<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BU Now &#187; FDA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/tag/fda/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow</link>
	<description>News, information and research from Boston University</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 18:14:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The FDA and antibiotics for animals</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/07/14/the-fda-and-antibiotics-for-animals/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/07/14/the-fda-and-antibiotics-for-animals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 20:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dick Taffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Professor Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agribusiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antibiotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[factory farms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MRSA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/?p=6360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In hopes of slowing the growing scourge of killer bacteria, the Food and Drug Administration has released a policy document that says agricultural uses of antibiotics should be limited to assuring animal health.  But the FDA again stopped short of banning antibiotics in feed given cattle, chickens and pigs &#8212; as European regulators already have.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-6361" src="http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/files/2010/07/factory-farm-150x150.jpg" alt="factory farm" width="105" height="105" />In hopes of slowing the growing scourge of killer bacteria, the Food and Drug Administration has released a policy <a title="document" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/29/health/policy/29fda.html" target="_blank">document</a> that says agricultural uses of antibiotics should be limited to assuring animal health.  But the FDA again stopped short of banning antibiotics in feed given cattle, chickens and pigs &#8212; as European regulators already have.  School of Public Health associate Professor <a title="Wendy Heiger-Bernays" href="http://sph.bu.edu/index.php?option=com_sphdir&amp;id=239&amp;Itemid=340&amp;INDEX=770" target="_blank">Wendy Heiger-Bernays</a>, in a <em>BU Today</em> <a title="interview" href="http://www.bu.edu/today/node/11248" target="_blank">interview</a>, says until a major food-related illness alerts Americans to the dangers of the industrialized food suply, it&#8217;s a battle that agribusiness will continue to win.</p>
<p><em>&#8220;If the public wakes up and looks at where their food is coming from, I suspect there’ll be a significant push &#8230; But I don’t think we’re going to see something significant until we have numbers of cases of illness in the human population traced back to factory farms.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Contact Wendy Heiger-Bernays, 617-638-4620, <a href="mailto:whb@bu.edu">whb@bu.edu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/07/14/the-fda-and-antibiotics-for-animals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FDA and outsourced drug making</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/06/15/fda-and-outsourced-drug-making/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/06/15/fda-and-outsourced-drug-making/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 22:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dick Taffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Professor Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BU Law School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food and Drug Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthy Law Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Outterson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pfizer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceutical manufacturing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/?p=5951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Food and Drug Administration reportedly will propose tougher regulations for pharmaceutical companies that outsource manufacturing of drugs, making them more responsible for the safety and purity of the products made by contractors.  Law Professor Kevin Outterson, an authority on food and drug law and director of the Healthy Law Program, says the changes likely [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-5952" src="http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/files/2010/06/pills.bmp" alt="pills" width="69" height="104" />The<a href="http://www.fda.gov/"> Food and Drug</a> Administration <a title="reportedly" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704324304575307421660792654.html?KEYWORDS=FDA" target="_blank">reportedly</a> will propose tougher regulations for pharmaceutical companies that outsource manufacturing of drugs, making them more responsible for the safety and purity of the products made by contractors.  <a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/">Law</a> Professor <a title="Kevin Outterson" href="http://www.bu.edu/law/faculty/profiles/bios/full-time/outterson_k.html" target="_blank">Kevin Outterson</a>, an authority on food and drug law and director of the <a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/prospective/jd/concentrations/healthlaw.html">Healthy Law Program</a>, says the changes likely will have little effect because branded drug manufacturers put their reputations on the line every day with their drugs already.</p>
