Improvisation in Performance

Over my Winter Break, I spent a full week in Philadelphia studying Movement Improvisation in Performance.  Included in this work was Contact Improvisation and Authentic Movement.  As a performer, it was one of the most liberating experiences I’ve had in a while.

I don’t want to talk about CI too much, but just to give a little background, it was first developed and codified in 1972 by Steve Paxton, who was a dancer from the Judson Church Dance Theatre scene.  “Authentic movement is an expressive improvisational movement practice that allows a group of participants a type of free association of the body.”  It’s a very spiritual practice in which a witness watches their partner, who has their eyes closed, do whatever they want for fifteen minutes.  If you have any curiosities about this, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO ASK!!

The artists I worked with during that week were Ishmael Houston-Jones and Yvonne Meier, who are extremely famous dance improvisers who made their claim to fame in the 80’s.  I had only heard great things about them and their work before the workshops.  The Philly Dance Community has a wonderful High-Tea event that serves as a discussion with visiting artists once a month, and the guests were of course Yvonne and Ishmael, so I had an opportunity to get to know them more then.  I clearly remember asking Ishmael what he valued most in work, and he said, “Authenticity and Risk.”  I was in total agreement.

After seeing their work, however, I feel differently.  Ishmael sent me a video of a PS 122 revival of his work called “THEM.”  I wasn’t totally impressed.  The dance improvisation was impressive, yet it all existed with the same timing and rhythms.  I love improvisation…but I felt as if no one was really saying anything.  It was as if the artist wasn’t making a stand.  Yvonne Meier’s work is similar in that it is entertaining, but that she doesn’t express her voice clearly enough.  After talking with a friend, we realized what we were missing: Vigor.  And maybe set choreography.

As a dance theatre artist who loved doing this work, and got something out of it emotionally, I am on a quest to find how these practices can translate directly into performance.  I fully understand how they can be used off the stage, but I want to discover how these forms may illuminate ideas more effectively than set material.

Here are a few links I have posted to further illuminate this topic:

Ishmael Houston Jones’ website (It’s actually fantastic!!!)

THEM at PS122

Yvonne Meier performing

Yvonne Meier’s famous “Scores”

A recent review of their works in the NY Times (that follows my line of reasoning)

Please comment if you have feelings about their work!

The Lasting Mark of “Green Eyes”

One of my New Year’s Resolutions this year, besides eating a salad every day and going to FitRec twice a week (spoiler: I haven’t been yet), is to see more theatre in Boston outside of BU. I decided to start early with Company One’s production of Tennessee Williams’ Green Eyes. The concept was exciting to me because the production is set in a hotel room in the Ames Hotel. This restrictive space allows for only 25 seats per performance, and I was so happy to be able to get one.

From the first moment both actors were present, when Claude sat in bed frighteningly still, the tension in the room never dissipated. By the end, the play literally knocked me off my chair. I was seated on a riser, and I kept moving my chair backwards in an attempt to put some distance between myself and the crazy violent sexual power-play going on in front of me. In the play’s final moments, I had gone as far as I could, and the back legs slipped off the riser. But even this incident could not take me out of the world of the play.

There are so many angles one could take when talking about this play, but the theme that has stayed with me the most is the intersection between violence and desire, pleasure and pain. This was perfectly visualized in the sight of Mrs. Dunphey’s bruised, scratched body. She undresses in the first moments of the play, and remains only barely covered for the remainder. Her body, clothed in a sheer white robe, would seem to be an object of sexual desire, but whenever the fabric would slip and reveal a dark bruise or startling scratch, her flesh suddenly became something scary, and almost repulsive. The imprints of fingers on her waist and the slashes on one of her breasts were especially disturbing. The action that was taking place in front of us was horrifying, but the evidence of what had happened before was even more so.

The quick shifts between play and violence, screams of laughter, fear and passion created a sense of unease that permeated the room and stayed with me as I left the theatre. Even now, a few days later, I can see the image of the actress’s bruised body in my mind, and my stomach still twists when I think of it. Overall, perhaps not the most enjoyable night at the theatre, but certainly one that left a lasting impression.

“Red Tails”: A closer look

Part 1: Red Tails market campaigns-- “Sh*t White Execs said to George Lucas.”

In the social media world there has been a recent trend of viral videos that address social issues under the theme, “Sh*t ____ say to ______.” My favorite one being, "Sh*t White Girls Say...to Black Girls." Marketers for the new movie Red Tails decided to rift off this trend, creating "Sh*t White Execs said to George Lucas."  The video uses satire to draw attention to the ignorance white Hollywood producers displayed towards the production of Red Tails. Watching this makes me cringe. It’s truly ashamed how political and racialized the entertainment industry can be.

