<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BU Now &#187; House of Represenatives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/tag/house-of-represenatives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow</link>
	<description>News, information and research from Boston University</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 18:14:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Financial regulatory reform showdown</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/06/21/financial-regulatory-reform-showdown/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/06/21/financial-regulatory-reform-showdown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 17:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dick Taffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Professor Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barney Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BU LAW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BU School of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrisopher Dodd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cornelius Hurley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[derivatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fed Board of Governors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial regulatory reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Represenatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morin Center for Banking and Financial Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/?p=6023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[House and Senate conferees hope to wrap up this week the final version of financial regulatory reform legislation to send to President Obama, with chairmen Barney Frank and Chris Dodd delicately trying to compromises without losing votes for the overall package.  What do about the trading of derivatives &#8211; the complex financial packages which helped sink [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-6024" src="http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/files/2010/06/stock-market-board-150x150.jpg" alt="stock market board" width="105" height="105" /><a href="http://www.house.gov/">House</a> and<a href="http://www.senate.gov/"> Senate</a> conferees hope to wrap up this week the <a title="final version" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/21/AR2010062100207_pf.html" target="_blank">final version </a>of financial regulatory reform legislation to send to President Obama, with chairmen <a href="http://www.house.gov/frank/">Barney Frank</a> and <a href="http://dodd.senate.gov/">Chris Dodd</a> delicately trying to compromises without losing votes for the overall package.  What do about the trading of derivatives &#8211; the complex financial packages which helped sink the economy &#8211; remains up in the air.  <a href="http://bu.edu/law">Law</a> Professor <a title="Cornelius Hurley" href="http://www.bu.edu/law/faculty/profiles/bios/banking/hurley.html" target="_blank">Cornelius Hurley</a>, director of the <a title="Morin Center for Banking and Financial Law" href="http://www.bu.edu/law/morincenter/" target="_self">Morin Center for Banking and Financial Law </a>and a former counsel to the <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/">Fed Board of Governors</a>, says the proposal currently in the Senate version but objected to by both the House negotiators and the White House, wouldn&#8217;t be the best for taxpayers fearing another bailout but would be better than nothing.</p>
<p><em>&#8220;If derivatives trading is such a socially useful and profitable activity ($23 billion in revenue among the five banks that dominate the market) why can’t it exist outside of bank holding companies? </em><em>The answer to the question is that it could exist in a different, nonbank setting, but, without the backing of the taxpayers, the activity would have to shed its casino-like features.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Contact  Cornelius Hurley, 617-353-5427, <a href="mailto:ckhurley@bu.edu">ckhurley@bu.edu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/06/21/financial-regulatory-reform-showdown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The FDIC&#8217;s deposit-insurance limit</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/06/16/the-fdics-deposit-insurance-limit/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/06/16/the-fdics-deposit-insurance-limit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 20:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dick Taffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Professor Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BU Law School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cornelius Hurley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fed Board of Governors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal deposit insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial reform bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Represenatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morin Center for Banking and Financial Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/?p=5974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congressional negotiators working out difference between the House and Senate financial reform bills are hammering out compromises right and left.  One would permanently (and retroactively to January 2008) move from $100,000 to $250,000 the deposit insurance on individual bank accounts.  Law Professor Cornelius Hurley, director of the Morin Center for Banking and Financial Law and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-5975" src="http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/files/2010/06/FDIC-seal.jpg" alt="FDIC seal" width="105" height="46" />Congressional negotiators working out difference between the <a href="http://www.house.gov/">House</a> and <a href="http://www.senate.gov/">Senate</a> financial reform bills are hammering out <a title="compromises" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=aiueM0Q0iGso" target="_blank">compromises </a>right and left.  One would permanently (and retroactively to January 2008) move from $100,000 to $250,000 the deposit insurance on individual bank accounts.  <a href="http://bu.edu/law">Law</a> Professor <a title="Cornelius Hurley" href="http://www.bu.edu/law/faculty/profiles/bios/banking/hurley.html" target="_blank">Cornelius Hurley</a>, director of the <a title="Morin Center for Banking and Financial Law" href="http://www.bu.edu/law/morincenter/" target="_blank">Morin Center for Banking and Financial Law </a>and a former counsel to the <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/">Fed Board of Governors</a>, doesn&#8217;t think the raised limit is a good idea.</p>
<p><em>“Permanently raising the federal deposit insurance ceiling from $100,000 to $250,000 when the Federal Deposit Insurance Fund is over $20 billion in the red is irresponsible. </em><em>By raising taxpayer-funded deposit insurance coverage &#8230; it seems the [banking] lobbyists’ messages are getting through loud and clear.”</em></p>
<p>Contact Cornelius Hurley, 617-353-5427, <a href="mailto:ckhurley@bu.edu">ckhurley@bu.edu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/06/16/the-fdics-deposit-insurance-limit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
