<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BU Now &#187; nicotine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/tag/nicotine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow</link>
	<description>News, information and research from Boston University</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 18:14:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Proposed FDA regulation of tobacco is weak</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2009/06/03/proposed-fda-regulation-of-tobacco-is-very-weak/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2009/06/03/proposed-fda-regulation-of-tobacco-is-very-weak/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 18:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron Rosenberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nicotine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philip Morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/?p=764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For Michael Siegel, MD, a long time anti-smoking advocate and professor of social and behavioral sciences, the proposed Food and Drug Administration regulation of cigarettes is really a smoke screen for Big Tobacco. Writing in the Los Angeles Times, he states that the legislation was crafted, in part, by Philip Morris in a deal with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For <a title="Michael Siegel" href="http://sph.bu.edu/index.php?option=com_sphdir&amp;id=239&amp;Itemid=340&amp;INDEX=677" target="_blank">Michael Siegel</a>, MD, a long time anti-smoking advocate and professor of social and behavioral sciences, the proposed Food and Drug Administration regulation of cigarettes is really a smoke screen for Big Tobacco. Writing in the <a title="Los Angeles Times" href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-siegel3-2009jun03,0,1905325.story" target="_blank">Los Angeles Times</a>, he states that the legislation was crafted, in part, by Philip Morris in a deal with health groups, notably the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, as there is no mandate to eliminate nicotine, and limited reduction of toxins and carcinogens in tobacco.</p>
<p>Contact Michael Siegel, (617) 638-5160, mbsiegel@bu.edu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2009/06/03/proposed-fda-regulation-of-tobacco-is-very-weak/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The battle over non-tobacco E-cigarettes at the FDA</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2009/06/02/the-battle-over-non-tobacco-e-cigarettes-at-the-fda/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2009/06/02/the-battle-over-non-tobacco-e-cigarettes-at-the-fda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron Rosenberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carcinogens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-cigarettes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nicotine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/?p=675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Smokeless, tobacco-free, electronic (battery-powered) cigarettes that deliver a mixture of nicotine and water vapor but no carcinogens are part of the Senate debate over the proposed Food and Drug Administration tobacco regulations. Michael Siegel, MD, MPH, professor of socal and behavioral sciences, maintains they are a life-saving alternative for many smokers. Michael Siegel, 617-638-5160, mbsiegel@bu.edu]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Smokeless, tobacco-free, electronic (battery-powered)" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/02/us/02cigarette.html?ref=us" target="_blank">Smokeless, tobacco-free, electronic (battery-powered) cigarettes </a>that deliver a mixture of nicotine and water vapor but no carcinogens are part of the Senate debate over the proposed Food and Drug Administration tobacco regulations. <a title="Michael Siegel" href="http://sph.bu.edu/index.php?option=com_sphdir&amp;id=239&amp;Itemid=340&amp;INDEX=677" target="_blank">Michael Siegel</a>, MD, MPH, professor of socal and behavioral sciences, maintains they are a life-saving alternative for many smokers.</p>
<p>Michael Siegel, 617-638-5160, <a href="mailto:mbsiegel@bu.edu">mbsiegel@bu.edu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2009/06/02/the-battle-over-non-tobacco-e-cigarettes-at-the-fda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