What upsets me the most about this marketing campaign is not necessarily the racial statements said, although I was offended, but the racial undertone of the campaign itself. The campaign guilt trips audiences into attending the film by angering them with the racist remarks made by Hollywood producers. In doing so the creators are operating off of the assumptions that blacks are easily angered and ill tempered. This idea is deeply rooted in the historical racist beliefs that blacks are aggressive unrefined individuals, who are easily provoked, and reactionary. This video also functions off of the assumption that minorities do not attend movies, unless propelled to do so, an assumption that is not fair. Perhaps they figured “it’s provocative—it gets the people going!” as Kanye West says in his song N*ggas in Paris.

Now whether sparked by guilt or just a personal interest to see the film, Red Tails proved to be a major success at the box offices this past weekend. The first all black action movie grossed an unexpected $19.1 million in its opening weekend.

On many occasions George Lucas spoke-out candidly about the difficulties he faced while producing Red Tails-- a project that took him 23 years and 58 million dollars of his personal dollars to bring to fruition. Specifically in his interview on The Daily Show, Lucas pulls the race card when he discusses the resistance he received from Hollywood in the production of this movie. He uses racial inequality as the motivating factor to get the black community to support Red Tails, a tactic he overly and unwisely used. Now Historically Black Colleges/Universities are challenging Lucas to literally put his money where his mouth is, by demanding that he invest 15 percent of box office proceeds to HBCU’s that offer film studies programs. While for the record, I don’t necessarily agree with this challenge. I am interested to watch how Lucas responds, because if he were truly fighting against racial injustices in Hollywood, it would make sense for him to invest in diversifying Hollywood.

Don’t get me wrong; I applaud Lucas for his dedication to seeing this story come to life. However it is still sad to say that one of the black community’s leading directors and filmmakers, Spike Lee, can produce a film like Miracle at St. Anna and not be recognized for his work. Even though the acting and production value far exceeded that of Red Tails. The film told the story of paid homage to the all-black 92nd Division, which fought on the ground in Italy.

I question, why it took a white male backing this black picture to bring it life? I don’t have the answers to these questions, but I wonder what accounts for the disparity in funding for black films? Is it there isn't an audience for these stories?

Oscar nominated actress, Viola Davis, brought up an interesting point in Newsweek’s Oscar roundtable this past week on the topic of being black in Hollywood. When asked “Do you think race still plays a part in your castability?” Davis replied, “There aren’t a lot of leading role s for African-American women. African-Americans make up about 12.5 percent of the population, and that is not the demographic we’re targeting in movie/television/entertainment industry.” In this response she raises important questions about the assumptions that filmmakers are operating under. They seem to be aiming at the lowest common denominator and forget about the smaller demographics, so what they produce is not representative of their true audience base.

Red Tails certainly opened up a fruitful discussion around race in the film and television industry. It also brought to light that we must critically examine and reconsider the assumptions we base our decisions off of.

Part 2: Personal response to the film

With all the buzz flying around the recent film Red Tails I had to see go see it. After watching the film, I would give the production a 4 out of 10.

Aaron McGuder, the creator of The Boondocks, who very little people know actually co-wrote Red Tails with George Lucas was quoted as saying in a brief interview at the NYC red carpet premier of the film, “We wanted to take it (the film) from being a heavy historical drama, to being more of an action adventure, comedic, but not necessarily a comedy…but a classic George Lucas movie.” For my money, Aaron McGuder is a brilliantly educated and politically savvy young man, but after seeing the film I take issue with his statement. Firstly, why are we attempting to take story that is not a classic George Lucas story, and turn it into a classic George Lucas film?

While I understand the emphasis on universality the creators wanted to stress, in all their zeal to make this film an All-American blockbuster, that was simply told by a predominately black cast, they neglected to address the historical relevancy of the Tuskegee Airmen. There wasn’t a single caption in the film. At least when I saw Frost/Nixon, a movie I love, there were plenty of historical captions that provided me with the context I needed to understand the gravity of the water-gate scandal.

Since there was very little monetary backing for the production of Red Tails, it is entirely possible that they didn’t have enough money to include captions. However, I am of the opinion that they could’ve given up the cost of one exploding plane or special effect, to give this story the historical footing it needed to be truly effective. Because despite being an American story, many students graduate from high school and even college not knowing who the Tuskegee Airmen were. Under these circumstances, we can’t pretend that a segment of history that has essentially been “blacked-out” of our history textbooks is common knowledge, and that audiences will enter into the theatre with a basic understanding of the historical context.

However in Lucas’s defense Red Tails was intended to be one part of a trilogy that tells the complete story of the Tuskegee airmen, but without proper funding that could not be done. With a successful run at the box office, I am curious to see if both the prequel and sequel will actually be made after this production.

