.

The Slog toward Spring

Dear Academy Families,

First it’s over 60 degrees, then it’s down to 4 degrees, then it’s over 60 again, then back to 20…all in a two-week block of January…! In addition to fostering viral contagion (and there is a lot of sickness still circulating), it’s also thrown my biological clock out of whack to have such see-sawing of weather in mid-winter.

And as we enter February – which tends to be the “doldrums” of the winter – it’s not only the weather that can throw me (and our students and faculty) out of whack. This month is the nadir of the whole academic year!

So how can we combat the likely tendency to feel low and disgruntled? The BUA Parent Association breakfast this week at ASM was one good way to start, with great food and the chance for our yearbook staff to get photos of every club, sport, and activity. The ski trip later this month is also a welcome tradition to beat the doldrums of February. And those students running the Senior Play have organized a movie night as well.

Personally, I tend to keep my head down, my feet moving forward, and my mind focused on my daily tasks, as I “slog” towards spring break in March. While I don’t recommend this method for everyone, since each person can adapt his or her own best strategy, I do encourage us all to be aware of this annual dip in energy and engagement, so that we can consciously counteract it — as well as watch out for each other. This is the month when a kind word or a friendly gesture gets “more bang for the buck” than at other times of the year.

So however you decide to craft your own way to keep your spirits up, and however you do or don’t feel about the crazy weather or might be affected by the ongoing sickness, I hope that others in the Academy community are watching out for you, and that you find ways to support them as well, until spring comes to lighten everyone’s mood and perhaps settle our weather…unless, of course, we have snow in April!

Warm regards,
James S. Berkman
Head of School