<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Intellectual Property Law Society &#187; pkilgore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.bu.edu/buiplaw/author/pck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/buiplaw</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 20:16:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Technology Analyst Training</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/buiplaw/2010/analyst-training/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bu.edu/buiplaw/2010/analyst-training/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 20:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pkilgore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Prosecution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bu.edu/buiplaw/?p=57</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BU&#8217;s Technology Development Office has put up signups for their annual analyst training program. The analyst program is a great way to gain exposure to patent law, technology licensing, and startups. Exploring Careers in Technology Development Most research universities, federal labs, and mid-to-large sized companies have some sort of technology transfer or intellectual property management [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bu.edu/buiplaw/2010/analyst-training/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bilski &#8212; Throwing Back The Gauntlet</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/buiplaw/2010/bilski-throwing-back-the-gauntlet/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bu.edu/buiplaw/2010/bilski-throwing-back-the-gauntlet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pkilgore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business method patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Prosecution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bu.edu/buiplaw/?p=52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patenly-O has more commentary on Bilski, including a great piece by Shubha Ghosh, Vilas Research Professor &#38; Professor of Law at the University of Wisconsin Law School. Vilas writes: Ultimately, Bilski v Kappos says more about how patent law is made in the United States than about patentable subject matter. By setting the clock back to 1982, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bu.edu/buiplaw/2010/bilski-throwing-back-the-gauntlet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bilski v. Kappos</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/buiplaw/2010/bilski-v-kappos/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bu.edu/buiplaw/2010/bilski-v-kappos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pkilgore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business method patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Prosecution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bu.edu/buiplaw/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court release their opinion of Bilski yesterday, leaving more questions than answers on business method tests. Reactions are streaming in from around the country. Patently-O writes: In general, the opinion offers no clarity or aid for those tasked with determining whether a particular innovation falls within Section 101. The opinion provides no new [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bu.edu/buiplaw/2010/bilski-v-kappos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patent Wars: Apple files patent counter-suit against Kodak</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/buiplaw/2010/patent-wars-apple-files-patent-countersuit-against-kodak/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bu.edu/buiplaw/2010/patent-wars-apple-files-patent-countersuit-against-kodak/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pkilgore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ars Technica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bu.edu/buiplaw/?p=36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In January, Kodak sued both Apple and RIM (makers of Blackberry) for infringing on patented imaging technology. In an answer filled this week, Apple claims not only that Kodak&#8217;s patents are invalid, but counterclaimed that Kodak is infringing upon two of their own patents. Read more at Ars Technica Look up the patents themselves on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bu.edu/buiplaw/2010/patent-wars-apple-files-patent-countersuit-against-kodak/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