<p><em>&#8220;I&#8217;d be surprised if the FDA requirements are a great improvement over what Pfizer and Merck already do to protect the integrity of their supply chain.”</em></p>
<p>Contact Kevin Outterson, 617-353-3103, <a href="mailto:mko@bu.edu">mko@bu.edu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/06/15/fda-and-outsourced-drug-making/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drug firm snoops on FDA officials</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/03/31/drug-firm-snoops-on-fda-officials/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/03/31/drug-firm-snoops-on-fda-officials/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 21:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dick Taffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Professor Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amphastar Pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food and Drug Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Momenta Pharmaceuticals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/?p=4963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amphastar Pharmaceuticals reportedly paid more than $100,000 to a private investigative firm to snoop on FDA officials they suspected of having a too-chummy relationship with a competitor drug maker.  Amphastar insists it did nothing wrong, but Senate Finance Committee investigators are looking into the case.  Law Professor Kevin Outterson, an authority on drug law and marketing, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-4965" src="http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/files/2010/03/Amphastar-Pharmaceuticals-logo-150x150.jpg" alt="Amphastar Pharmaceuticals logo" width="135" height="135" />Amphastar Pharmaceuticals <a title="reportedly " href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0310/35212.html" target="_blank">reportedly</a> paid more than $100,000 to a private investigative firm to snoop on FDA officials they suspected of having a too-chummy relationship with a competitor drug maker.  Amphastar insists it did nothing wrong, but Senate Finance Committee investigators are looking into the case.  Law Professor <a title="Kevin Outterson" href="http://www.bu.edu/law/faculty/profiles/bios/full-time/outterson_k.html" target="_blank">Kevin Outterson</a>, an authority on drug law and marketing, says it&#8217;s disturbing.</p>
<p><em>&#8220;I don’t know what is more disturbing: that Amphastar hired the private detectives or that they are unapologetic about it after being caught.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Contact Kevin Outterson, 617-353-3103, <a href="mailto:mko@bu.edu">mko@bu.edu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/03/31/drug-firm-snoops-on-fda-officials/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cookie dough recall</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2009/06/19/cookie-dough-recall/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2009/06/19/cookie-dough-recall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dick Taffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cookie dough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nestle USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toll House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/?p=1523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nestle USA is voluntarily recalling its Toll House refrigerated cookie dough products after reports of people getting ill from eating the dough raw.  School of Management Professor Michael Salinger, a former director at the Federal Trade Commission, can discuss the mechanics of such recalls. Contact Michael Salinger, 617-353-4408, salinger@bu.edu]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1532" src="http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/files/2009/06/medium_8a8e8b9c1cb9ce51011cb9dfb0ad0176.jpg" alt="medium_8a8e8b9c1cb9ce51011cb9dfb0ad0176" width="126" height="126" />Nestle USA is <a title="voluntarily recalling" href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iBgfgfrP49_41QWDIJBG3damP4ogD98TPOL80" target="_blank">voluntarily recalling </a>its Toll House refrigerated cookie dough products after reports of people getting ill from eating the dough raw.  School of Management Professor <a title="Michael Salinger" href="http://smgnet.bu.edu/mgmt_new/profiles/SalingerMichael.html" target="_blank">Michael Salinger</a>, a former director at the Federal Trade Commission, can discuss the mechanics of such recalls.</p>
<p>Contact Michael Salinger, 617-353-4408, <a href="mailto:salinger@bu.edu">salinger@bu.edu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2009/06/19/cookie-dough-recall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free speech and tobacco regulation</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2009/06/16/free-speech-and-tobacco-regulation/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2009/06/16/free-speech-and-tobacco-regulation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dick Taffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/?p=1318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A free-speech fight is brewing over part of the bill, which President Obama will sign, giving the FDA regulatory control over tobacco.  It pits the public interest in preventing young people from smoking against the right of tobacco companies to advertise to adult smokers.  School of Law Professor Tracey Maclin, a Constitutional law expert, can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="a free-speech fight is brewing" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/16/business/16tobacco.html?ref=global-home" target="_blank">A free-speech fight is brewing </a>over part of the bill, which President Obama will sign, giving the FDA regulatory control over tobacco.  It pits the public interest in preventing young people from smoking against the right of tobacco companies to advertise to adult smokers.  School of Law Professor <a title="Tracey Maclin" href="http://www.bu.edu/law/faculty/profiles/bios/full-time/maclin_t.html" target="_blank">Tracey Maclin</a>, a Constitutional law expert, can break down the battle lines.</p>
