<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BU Now &#187; antitrust law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/tag/antitrust-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow</link>
	<description>News, information and research from Boston University</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 18:14:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Apple online-music antitrust probe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/05/26/apple-online-music-antitrust-probe/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/05/26/apple-online-music-antitrust-probe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 21:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dick Taffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Professor Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BU School of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Hylton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mp3 downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/?p=5742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Justice Department reportedly is in the early stages of an antitrust investigation against Apple Inc., the largest seller of music online, looking into allegations that it used its dominant market position to try to keep music labels from granting exclusive access to content to Amazon.com.  Law Professor Keith Hylton, an authority on antitrust law, says [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-5744" src="http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/files/2010/05/Department-of-Justice-seal1-150x150.jpg" alt="Department of Justice seal" width="90" height="90" />The <a href="http://www.justice.gov/">Justice Department</a> <a title="reportedly" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/26/technology/26apple.html?hp" target="_blank">reportedly</a> is in the early stages of an antitrust investigation against <a href="apple.com">Apple Inc</a>., the largest seller of music online, looking into allegations that it used its dominant market position to try to keep music labels from granting exclusive access to content to <a href="http://www.amazon.com">Amazon.com</a>.  <a href="http://bu.edu/law">Law</a> Professor <a title="Keith Hylton" href="http://www.bu.edu/law/faculty/profiles/bios/full-time/hylton_k.html" target="_blank">Keith Hylton</a>, an authority on antitrust law, says it makes sense for Apple to trim market support for certain songs when gets a smaller share of the profits from their sale &#8212; but they&#8217;re gotten aggressive about it lately.</p>
<p><em>&#8220;There are details that might indicate that they have gone too far in some instances; that remains to be seen.  Still, in the long run, consumers generally gain from this activity.”</em></p>
<p>Contact Keith Hylton, 617-353-8959, <a href="mailto:knhylton@bu.edu">knhylton@bu.edu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/05/26/apple-online-music-antitrust-probe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SCOTUS slaps down NFL</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/05/24/scotus-slaps-down-nfl/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/05/24/scotus-slaps-down-nfl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 21:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dick Taffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Professor Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Needle Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BU College of Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BU School of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Shorr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Hylton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Football League]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reebok]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[souvenirs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/?p=5675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a unanimous vote, the Supreme Court denied the National Football League its goal of broad protection from antitrust suits.  The high court ruled on a case involving a license for making souvenir caps and sent to back to a lower court to further consideration allegations by a smaller company that challenged the league&#8217;s 10-year [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-5676" src="http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/files/2010/05/NFL-logo-150x150.jpg" alt="NFL logo" width="90" height="90" />In a unanimous vote, the <a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/">Supreme Court</a> <a title="denied" href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/judicial/2010-05-24-supreme-court-nfl-american-needle_N.htm" target="_blank">denied</a> the <a href="http://www.nfl.com/">National Football League</a> its goal of broad protection from antitrust suits.  The high court ruled on a case involving a license for making souvenir caps and sent to back to a lower court to further consideration allegations by a smaller company that challenged the league&#8217;s 10-year exclusive deal with<a href="http://www.reebok.com/US/"> Reebok</a>.  <a href="http://management.bu.edu">Law</a> Professor <a title="Keith Hylton" href="http://www.bu.edu/law/faculty/profiles/bios/full-time/hylton_k.html" target="_blank">Keith Hylton</a>, an authority on antitrust law, says it is understandable that the court would be reluctant to expand the &#8220;single entity&#8221; concept to include the NFL.  Meantime, <a href="http://www.bu.edu/com/sports_institute/courses.html">Sports Journalism </a>Professor <a href="http://www.bu.edu/com/about/faculty/frank_shorr.shtml" target="_blank">Frank Shorr</a> says this could be the &#8220;watershed moment.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Keith Hylton:</strong></p>
<p><em>&#8220;‘Single entity’ status implies exemption from Section 1 of the Sherman Act, and the Court is reluctant to create broad exemptions to Section 1 when the effects may not be entirely clear.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Contact: Keith Hylton, 617-353-8959, <a href="mailto:knhylton@bu.edu">knhylton@bu.edu</a></p>
<p><strong>Frank Shorr:</strong></p>
