<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BU Now &#187; Advanced Micro Devices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/tag/advanced-micro-devices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow</link>
	<description>News, information and research from Boston University</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 18:14:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Intel settles antitrust case with FTC</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/08/04/intel-settles-antitrust-case-with-ftc/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/08/04/intel-settles-antitrust-case-with-ftc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 19:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dick Taffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Professor Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer chips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Trade Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/?p=6577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a &#8220;I-never-did-it-and-won&#8217;t-do-it-again&#8221; deal, Computer chip-making giant Intel agreed with the Federal Trade Commission to step back from business practices &#8212; like coercing computer makers not to buy microprosessor chips from rivals &#8212; which allegedly stifled competition and deprived consumers of better choices for at least a decade.  The &#8220;play nice&#8221; settlement comes on the heels [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-6578" src="http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/files/2010/08/computer-chip-150x150.jpg" alt="computer chip" width="105" height="105" />In a &#8220;I-never-did-it-and-won&#8217;t-do-it-again&#8221; deal, Computer chip-making giant Intel <a title="agreed" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/08/04/AR2010080403335.html" target="_blank">agreed </a>with the Federal Trade Commission to step back from business practices &#8212; like coercing computer makers not to buy microprosessor chips from rivals &#8212; which allegedly stifled competition and deprived consumers of better choices for at least a decade.  The &#8220;play nice&#8221; settlement comes on the heels of a $1.25 billion settlement last year with competitor AMD and as Intel continues to contest a $1.45 billion antitrust fine in Europe.  Law Professor <a title="Keith Hylton" href="http://www.bu.edu/law/faculty/profiles/bios/full-time/hylton_k.html" target="_blank">Keith Hylton</a>, an authority in antitrust law, says the incentives on both sides for a settlement were especially strong in this case.</p>
<p><em>“The FTC&#8217;s claims, which mirrored those of the European Comission, were not well founded in American law.  Intel, in spite of having a strong legal argument, had no interest in spending years in litigation against the FTC (along with the European Commission).  The obvious result of this mixture of incentives is a settlement.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Contact Keith Hylton, 617-353-8959, <a href="mailto:knhylton@bu.edu">knhylton@bu.edu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/08/04/intel-settles-antitrust-case-with-ftc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>