<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Light &#38; Shadow &#187; Clayton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.bu.edu/lightandshadow/tag/clayton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/lightandshadow</link>
	<description>BU&#039;s Graduate Film and Culture review blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 03:00:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Finding the Beauty&#8211;Book Review: The Language and Style of Film Criticism Edited by Alex Clayton and Andrew Klevan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.bu.edu/lightandshadow/2011/07/14/508/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.bu.edu/lightandshadow/2011/07/14/508/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 15:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nsf223</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Book Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bordwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cinephilia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clayton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Klevan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicholas Forster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rodowick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Style]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Essay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bu.edu/lightandshadow/?p=508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Theory is dead. Well, so I am told. Since the 1990s critics, authors and writers such as David Bordwell, Murray Pomerance and many others have stressed the need to steer film theory in a new direction, whether it be film-philosophy, neo-formalism or another approach (if not theory altogether). Thankfully, if theory is not completely dead [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.bu.edu/lightandshadow/2011/07/14/508/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
