When asked about his involvement with super-sexy-super-witty-super-model-super-singer Carla Bruni, President Sarkozy responded: \u201cIt\u2019s serious\u201d, according to a CNN sound byte during NH primary coverage.<\/p>\n
However, a little YouTube digging revealed his ACTUAL answer: a five-minute response that ranged widely through the historical precedents for asking a president such a question, the difficulties of human relationships in general, and the ludicrousness of the media caring so much about the personal life of a man who is fundamentally like any other\u2026 which goes hand-in-hand with the contemporary media misconception that being covert about one\u2019s private life somehow corresponds to corrupt and nontransparent leadership (COUGH Bill Clinton).<\/p>\n
I wish the current U.S. Presidential candidates could give this kind of response to media badgering. It was bitingly sarcastic, well-informed, and evinced a level of sophisticated contemplation beyond mere pre-press-conference maneuvering (\u201cBeing the President of the Republic doesn\u2019t guarantee one the right to happiness\u2013no more happiness than anyone else has. But no less, either\u201d), and it certainly wasn\u2019t cut into slogans meant for endless replay in news commercials. He reminisced about the days when \u201cA chacun sa vie\u201d (\u201cto each his own\u201d) was the reigning philosophy when it came to personal presidential matters, and it made me miss those days, too.<\/p>\n
Ironically, carrying on about this for so long\u2013even though he was criticizing the nature of the question\u2013actually lowered his approval ratings, since citizens complained he was spending too much time talking about his relationship and not about real politics\u2026 imagine THAT public response in OUR country\u2026<\/p>\n
Sarkozy\u2019s tone and perspective remind me of Hillary\u2019s sarcastic response to the fact that people don\u2019t find her \u201clikable\u201d: \u201cThat hurts my feelings! \u2026but\u2026 I guess I\u2019ll just have to carry on, somehow\u2026\u201d And, to reference the over-played Hillary-tears-up tape, her message that behind the rehearsed responses to debate questions, beyond the stark polling numbers, she is deeply and personally invested in making our country a better place and in pointing it away from what she sees as a darkening future is\u2026 refreshing (and sounds a little like that guy who just won the peace prize). As much as I don\u2019t like Sarkozy, and though I am reluctant to vote for Hilary, that kind of meta-level perspective is what we\u2019ve been sorely missing in the presidency lately; without it America has gotten into serious trouble.<\/p>\n
These little glimpses of politicos\u2019 evolution States-side and abroad give me at least a little hope. But if I have to go through a whole election year watching CNN cut rich, challenging rhetoric down to \u201cIt\u2019s serious,\u201d and furthermore have to watch candidates cater to that simple-minded standard, I\u2019ll have trouble believing my vote is in any way \u2018informed,\u2019 or that our election process is anything more than a tabloid-triggered shot in the dark.<\/p>\n
[This cutting diagnosis of media\u2019s preference for sound bites over reasoned responses \u2014 and for sexual gossip rather than political intelligence \u2014\u00a0comes from Julie Johnson, editor of Clarion<\/a> at Boston University. When she told me how CNN had chopped President Sarkozy\u2019s responses, I shook my head first not at the infantilitzation of our public discourse, but rather at the sad fact that media outlets find it profitable to fix their cameras on the face and body of politicians\u2019 partners like Carla Bruni or Camilla Parker Bowles. How offensive that mascara should play any role in a campaign plan; that it can and does speaks to the pervasive view of female companions as possessions owned by men in power. Are the male companions of female candidates subjected to this scrutiny? I don\u2019t believe they are, since that deep-rooted tradition of political dimorphism lodged in our media psyche favors men, demeans women, and altogether ignores those outside the heteronormative groove. \u2013CivilizeMe ]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" When asked about his involvement with super-sexy-super-witty-super-model-super-singer Carla Bruni, President Sarkozy responded: \u201cIt\u2019s serious\u201d, according to a CNN sound byte during NH primary coverage. However, a little YouTube digging revealed his ACTUAL answer: a five-minute response that ranged widely through the historical precedents for asking a president such a question, the difficulties of human relationships … Continue reading Oh it\u2019s sooo serious.<\/span>