Opera Boston Closing

Opera Boston recently announced that due to a $500,000 budget deficit, they will be closing. This is not only sad news for opera lovers, but it could also have a significant impact on students choosing to study opera in Boston.

Students graduating from opera programs at Boston Conservatory, Berkley, and Boston University will have fewer places to find work upon graduation.There are other opera companies in Boston, but places like Boston Lyric Opera do not hire singers who have little professional experience, as often as Opera Boston did.

One of the reasons students come to Boston to study opera is the wealth of professional opportunities that exist after graduation.

Perhaps, students will reconsider coming to Boston for school because of Opera Boston’s closing.

And, how will this impact our own program at BU? For many of our own School of Theatre Students The Opera Institute offers the biggest production experiences available during their education at BU. If that were to change, would Design and Production students reconsider coming to BU? Would the quality of our program be lessened?


The Prospero Project

The Prospero Project

So I initially looked into this story because of it's subtitle on ArtsJournalDaily: "Can theatre save Europe?"  Disclaimer, the piece does not really explore that idea it's just the clever button on the end of it, I think it is a part of a larger conversation regarding the role of culture in reviving the European economy of which I at least am not up to speed on.  It is a little difficult to understand exactly what the project is, as I understand it the theaters involved engage in a "theatrical exchange" of sorts where they send actors, directors, interns, playwrights etc to work at each others theaters, but the centerpiece of the project, I believe, is that the six theaters produce pieces together that then tour each others cities.  What's so exciting about it in my mind is the effect collaboration on this level could have on the proliferation of theatre around the world.  I've been thinking so much about the future lately and my feelings about what I want to do change daily.  The past week I've been thinking a lot about being bold with my aspirations and dreaming beyond "New York or LA?"  I think about classes like this one, Dramaturgy, Drama Crit, and I feel a strong pull towards a path that would allow me participate in the theatrical traditions and history we study in these classes, pursuing something in academia, looking into programs in Europe, etc.  In Theater Management Michael Maso was talking about the extremely minimal effects the recession has had on Broadway, I don't think the question posed in the subtitle is a crazy one.  If more programs like this develop, that take place on a grand scale, are commercially viable, and not as artless as the majority of Broadway I think theater can be taken exciting new places recognized for it's essential value to society.

Prop ‘8’- A play

1.157855

As most of you probably know, this quarter Elaine Vaan Hogue is directing a play  by Emily Mann called Execution of Justice.  Most of the script is comprised of the trial of the People vs. Dan White.  White assassinated San Francisco mayor George Moscone and openly gay city supervisor Harvey Milk in November 1978.

I'm lucky enough to be part of this production, and I've been thinking about what it means to do this play at this point in time- why this story needs to be told now- so I was really excited to find that a similar play is currently emerging entitled '8' written by Dustin Lance Black, chronicling the 2010 federal court battle that dealt with the legality of Proposition 8 in California.  Its first production was on Broadway with a star-studded cast that included Morgan Freedman, and raised over $1 for American Foundation for Equal Rights. '8' then appeared in Los Angles with George Clooney, and is now "coming to a theatre near you"

'8' seems to be in a very similar format to Execution of Justice, using text directly from the trial, which was actually recorded but its release was suppressed by supporters of Prop 8.  '8' is a chance for audience to see what actually happened in that trial.

I found it really interesting that '8' will be traveling to states that are marriage equality 'hotspots'; I'm not sure if the goal is to change people's minds on the issue of gay marriage or to raise awareness and money within the community that are already supporters. The later seems more probable to me, I imagine it would be very difficult to actually get conservative audiences into the theatre... although George Clooney might help.

Boston’s Spring Season

Students often ask me what shows I'd recommend out in the wilds of Boston, beyond the inertia of the university. Here's my list for Spring 2012. It's not exhaustive, and focuses on contemporary & new work rather than classics.

ArtsEmerson

- Sugar by Robbie McCauley: Jan 20-29

- 69 South (The Shakelton Project) by Phantom Limb: Feb 7-12

- Ameriville by Universes: March 13-18

- The Andersen Project by Robert Lepage & Ex Machina: March 24-April 1

- Café Variations by Charles Mee/SITI Company: April 13-2

Company One

- Hookman by Lauren Yee: March 23-April 14

- Articulation: Illuminated by ARTiculation: April 20-May 5

- Love Person by Aditi Kapil

- The Elaborate Entrance of Chad Deity by Kris Diaz

Boston Center for the Arts

- Bread & Puppet Theatre: Attica; Man of Flesh & Cardboard; Man=Carrot Jan 23-29 (use code BPFLYER2012 for discount)

Lyric Stage Boston

Superior Donuts by Tracy Letts: Jan 6-Feb 4

The Tempermentals by Jon Marans: March 30-April 28

Whistler in the Dark

- Fen and A Number by Caryl Churchill: Jan 20-Feb 4

SpeakEasy Stage

- Red by John Logan: Jan 6-Feb 4

- Next to Normal by Tom Kitt: March 9-April 7

New Rep

- Art by Yasmina Reza: Jan 15-Feb 5

Huntington Theatre

- God of Carnage by Yasmina Reza: Jan 6-Feb 5

- Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom by August Wilson: March 9- April 8

- The Luck of the Irish by Kirsten Greenidge: March 30-April 29

A.R.T.

