{"id":937,"date":"2011-03-24T12:52:35","date_gmt":"2011-03-24T16:52:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.bu.edu\/core\/?p=937"},"modified":"2011-03-25T15:34:08","modified_gmt":"2011-03-25T19:34:08","slug":"on-misreading-homer-and-finding-the-divine-in-coffee","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.bu.edu\/core\/2011\/03\/24\/on-misreading-homer-and-finding-the-divine-in-coffee\/","title":{"rendered":"On Misreading Homer and Finding the Divine in Coffee"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Next month&#8217;s issue of the New York Review of Books features Gary Wills&#8217; biting condemnation of the effort of Hubert Dreyfus and Sean Dorrance Kelly to reconcile modern nihilism in their new book <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/product\/1416596151?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=thneyoreofbo-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=1416596151\">All Things Shining: Reading the Western Classics to Find Meaning in a Secular Age<\/a>.\u00a0 The problem is not that the book is unnecessarily abstruse, but rather seems to be tackling a monumental problem with a kind of rigor akin to building a dog house with a sledge hammer:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>So how can one make intelligent choices? Hubert Dreyfus and Sean  Dorrance Kelly call modern nihilism \u201cthe idea that there is no reason to  prefer any answer to any other.\u201d They propose what they think is a wise  and accepting superficiality. By not trying to get to the bottom of  things, one can get glimpses of the sacred from the surface of what they  call \u201cwhoosh\u201d moments\u2014from the presence of charismatic persons to the  shared excitement of a sports event.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>It only gets worse when the authors begin referencing western classics:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Homer, we are told, does not judge this adulterous woman, and the proof  is a line they quote from the Richmond Lattimore translation of <em>Iliad<\/em> 4.305, which says she is \u201cshining among women.\u201d This proves that \u201cHomer  deeply admires Helen.\u201d The authors do not understand the formulaic  nature of oral poetry. The line-ending metrical formula <em>dia gynaik\u014dn<\/em> is used for outstanding women, as the similar phrase <em>dia the\u0101\u014dn<\/em>,  \u201cshining among goddesses,\u201d is used for outstanding deities. The formula  is just another way of saying \u201cHelen,\u201d as \u201cfast on his feet\u201d is a way  of saying \u201cAchilles.\u201d It expresses no personal judgment by Homer  (whoever or whatever he is). Since the same formula is used for  Penelope, the virtuous wife of Odysseus, the authors claim that Homer  made no moral distinction between the two. They even say that Helen is a  goddess, since <em>dia gynaik\u014dn<\/em> can mean that. It does not, without the addition of<em> the\u0101\u014dn<\/em> (to describe, for instance, Hera).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The review concludes referencing the authors&#8217; fascination, it seems, with finding &#8220;whoosh&#8221; in making coffee:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>They take us through five pages on the sacred craft of the wheelwright  and then through four pages of the \u201crevered domain\u201d of making the proper  cup of coffee\u2014the sacred beans, the sacred cup lovingly tended, the  company worthy to share this holy communion&#8230; Thank God we have been delivered from the meaningless inwardness of  Augustine and Dante, to worship at the shining caffeine altar.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>You can read the full review <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nybooks.com\/articles\/archives\/2011\/apr\/07\/superficial-sublime\/?page=1\">here<\/a>.\u00a0 Is modern, secular life only worthwhile in light of seemingly random, disconnected moments of whoosh that go largely <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.bu.edu\/core\/2011\/02\/01\/the-examined-life-is-rarely-worth-living\/\">unexamined<\/a>?\u00a0 Feel free to leave your thoughts below.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Next month&#8217;s issue of the New York Review of Books features Gary Wills&#8217; biting condemnation of the effort of Hubert Dreyfus and Sean Dorrance Kelly to reconcile modern nihilism in their new book All Things Shining: Reading the Western Classics to Find Meaning in a Secular Age.\u00a0 The problem is not that the book is [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1284,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[3715],"tags":[3043,5412],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bu.edu\/core\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/937"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bu.edu\/core\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bu.edu\/core\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bu.edu\/core\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1284"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bu.edu\/core\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=937"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bu.edu\/core\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/937\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":963,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bu.edu\/core\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/937\/revisions\/963"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bu.edu\/core\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=937"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bu.edu\/core\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=937"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bu.edu\/core\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=937"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}