<p>Contact Tracey Maclin, 617-353-4688, <a href="mailto:tmaclin@bu.edu">tmaclin@bu.edu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2009/06/16/free-speech-and-tobacco-regulation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FDA rule over tobacco just smoke?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2009/06/12/fda-rule-over-tobacco-just-smoke/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2009/06/12/fda-rule-over-tobacco-just-smoke/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dick Taffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cigarettes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philip Morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/?p=1140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After decades of trying, Congress now will give the FDA regulatory contol over tobacco.  College of Communication advertising Professor John Carroll explains in a WBUR-FM commentary how the &#8220;smoke and mirrors&#8221; of cigarette marketing will likely still leave Philip Morris ahead of the pack. Contact John Carroll, 617-353-3493, carroll7@bu.edu]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After decades of trying, Congress now will give the FDA regulatory contol over tobacco.  College of Communication advertising Professor <a title="John Carroll" href="http://www.bu.edu/com/about/faculty/john_carroll.shtml" target="_blank">John Carroll </a>explains in a <a title="WBUR-FM commentary" href="http://www.wbur.org/2009/06/12/fda-tobacco" target="_blank">WBUR-FM commentary </a>how the &#8220;smoke and mirrors&#8221; of cigarette marketing will likely still leave Philip Morris ahead of the pack.</p>
<p>Contact John Carroll, 617-353-3493, <a href="mailto:carroll7@bu.edu">carroll7@bu.edu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2009/06/12/fda-rule-over-tobacco-just-smoke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FDA to decide if adult antipsychotic drugs are safe for kids and teens</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2009/06/09/fda-to-decide-if-adult-antipsychotic-drugs-are-safe-for-kids-and-teens/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2009/06/09/fda-to-decide-if-adult-antipsychotic-drugs-are-safe-for-kids-and-teens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron Rosenberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antipsychotic drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/?p=1004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FDA will decide this week if three powerful antipsychotic medications approved for adults &#8212; Zyprexa, Seroquel and Geodon &#8212; can be safely prescribed for children as young as 10 years old. David Barlow, professor of psychiatry and psychology, knows the controversial issues and the &#8220;enormous pressure,&#8221; facing the FDA. Contact David Barlow,Ph.D., 617-353-9610, dhbarlow@bu.edu]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1014" src="http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/files/2009/06/fda-logoa.jpg" alt="fda-logoa" width="140" height="70" />The FDA <a title="will decide this week" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124421698838089325.html" target="_blank">will decide this week </a>if three powerful antipsychotic medications approved for adults &#8212; Zyprexa, Seroquel and Geodon &#8212; can be safely prescribed for children as young as 10 years old. <a title="David Barlow" href="http://www.bu.edu/card/staff/barlow.html" target="_blank">David Barlow</a>, professor of psychiatry and psychology, knows the controversial issues and the &#8220;enormous pressure,&#8221; facing the FDA.</p>
<p>Contact David Barlow,Ph.D., 617-353-9610, dhbarlow@bu.edu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2009/06/09/fda-to-decide-if-adult-antipsychotic-drugs-are-safe-for-kids-and-teens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proposed FDA regulation of tobacco is weak</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2009/06/03/proposed-fda-regulation-of-tobacco-is-very-weak/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2009/06/03/proposed-fda-regulation-of-tobacco-is-very-weak/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 18:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron Rosenberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nicotine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philip Morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/?p=764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For Michael Siegel, MD, a long time anti-smoking advocate and professor of social and behavioral sciences, the proposed Food and Drug Administration regulation of cigarettes is really a smoke screen for Big Tobacco. Writing in the Los Angeles Times, he states that the legislation was crafted, in part, by Philip Morris in a deal with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For <a title="Michael Siegel" href="http://sph.bu.edu/index.php?option=com_sphdir&amp;id=239&amp;Itemid=340&amp;INDEX=677" target="_blank">Michael Siegel</a>, MD, a long time anti-smoking advocate and professor of social and behavioral sciences, the proposed Food and Drug Administration regulation of cigarettes is really a smoke screen for Big Tobacco. Writing in the <a title="Los Angeles Times" href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-siegel3-2009jun03,0,1905325.story" target="_blank">Los Angeles Times</a>, he states that the legislation was crafted, in part, by Philip Morris in a deal with health groups, notably the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, as there is no mandate to eliminate nicotine, and limited reduction of toxins and carcinogens in tobacco.</p>