- Wild Swans by Alexandra Wood: Feb 11-March 11

- Futurity: a Musical by The Lisps: March 16-April 15

Digital Dramaturgy Round Up

The fall semester is over, and that means that the blog authors of the last few months are moving on as well. The majority of them are even now winging their ways to various semester-abroad programs. (We hope they don't forget us.) However, before making this blog's between-semester hiatus official, I wanted to share links to a few of the digital dramaturgy projects created by these students.

This is the first year I asked the dramaturgy class to go largely digital, and the results have been great. In no particular order, here are some examples of dramaturgy websites & blogs created for hypothetical productions:

Edufa by Efua Sutherland, dramaturged by Antonia Lassar

Ajax in Iraq by Ellen McLaughlin, dramaturged by Jessica Wolf

The Erpingham Camp by Joe Orton, dramaturged by Arthur Siegel

Medea by Heiner Muller, dramaturged by Chloe Fuller

Medea by Charles Ludlam, dramaturged by Stuart Meyers

Hillary: A Modern Greek Tragedy With a (Somewhat) Happy Ending by Wendy Weiner, dramaturged by Joel Cote

I hope these sites add to the bank of online knowledge about these intriguing plays.

This blog will be on break for a few weeks, and will resume its life when classes resume in late January, when it will be authored by the students of the Contemporary Drama course.  See you then!

winter

Marlon Riggs

Has anyone, besides me, heard of the wonderful filmmaker and poet Marlon Riggs?  I hadn't until today, when I came upon his film, Tongues Untied, on ubuweb (which is an unbelievable source for films, sounds, essays and information on artists and the arts).

In this film, Marlon Riggs and his friends investigate their feelings surrounding the question of what it means to be black and gay in America.  Song, dance, monologue and candid performances seamlessly paint a pastiche of a black, gay experience between the 80's and 90's.  It was a mesmerizing and moving portrait, and although it was created from a point of view that is not my own, I felt deeply connected to it.

I was very excited to learn that this was a film aired publicly on PBS.  Does this kind of thing still happen today?  I have a feeling it doesn't, especially since this film was slammed by right-winged conservatives.  Buchanan even used it in a campaign against George Bush Sr!  I wish films like this were still made public.  If this film isn't being shown to document "fringe" experiences, what is?

Apparently I'm behind the times, since a friend told me that this film is canonical in queer theory.  I didn't know about it, so even if you do, I thought it would be nice to share.  Enjoy!

Tongues Untied

A New Festival to Promote New Works

In January, New York plays host to multiple theatre festivals as well as international theatre festivals. This year, it seems that the month of January will get even busier with the introduction of the Times Square International Theatre Festival. This festival, which will be located on West 43rd Street will run from January 16th-22nd.

Roy Arias is spearheading the entire program and hopes to bring together many countries under the umbrella of theatre and the arts. Three continents will be represented at this festival. Actors and the Arts will be represented from all over the world. Some will include: India, Argentina, Puerto Rico, Cuba, Ukraine, Germany, Hungary, Iran, and France. All of the countries listed either have actors, artists, directors, or playwrights representing them, or the thematic content of the pieces deals with these specific cultures.

All over the world, each and every country has their own way of dealing with the arts and the performing arts. However, it seems that there isn't one particular way to unify all of these wonderful ideas under one roof. Hopefully, this festival will continue to grow so we can really embrace a sense of ensemble throughout the world.

The Rebirth of Good Theatre.

I read an article today entitled "Without Hype, Playwriting Thrives" in the New York Times' Arts Beat Blog. This article resonated with me very deeply. Written by Charles Isherwood, this critic takes a look back at theatre during 2011, and discovers many surprises as he reminisces...

After making a list of his favorite works over the last 12 months, for the first time in a long time, Isherwood was pleased to share that his list of favorite shows this year did not include one revival, nor one musical. This demonstrates that after a lull, theatre is truly making a comeback.

