National Geographic investigates claims of paranormal abilities. Is the Sufi ability to withstand piercings in the body due to some supernatural force? Can martial arts practitioners use chi to knock over an opponent?
Warning: The video includes some graphic sequences of people piercing their bodies.
The standard criterion for considering a scientific study to be statistically significant is having a p-value less than 5%.
This means that (according to the relevant background theory) there's less than a one in twenty chance that the result in question would have been found merely as a result of chance.
George Marshall discusses some practical advice -- based on research in psychology and sociology -- about how to talk to people if you want to change their minds (as opposed to simply engaging them in arguments).
For one, he says I should call denialists "dissenters" instead of denialists.
It seems like good advice. But it's also worth noting that it's decidedly unphilosophical in some important respects.
Philosophy is all about giving reasons for holding or rejecting a belief. It's about arguments. It's a process that assumes you are interested in rationally engaging with the world.
Marshall is right that many of us don't come to our beliefs through a (purely) rational process. But shouldn't it be an ideal we strive towards?
An important part of what makes a bird a bird is the size of its brain. In this respect, Archaeopteryx isn't as closely related to modern birds as you might have thought.
It's always good to choose your words carefully, but this is especially true when terms used in science have slightly different meanings when used in everyday contexts.