<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BU Now &#187; regulatory oversight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/tag/regulatory-oversight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow</link>
	<description>News, information and research from Boston University</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 18:14:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The weak link in bank reform</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/07/08/the-weak-link-in-bank-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/07/08/the-weak-link-in-bank-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 18:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dick Taffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Professor Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial regulatory reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hedge funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory oversight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/?p=6289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The financial regulatory reform legislation likely to be sent soon to President Obama calls for the biggest banks and hedge funds to put up some $20 billion in fees to pay the costs of additional oversight by regulators.  But even that won&#8217;t help regulators don&#8217;t quickly upgrade the training and standards of rank-and-file examiners, says Mark [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-6290" src="http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/files/2010/07/federal-reserve-400-150x150.jpg" alt="federal-reserve-400" width="120" height="120" />The financial regulatory reform legislation likely to be sent soon to President Obama calls for the biggest banks and hedge funds to put up some $20 billion in fees to pay the costs of additional oversight by regulators.  But even that won&#8217;t help regulators don&#8217;t quickly upgrade the training and standards of rank-and-file examiners, says <a title="Mark Williams" href="http://smgnet.bu.edu/mgmt_new/profiles/WilliamsMark.html" target="_blank">Mark Williams</a>, a former Fed examiner who now teaches finance in the School of Management.  In a <em>Boston Globe</em> <a title="op-ed" href="http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2010/07/08/the_weak_link_in_bank_reform/" target="_blank">op-ed</a>, Williams &#8212; author of &#8220;<em><a title="Uncontrolled Risk" href="http://www.uncontrolledrisk.com/" target="_blank">Uncontrolled Risk</a></em>&#8221; about the fall of Lehman Brothers &#8212; says if bank examiner performance over the last decade is an indicator, oversight may prove grossly inadequate unless the regulators become as financial sophisticated as those they&#8217;re supposed to regulate.</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Our entire financial system is dependent on strengthening regulator oversight and closing this sophistication gap.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Contact Mark Williams 617-358-2789, <a href="mailto:williams@bu.edu">williams@bu.edu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bu.edu/bunow/2010/07/08/the-weak-link-in-bank-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