In the last few years, Broadway has attempted to produce shows that they hoped would be box office hits that appealed to as many people as possible. As a result, there seemed to be a great lack of artistry in these works. Instead, musicals like Shrek, Spider-Man, and others have attempted to lure in as many people as possible to generate a profit. In doing so, the theatre was extremely underwhelming. However, in the list that Isherwood puts together, he highlights the years most provocative, new works that reminds us artists that there is still hope yet and the revival of theatre itself is on its way up...

Below, I have included his list of new plays and a small brief on each of them. Reading this article has really allowed me to narrow in on what I want to see the next time I'm able to make it to the city. My only hope is that these stellar new works will still be running...But thats an entirely different fish to fry...

‘BELLEVILLE’ Amy Herzog emerged in just a little over a year as a fully developed playwriting talent. Last year her “After the Revolution” made my list, and this year she wrote two plays of distinction, in intriguingly different styles. “Belleville,” which I saw during its premiere run at Yale Repertory Theater, blends elements of a straight-up psychological thriller into a keenly observed examination of a young couple’s disintegrating marriage.

‘BENGAL TIGER AT THE BAGHDAD ZOO’ Rajiv Joseph’s dark comedy about the chaos consuming the lives of soldiers and one grumpy tiger in the immediate aftermath of the American invasion of Iraq was a challenge for Broadway audiences, even with the beloved comic actor Robin Williams portraying the feline victim. But this richly imagined play, directed with finesse by Moisés Kaufman, depicted with a bold lyricism the murky world of warfare from the perspective of both the soldiers on the ground and the Iraqi citizens.

‘BLOOD AND GIFTS’ J. T. Rogers’s incisive study of the roots of the American involvement in Afghanistan was as dramatically engaging as it was rooted in the complex history of the region. Bartlett Sher’s lucid hand at the helm, and a winning performance by Jefferson Mays as a jaded British operative straight from the pages of a Graham Greene novel, helped turn what might have been a dry history lesson into an evening of theater that entertained even more than it edified.

‘4000 MILES’ The second of Ms. Herzog’s plays to make my list, this delicately drawncomedy-drama featured superlative performances by the veteran Mary Louise Wilson, as an aging lefty grandmother, and the talented newcomer Gabriel Ebert as her grandson. Their genial relationship deepens when he spends a few weeks in her New York apartment after a cross-country bike trip marred by tragedy. The best news: this wise, funny and heartfelt play will return to Lincoln Center Theater in the spring, with the cast intact.

‘JERUSALEM’ Mark Rylance is an actor of such protean gifts that he manages to turn his Tony acceptance speeches into quirky displays of bravura (albeit slightly irritating ones). In the roistering Rooster of Jez Butterworth’s elegiac play about the dimming fortunes of an England in decline — the lone London import on my list — he gave one of the great performances of the year, finding the spiritual beauty in a study in willful dissipation.

‘KIN’ Bathsheba Doran’s ensemble comedy-drama was an evocative exploration of the manner in which each human life touches gently on innumerable others. Sam Gold, who has become a sought-after director for his ability to mine every nuance of feeling in this kind of layered, naturalistic play, was at his finest here, bringing his tender, whispering touch to Ms. Doran’s story of interlocking lives.

‘THE ____________ WITH THE HAT’ Stephen Adly Guirgis’s comedy with the unprintable name was worth every four-letter word. An exhilarating head rush of a play, expertly directed by Anna D. Shapiro, it was enlivened even further by a fiery performance from Bobby Cannavale as an ex-con fighting to stay sober and keep the tenuous lifeline connecting him to his equally troubled ex-girlfriend from snapping.

‘SONS OF THE PROPHET’ In the standout play of the fall season, the playwright Stephen Karam depicted a kaleidoscope of human suffering with both biting humor and boundless compassion. The gifted actor Santino Fontana led a flawless cast, portraying a young man plagued by a mysterious ailment who also has to cope with the sudden death of his father, the failing health of a troublesome uncle, and a needy boss also battling the brutal fates.

‘VENUS IN FUR’ David Ives brought a moribund Broadway genre, the sex comedy, roaring back to life with his sneaky two-hander about a sexually fraught encounter between a desperate but calculating actress and a high-handed playwright-director. Reprising the role that made her a name to watch when the play was first produced Off Broadway, Nina Arianda gives a performance that reaffirms one’s belief in that elusive thing known as star quality.

‘THE WALK ACROSS AMERICA FOR MOTHER EARTH’ The only true downtown entry on my list, this insightful, gently satiric and play by the drag performer and writer Taylor Mac depicted a ragged band of freak-flag-waving activists treading from coast to coast to protest the depredations being visited on the planet. With this fully realized play, Mr. Mack established himself as a dramatist of more expansive gifts than even his most ardent followers might have imagined.