<p><em>&#8220;It will be interesting to see if the court now expands it&#8217;s view of the National Football League&#8217;s long-standing policies.  Today it&#8217;s hats. Tomorrow, who knows &#8212; uniforms, helmets, wrist bands &#8212; anything that they can make a profit on and not have to share.  We could be looking back on this decision in the not-to-distant future and saying, that was the watershed moment.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Contact: Frank Shorr, 617-353-5163, <a href="fshorr@bu.edu" target="_blank">fshorr@bu.edu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/05/24/scotus-slaps-down-nfl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google/AdMob deal okayed</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/05/21/googleadmob-deal-okayed/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/05/21/googleadmob-deal-okayed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 22:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dick Taffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Professor Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AdMob]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Hylton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quattro Wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[School of Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/?p=5658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite concerns that Google could extend its Internet marketing dominance into the emerging field of wireless devices, federal regulators approved the company&#8217;s $750 million purchase of its mobile advertising rival AdMob.  Law Professor Keith Hylton, an authority on antitrust law, said it looks like the right decision given rapid changes in the market such as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-5659" src="http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/files/2010/05/Google-on-laptop-150x150.jpg" alt="Google on laptop" width="120" height="120" />Despite concerns that<a href="google.com"> Google</a> could extend its Internet marketing dominance into the emerging field of wireless devices, federal regulators <a title="approved" href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hq6peaILdNgY5o_jpfYIh_DQA1RAD9FRC2301" target="_blank">approved</a> the company&#8217;s $750 million purchase of its mobile advertising rival <a href="http://www.admob.com/">AdMob</a>.  <a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/">Law</a> Professor <a title="Keith Hylton" href="http://www.bu.edu/law/faculty/profiles/bios/full-time/hylton_k.html" target="_blank">Keith Hylton</a>, an authority on antitrust law, said it looks like the right decision given rapid changes in the market such as rival <a href="apple.com">Apple</a> buying the third largest mobile ad network,<a href="Quattro Wireless"> Quattro Wireless</a>.  Besides, he said, Google doesn&#8217;t seemed worried about antitrust threats from the Obama administration.</p>
<p><em>“[Google] appears to have the administration working diligently on its side on the net neutrality issue, and that is probably worth a lot more than these relatively minor antitrust issues.”</em></p>
<p>Contact Keith Hylton, 617-353-8959, <a href="mailto:knhylton@bu.edu">knhylton@bu.edu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/05/21/googleadmob-deal-okayed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New antitrust guidelines for mergers</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/04/20/new-antitrust-guidelines-for-mergers/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/04/20/new-antitrust-guidelines-for-mergers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dick Taffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Professor Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Trade Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mergers & acquisitions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/?p=5251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. antitrust regulators from the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission have proposed new guidelines for how they scrutinize mergers for possible antitrust violations.  Law Professor Keith Hylton, an antitrust law authority, and School of Management finance Professor Michael Salinger, a former FTC director, agree the proposed guidelines more accurately reflect current practice [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-5252" src="http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/files/2010/04/antitrust-image-150x150.jpg" alt="antitrust image" width="150" height="150" />U.S. antitrust regulators from the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission have proposed <a title="new guidelines" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=arDmjFTiJn9s" target="_blank">new guidelines </a>for how they scrutinize mergers for possible antitrust violations.  Law Professor <a title="Keith Hylton" href="http://www.bu.edu/law/faculty/profiles/bios/full-time/hylton_k.html" target="_blank">Keith Hylton</a>, an antitrust law authority, and School of Management finance Professor <a title="Michael Salinger" href="http://smgnet.bu.edu/mgmt_new/profiles/SalingerMichael.html" target="_blank">Michael Salinger</a>, a former FTC director, agree the proposed guidelines more accurately reflect current practice &#8212; but that only time will tell if they&#8217;ll work.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline">Hylton</span>:  <em>&#8220;As defendants become better acquainted with actual practice, the FTC may find that it prefers to make further changes down the road.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline">Salinger</span>:  <em>&#8220;What remains to be seen is whether the courts will accept the less structured approach.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Contact Keith Hylton, 617-353-8959, <a href="mailto:knhylton@bu.edu">knhylton@bu.edu</a>, or Michael Salinger, 617-353-4408, <a href="mailto:salinger@bu.edu">salinger@bu.edu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/04/20/new-antitrust-guidelines-for-mergers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comcast/NBC deal scrutinized</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/03/12/comcastnbc-deal-scrutinized/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/03/12/comcastnbc-deal-scrutinized/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dick Taffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Professor Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC Universal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/?p=4779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Federal regulators insist they&#8217;ll keep a close eye on the proposed merger of Comcast, the country&#8217;s biggest cable-TV operator, and NBC Universal, with its vast content-production empire.   Law Professor Keith Hylton, an authority on antitrust law, says the feds need to make sure the merger won&#8217;t crush competition or harm consumers. &#8220;But the government should [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-4782" src="http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/files/2010/03/Comcast-NBC-Universal1-150x150.jpg" alt="Comcast-NBC-Universal" width="150" height="150" />Federal regulators insist they&#8217;ll keep a <a title="close eye" href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iH0ZfYmqiFh9_XxqJXxYKbKrgiGgD9ECMD080" target="_blank">close eye </a>on the proposed merger of Comcast, the country&#8217;s biggest cable-TV operator, and NBC Universal, with its vast content-production empire.   Law Professor <a title="Keith Hylton" href="http://www.bu.edu/law/faculty/profiles/bios/full-time/hylton_k.html" target="_blank">Keith Hylton</a>, an authority on antitrust law, says the feds need to make sure the merger won&#8217;t crush competition or harm consumers.</p>
<p><em>&#8220;But the government should try to make sure that the conditions imposed on the merger do not reduce the potential benefits to consumers.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Contact Keith Hulton, 617-353-8959, <a href="mailto:knhylton@bu.edu">knhylton@bu.edu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/03/12/comcastnbc-deal-scrutinized/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>