<p>Contact Michael Siegel, (617) 638-5160, mbsiegel@bu.edu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2009/06/03/proposed-fda-regulation-of-tobacco-is-very-weak/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could smokeless e-cigarettes derail FDA tobacco regulation?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2009/05/12/could-smokeless-e-cigarettes-derail-fda-tobacco-regulation/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2009/05/12/could-smokeless-e-cigarettes-derail-fda-tobacco-regulation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 21:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron Rosenberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/?p=338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The proposed Food and Drug Administration regulation of tobacco products is running into unexpected opposition from such health groups as the American Lung Assn., American Cancer Society and Tobacco-Free Kids. Why? They want to include electronic cigarettes, now sold on line and at mall kiosks, that contain no tobacco, produce no smoke, and help many smokers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The proposed Food and Drug Administration regulation of tobacco products is running into unexpected opposition from such health groups as the American Lung Assn., American Cancer Society and Tobacco-Free Kids. Why? They want to include electronic cigarettes, now sold on line and at mall kiosks, that contain no tobacco, produce no smoke, and help many smokers stay off of conventional cigarettes. But because they look like cigarettes and simulate the act of smoking, these health groups, led by Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.), want them removed, a reason that <a title="Michael B. Siegel" href="http://sph.bu.edu/index.php?option=com_sphdir&amp;id=239&amp;Itemid=340&amp;INDEX=677" target="_blank">Michael B. Siegel</a>, Professor of Social and Behavioral Sciences finds foolish and twisted.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;What&#8217;s behind the FDA regulatory scheme? Philip Morris, to be exact. The nation&#8217;s largest cigarette company is pushing this legislation because it would protect the existing cigarette market from potential competition like the e-cigarettes that are becoming popular&#8230;.This is precisely why Philip Morris was brilliant in enticing &#8230;.health groups into supporting the FDA regulation of tobacco products.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Contact Michael Siegel, 617-638-5160, <a href="mailto:mbsiegel@bu.edu">mbsiegel@bu.edu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2009/05/12/could-smokeless-e-cigarettes-derail-fda-tobacco-regulation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congress moving closer for the FDA to regulate tobacco</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2009/05/11/congress-moving-closer-for-the-fda-to-regulate-tobacco/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2009/05/11/congress-moving-closer-for-the-fda-to-regulate-tobacco/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 14:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron Rosenberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/?p=325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Senate committee this week takes up a House-passed version of a bill that will give the FDA broad powers over the marketing and manufacturing of tobacco products &#8212; including full disclosure of cigarette, cigar and other tobacco product ingredients. It also would require tobacco companies to expand the size of warning labels, ban harmful [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" style="float: right" src="http://sph.bu.edu/photos/showphoto.php?username=mbsiegel" alt="" width="170" height="200" /></p>
<p>A Senate committee this week takes up a House-passed version of a bill that will give the FDA broad powers over the marketing and manufacturing of tobacco products &#8212; including full disclosure of cigarette, cigar and other tobacco product ingredients. It also would require tobacco companies to expand the size of warning labels, ban harmful chemicals, and eliminate the use of such terms as &#8220;light,&#8221; &#8220;mild&#8221; and &#8220;low.&#8221;  School of Public Health Professor <a title="Michael Siegel" href="http://sph.bu.edu/index.php?option=com_sphdir&amp;id=239&amp;Itemid=340&amp;INDEX=677" target="_blank">Michael Siegel </a>, MD, has researched and written about tobacco control and smoking policies. He is familiar with the differences between the House and Senate versions and can discuss the proposed regulations.</p>
<p>Contact Dr. Michael B. Siegel, 617-638-5160, <a href="mailto:mbsiegel@bu.edu">mbsiegel@bu.edu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2009/05/11/congress-moving-closer-for-the-fda-to-regulate-tobacco/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