Risk and Theatre

I found an article on the NY Times ArtBeat section that starts out with a bold statement that really encompasses the theatre world from this season: "This was a year for celebrating both the enduring power of traditional theater and the creative stealth bombs that can be planted within it, for putting new and explosive life into classic vessels." The productions that have happened have been really risk-taking, taking on topics that aren't the most common. It shows that the world is ready to take on something new, and not focus on redoing the safe shows that everyone does. I think the fact that people have moved out of their sheltered worlds and embraced the offensive reflects where we are as a society.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/18/theater/traditional-theater-sometimes-with-stealth-bombs.html?ref=theater

Is is… Hamlet??

Okokokokok!!! What an interesting controversy this is!

Apparently, a man in Russia is suing the Academy Drama Theatre for their production of "Hamlet," claiming that no one warned him it would be such a deviation from the original "Hamlet that he was expecting to see. The man was particularly shocked and angered by the raping of Ophelia and the singing of the gravediggers in the production, as well as the several scenes that appeared in the production that are not a part of the original "Hamlet."

And I do have to say... although I think legal action is a bit excessive, I do think he's right. Or.. well, I don't know! I think he's right at least. Or rather, I think this theatre company is doing a real disservice to themselves. While the re-imagining of classic works like "Hamlet" is both something that happens ALLLLLL the time, and something that I personally think necessary to keep our relationship to Shakespeare fresh, there is something really important about a theatre company defining themselves. Although we, as theatre artists, mostly take it upon ourselves to research the shows we are going to see (or we've at least usually heard something about the show), it's hard to remember that not everyone who sees theatre does that. Although I don't believe it should be a requirement, I think theatre companies alienate a lot of potential supporters by not clearly explaining what might occur in their productions. Not that pages and pages of explanations are required, but a blurb saying that this production was an adaptation could have probably helped this man a lot!

This is really useful for me in defining my own work. You never know who you might offend -- and although it may not always be your fault, there are always steps we can make to be sure that we don't surprise the people who don't ever want to be surprised.

Non-Profit Theatre Making a Profit

17NONPROFIT1-articleLargeWhen Chloe and I were in New York last month, we waited in line for a few hours to try and get student rush tickets to Venus in Fur at the Manhattan Theatre Club. We were shunned. The show (which closes tomorrow) has had an incredibly popular and successful run on Broadway for the past few weeks. It's one of a series of shows on Broadway that are part of non-profit theatre companies making a splash on the Great White Way. The big thing about non-profit theatre is that it is subscriber based. Their seasons are pre-planned with each show having a confirmed open and close date. However, with theatre companies like Lincoln Center, the MTC, and the Public having such smash hits on their hands, they're finding ways to extend the runs and continue rolling in the bank. Shows like War Horse, Anything Goes, and Venus in Fur are being extended long past what their subscribers has believed.

I don't know how I feel about this. On the one hand, thank God I have another chance to go back to New York and see these shows. If they were to actually close when they were supposed to, I would miss them. On the other hand, what about the new shows that are supposed to be in those time brackets? Are they being pushed aside for profit? What if that show is the next big piece of theatre to change the world? Because of these decisions, respectable non-profits are looking like profit-making, Tony-seeking hit factories. But is that such a bad thing? I don't know that it is. If they're able to create this new and innovative work, and people are flocking to see it, that's one small step for man and one giant leap for mankind.

This NYT article highlights the successes of these non-profits and illuminated me to my own thoughts on the subject. I think I can empathize most strongly with this subscriber:

“I can appreciate longer runs because it gives me a chance to see a play that might otherwise close after a six-week run, but I so worry about new plays that are getting crowded out,” said Kathy Flynn, who subscribes to both Manhattan Theater Club and the Public Theater. “I used to think that these nonprofit theaters were all about producing new plays. Now they seem to be in the hit business.”

I don't want the new plays to be "crowded out", but I want to be able to see the stuff that's going on now. At the end of the day, it's always about money. People don't think they make enough and there's not enough to go around. It's just unfortunate that even the non-profits seem to be dragged into all this money-business now.

....doesn't mean I still don't want to see Venus when it's back in February though...

Inventing a Concordance, Not Just Compiling One

Though the process of creating a dramaturgical guide for our final project was both grueling and time consuming, it was probably one of the things I'm most proud of in my time here at BU. I learned so much about the world from my research, and I learned so much about myself as an artist through the creation of my imaginary production. However, I'm pretty positive my favorite part of the whole thing was compiling my concordance (as many of you whom I studied with in the library all night already know). I've always loved expanding my vocabulary and I'm a sucker for organization so the process was very serene for me. Now that the project is handed in, and I'm back to getting to spend some much needed time in front of the TV, I'll be watching shows that are my "brain-candy." A show I'm particularly excited to see back on the air is HBO's Game of Thrones. While reading through the Arts Beat blog the other day, I found this incredible article about the language that a certain group of characters speak on the show.

