<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Access to wealth in a complex economy, Part 2: Revitalization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.bu.edu/law/2011/12/05/access-to-wealth-in-a-complex-economy-part-2-revitalization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/law/2011/12/05/access-to-wealth-in-a-complex-economy-part-2-revitalization/</link>
	<description>In their own words: BU Law Student Blogs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 16:44:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yaminette</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/law/2011/12/05/access-to-wealth-in-a-complex-economy-part-2-revitalization/comment-page-1/#comment-3444</link>
		<dc:creator>Yaminette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 22:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bu.edu/law/?p=2221#comment-3444</guid>
		<description>David, this is not only applicable for revitalization efforts but also in other fields, e.g. social work and public health, even though A LOT less money is at stake! You end with a good point of getting &quot;new engines going&quot; while &quot;getting all the miles&quot; out of the current engine/system because it&#039;s otherwise too costly (on various levels) to try to tear down an established system and build something new back up again. (However much we&#039;d like to do that!) 
I also appreciate your critical analysis of revitalization (or for me as a social worker, this lends itself a good comparison to rehabilitation of families) because in a lot of ways we maintain the same system that puts people at a &quot;disadvantage&quot; in the first place. Here&#039;s to thinking up of new innovative ways that we hope will be less exploitative while doing the most we can with what we have!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, this is not only applicable for revitalization efforts but also in other fields, e.g. social work and public health, even though A LOT less money is at stake! You end with a good point of getting &#8220;new engines going&#8221; while &#8220;getting all the miles&#8221; out of the current engine/system because it&#8217;s otherwise too costly (on various levels) to try to tear down an established system and build something new back up again. (However much we&#8217;d like to do that!)<br />
I also appreciate your critical analysis of revitalization (or for me as a social worker, this lends itself a good comparison to rehabilitation of families) because in a lot of ways we maintain the same system that puts people at a &#8220;disadvantage&#8221; in the first place. Here&#8217;s to thinking up of new innovative ways that we hope will be less exploitative while doing the most we can with what we have!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
