<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BU Now &#187; Project for Excellence in Journalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/tag/project-for-excellence-in-journalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow</link>
	<description>News, information and research from Boston University</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 18:14:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>BU and PEJ release report on election coverage</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/04/20/bu-releases-report-with-pej-on-senate-election-coverage/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/04/20/bu-releases-report-with-pej-on-senate-election-coverage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kira Jastive</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Professor Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martha Coakley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts senate election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project for Excellence in Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Kennedy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/?p=5233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study produced by Boston University and the Project for Excellence in Journalism that outlines media coverage of the Massachusetts special senate election has revealed some interesting points about the recent race.   According to the report, national media initially lost interest in a &#8220;fairly dull and utterly local contest.&#8221;  But, &#8220;when it became [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-5235" src="http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/files/2010/04/1_Lead_chart-150x150.png" alt="1_Lead_chart" width="150" height="150" />A new <a href="http://www.journalism.org/analysis_report/hiding_plain_sight_kennedy_brown">study</a> produced by Boston University and the <a href="http://www.journalism.org/">Project for Excellence in Journalism</a> that outlines media coverage of the Massachusetts special senate election has revealed some interesting points about the recent race.   According to the report, <span style="font-size: 12px">national media initially lost interest in a &#8220;fairly dull and utterly local contest.&#8221;  But, &#8220;when it became clear something was up, it was polling—not journalistic reporting—that caught the wave in the race to succeed Kennedy.&#8221;</span></p>
<p style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-size: small">For more information, contact: Tobe Berkovitz, 617-353-7724, <a href="tobetv@bu.edu">tobetv@bu.edu</a>.</span></p>
<p style="font-size: 12px">
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/04/20/bu-releases-report-with-pej-on-senate-election-coverage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