The language is called Dothraki, and until I read this article, I would have thought that it was a random serious of sounds and articulators thrown together. In fact, the language was created by a man named David Peterson who studied linguistics at UCSD and has spent his life creating entirely new languages. He is a "conlanger", a person who constructs new languages. With a rise in fantasy and science-fiction based entertainment, the need to create new languages for television and movies is weirdly very high. These conlangers don't just combine sounds randomly; they have specific grammatical structures upon which their entire languages are based. Because of this, these languages are actually becoming speakable. Paul Frommer, who created the language that the Na'vi speak in Avatar met with a group of fans who are fluent in his own language:

  • "Last October, a group of Na’vi speakers from half a dozen countries convened in Sonoma County, Calif., for a gathering known as “Teach the Teachers.” Mr. Frommer gave attendants tips on grammar and vocabulary and fielded any questions they had about the language. The rural, wooded setting felt “almost like being on Pandora,” he said. At a question-and-answer session in July that he participated in, at least a dozen attendants rattled off their questions in fluent Na’vi."

I think it's really interesting to note that companies like HBO and Twentieth Century Fox are taking an invested interest in the invented languages of their products. The authenticity is vital to the believability of their work and they're willing to put in the effort to ensure that. I found this article really inspiring and exciting if only for the fact that I can add the word "conlanger" to my own personal concordance.

I understand that because of today's media and entertainment, children are exposed to more violence than ever before.  I also understand that little can be done to rectify it now because it is such an enormous trend.  To be honest, it doesn't bother me all too much, having been raised in the culture of Power Rangers and Nintendo 64 first person shooting games.  However, this really upsets me.

"It was the blow job joke that did it. Admittedly, the RSC's new winter show, The Heart of Robin Hood, had signalled from the start that we weren't in for wholesome derring-do amid dappled sunshine. Within the first few minutes our ungallant hero had shot dead a monk with an arrow through the eye. Shortly after, soldiers threatened two blubbing children under the revolving toes of their hanged father. A realistic decapitation drew a few gasps but was swiftly topped by a brutal de-tonguing, in which the ravaged appendage was gaily waved about as the victim's mouth frothed with blood. But it was when King John started to make bobbing hand gestures, pantomiming his lascivious nature, that I saw several adults around me pursing their lips."

Many of us choose to do theatre because we love that we are sharing a personal experience with the audience.  That's why I find this so uncomfortable.  This show that states it is appropriate for kids seven and up, is inevitably leaving a more potent impression than a violent cartoon or slightly sexual TV show.  These kids are watching real life people performing these stunts right in front of them.  Theatre is extremely personal, which is what makes it beautiful, and that is what separates it from television and film.  Therefore, I think the artists involved should have taken into account that it cannot treat the production like a cartoon.

Oh, COME ON! This is kind of ridiculous.

Hugh Jackman's one man show, Hugh Jackman: Back On Broadway, is filling up the Booth Theatre.  Jackman is certainly a triple threat so it comes as no surprise to me that not only is he in the spotlight on Broadway, but also that the reviews are so positive.  However, one reviewer wrote an article on the musical revue that is receiving more online attention than the show itself.  "New York Times theatre critic Ben Brantley has created controversy bysuggesting Hugh Jackman behaves like 'a flaming queen' in his one-man Broadway revue. 'Let's face it,' Brantley wrote of the actor, whose solo show Hugh Jackman: Back on Broadway is regularly breaking sales records at the Booth Theatre in New York, 'Mr Jackman is, unapologetically and triumphantly, the bi-est guy in town: bicultural, bimorphic, binational, biprofessional and, for entertainment purposes, bisexual.'"

Since the publication of his article, Brantley has been consistently condemned for his comments, or at least, word choice.  He's being called a homophobe, among other unappealing things.  I am simply very confused about why this is causing so much hubbub.

Brantley explicitly states in his article that he was not referring to the the actor's sexuality, but to the demeanor associated with being gay or bisexual.  In my opinion, that says it all.  He's not calling Jackman gay, he's only saying that the star is abundantly comfortable with his love for musical theatre, performing, and other things associated with being gay or bi.  HE WAS EXPLICIT IN THAT.

On another note, why is it so goddamn important that these words were used to describe a straight actor?  I think that these people who are condemning Brantley for his word choice are giving too much power to the words in the first place.  As if that being associated with this liminal identities is a negative thing.  Everyone knows that Hugh Jackman is a happily married straight man.  That is indisputable.  Big f-ing deal if one critic describes him as bi.  There is nothing wrong with being bi in the first place, so... Cut it out and quit your whining.

all or nothing

dwarves_2085550b

Earlier when I was looking through articles I found one that made me sort of uncomfortable and I wasn’t going to deal with it at all.  But, I’ve decided to against myself to try to work through this one.  Ok.  So Wolverhampton's Grand Theatre was doing a production of Snow White, and they had to fire their dwarf actors because they said it was too expensive.  They replaced the dwarfs with children actors wearing masks with prerecorded lines.  All right.  Ok.  Here’s my first reaction.  Why are dwarf actors more “expensive” than…non-dwarf actors?  This is not a bash on Wolverhampton's Grand Theatre.  I tried to find out more about the financial situation of the dwarf actor and wasn’t surprised that I couldn’t anything.  I understand why they would be paid more if they were.  Because, in reality, there are not as many roles out there for dwarf actors, so their time would cost more because of this?  But doesn’t this widen the gap between who are still considered minorities?  I want to think that all actors should be treated the same, but I feel like that’s sort of a naïve idea.  That all men are created equal, so they should all be paid according to plan right?  Or no?  But humans are humans, and I don’t think one should be paid more for their time because they fit the part better.  I was also surprised by how the people responded to the switch of actors and how many of them were upset by it.  Saying that it is pointless to see a “professional” production of Snow White if the dwarfs aren’t going to be real dwarfs.  The article left me with the big question of what’s happening to our expectations of theatre?  What’s happened to the imagination?

How soon is too soon?

In Lydia's adaptation class last year, I remember her giving us advice on what to pick to adapt into a play.  If we were to adapt a real life story, she urged us to pick the story of someone who had died.  Writing a play about someone no longer living would reduce the chance of offending people or being sued for libel.  Writing about someone who died a long time ago further reduces that chance because there are fewer living family members and friends who might also be offended.  It makes sense to me.  Even on an artistic level, I assume it would be easier to write about someone who's passed.  I chose to write a play about Pattie Boyd, the greatest Rock and Roll muse of all time.  But she is still living.  I remember stifling my creative impulses when writing it because its characters, Pattie and Eric Clapton are still alive, and George Harrison is survived by many people.  I worried about offending them so much that the play was going nowhere and I ended up switching the project entirely.

This is why I was surprised to read that an emerging playwright, Tim Price is in the process of developing a play about Bradley Manning, the "WikiLeaks whistleblower."  Manning, who went on trial yesterday, is in the middle of the public eye.  His story is current and world changing.  Beyond the worry of offending someone (Price says he wants to paint a positive portrait of Manning, anyway) or the risk of being sued by the subject, there is another challenge.  How does one write a play about something that is happening in that moment?  This story will be changing every day, new information will constantly be coming to the surface.  Price voices this concern in his article, "Could we use some of the leaked material on stage? Was there a public-interest defence for work shown in a theatre? Could we libel real people in Bradley's life? Could the US military sue?"  All too valid.

Regardless, the playwright says he must write about this story.  I don't blame him.  It's compelling and relevant.  But how soon is too soon?

Mind the Gap!

New York Theatre Workshop, which is the theatre I chose for my Antigone project and is still proving to catch my interest as a company, has a playwrighting and theatre-making series called Mind the Gap that was created in 2009.

The way it works: for 10 weeks a group of teenagers converse and share stories with people over 60, whom they've never met before. Starting off as a larger group, by the end of the program pairs will be formed and writings will be developed based on their partners life. And then read by a professional actor!

What an exciting series! Especially with our discussions revolving around the disappearing or confusing role of the playwright in theatre today. I think this is a really innovative way for theatre artists to become inspired by a completely blank slate. No prior judgement about telling a family story or a friends deepest secret. The way they set it up, you're stories are being theatrically created through a complete strangers eyes - who will bring their own conceptions and thoughts to what you bring.

I remember last year in playwrighting and adapatation, I struggled to find the right inspiration that would fuel my process along. There's a sort of healthy distancing in the way the NYTW has set up this workshop series - these plays don't necessarily become therapeutic but purely artistic. In a world where this line can be easily blurred, this is a great opportunity to create something that is maybe non-existent in your own world.

It also brings up an interesting question about the art of telling stories:

“It’s interesting to see what people focus on, why they tell the stories they do,” Mr. Lewin says. “Who really knows what’s been a defining story in someone’s life? It might have been something small.”

I love this! Why do we feel the need to tell the particular stories we tell? Maybe we need an objective, random, complete stranger to figure out that spark in us. And how does a story build when being feed through the original source to a voice nearly 50 years older than you and then to an unknowing actor and then, hopefully, to an audience of hundreds? Its a really wonderful, innovation and simplistic creation by the NYTW.