Book Talk for LUISS Guido Carli University in Rome

On Friday, June 4, I had the honor of presenting my book for LUISS Guido Carli University in Rome, where I am also an Honorary Professor. Joining the discussion were Giuliano Amato, Vice President of the Italian Constitutional Court (and former Prime Minister); Sergio Fabbrini, Dean of the Department of Political Science, Luiss University; Stefano Micossi, President of the School of European Political Economy, Luiss University; Giovanni Orsina, Director of the School of Government, Luiss University; and Mark Thatcher, Professor of The Politics of Cultural Heritage in Europe, Luiss University.

New Books on Europe Book Talk for University of Nantes

On May 27, I took part in a webinar dedicated to the the discussion of the new books on Europe organized by Arnauld LECLERC, the Télos, Ethos, Nomos de l’Europe (TEN Europa) Jean Monnet Chair at the University of Nantes (DCS). The topic of discussion was my new book, Europe’s Crisis of Legitimacy : Governing by Rules and Ruling by Numbers in the Eurozone. Muriel ROUYER, Professor of political science at the University of Nantes (DCS) and Morgane DELORME, PhD student in political science at the University of Nantes (DCS) and in philosophy at the University of Montreal (CRE) joined the discussion.

Emergency Politics Beyond the State: Europe’s Exceptional Transformation

eu_politics_series_logo_0On May 25, I participated in a webinar on the politics of emergency, as part of a series of online talks from UCL’s European Institute and the Department of Public Policy/School of Public Policy. 

The roundtable discussion builds on a debate section on “European and the Transnational Politics of Emergency,” co-eds Christian Kreuder-Sonnen and Jonathan White (2021) , in the Journal of European Public Policy, to which I contributed. My article for the journal is entitled:  “European Emergency Politics and the Question of Legitimacy.”

Constitutionalism in the Age of Populism Book Talk

On Monday, May 24, I took part in a discussion hosted by BU’s Center for the Study of Europe with Bojan Bugaric, Professor of Law at Sheffield University and Associate Fellow, SPERI (Sheffield Political Economy Research Institute, and Mark Tushnet, William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Law, Emeritus, at Harvard Law School. Bugaric and Tushnet were presenting their forthcoming book from Oxford University Press: Power to the People: Constitutionalism in an Age of Populism. I was joined by Robert L. Tsai, Professor of Law at Boston University, who also offered comments.

Bugaric and Tushnet’s book challenges the notion that populism is ipso facto incompatible with modern liberal democracy. While acknowledging that some variants of populism are indeed incompatible with constitutionalism, they argue that the tension between populism and constitutionalism is narrower than much of the commentary suggests. Their analysis of populism in a variety of contexts reveals there are many populisms, and further, that sometimes populism helps to revivify democracy rather than undermine it.

Presentation on COVID-19 and Implications for Oslo University PhD Students


On May 21, I gave a presentation entitled “COVID 19 and Its Possible Implications for EU Differentiation” for  PhD students in a short course  on A Differentiated Europe and Its Implications” organized by ARENA Center for European Studies, Oslo University. The core objective of this course is to address differentiation as a central concern in European studies, across academic disciplines from political science, public policy and public administration, to law, sociology and history.

How to Overcome the EU’s Legitimacy Crisis?


On May 10, 2021, I took part in a webinar organized by the RECONNECT Horizon 2020 projecta four-year multidisciplinary research project on ‘Reconciling Europe with its Citizens through Democracy and the Rule of Law’, aimed at understanding and providing solutions to the recent challenges faced by the European Union (EU). 

The event begins with a presentation by RECONNECT partner Prof. Bernd Schlipphak (University of Münster), who summarizes the results from a survey among 12,000 citizens from six European countries on the ideal setting of the EU in the mind of European citizens. Based on these results, a panel of experts consisting of myself, Prof. Brigid Laffan (EUI, Florence), Prof. Michael Zürn (WZB, Berlin) discusses the implications for the wider prospects of EU reform. The webinar is moderated by RECONNECT partner Prof. Oliver Treib in collaboration with Dana S. Atzpodien (both from the University of Münster).


Keynote Speech for Trade Union Movement in Germany

On Monday, April 19, I gave a keynote speech for a series of online events organized by the trade union movement in Germany together with the Friedrich Ebert Foundation and the Hans Böckler Foundation under the title: “Towards the United States of Europe? Trade union visions for a progressive European economic policy.” In addition to my keynote speech, I was asked to participate in the third panel, focused on  “How united should the United States of Europe be? Opportunities and limitations of flexible integration in EU economic policy.”

Other keynotes were given by Martin Schulz, former President of the European Parliament, and Frank Werneke, head of the industrial services Union. The other participants in the panel discussion, which was chaired by Melinda Crane, were Reiner Hoffmann (German Trade Union Confederation),  Philippa Sigl-Glöckner (member in the economic advisory board of the German Social Democratic Party) and Lukas Oberndorfer (Chamber of Labour Vienna).

Key questions discussed during the panel were:

1)      What exactly can a flexible EU economic policy look like? How much flexibility is possible in the Monetary Union?
2)       Does the current EU economic governance have a legitimacy problem?  How can the legitimacy of the EU economic governance be strengthened?
3)      Are further integration steps needed in EU economic policy? What kind of reforms are needed? Can further integration steps in  EU economic policy be harmful?

I also produced a short article for the event with my main points, which will be translated and published on the blog of the Friedrich-Ebert-Foundation, the IPG journal: Journal für Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft | IPG Journal.

An Economy that Works for the People: Beyond Brexit and Covid-19

On Monday, April 12, I was a speaker on a panel entitled “The New EU Economic Policy after Covid-19 and Next Generation EU” as part of the day-long high level conference An Economy that Works for the People: Beyond Brexit and Covid-19.” Organized by the the DCU Brexit Institute in Dublin in the framework of the Jean Monnet Project RELAY, an EU-funded Erasmus+ project, coordinated by the University of Maastricht and involving a number of partners across Europe, the aim of the conference was to to assess the policy priorities of the new European Commission. The event, which featured a keynote speech by Mr. Paolo Gentiloni, European Commissioner in charge of Economic Affairs, took stock of the major developments which Next Generation EU, the post-pandemic recovery fund, represents for the future of the European Union.

[Download the conference program]

An event report may be found here. The recordings of the event will be available on the DCU Brexit Institute youtube channel.

Discursive Institutionalism Presentation for Norwegian University Consortium


On March 8, 2021, I gave a presentation entitled “Discursive Institutionalism:  Analyzing the Power of Ideas and Discourse in Institutional Context” for a research seminar series on Law, Democracy and Welfare (RDV) hosted by a university consortium in the West of Norway.

The seminar series is based on a collaboration between the Research Group Law, Democracy and Welfare at the Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, the Center for Research on Discretion and Paternalism at the Department of Administration and Organization Theory at the University of Bergen, and the Center for Law and Social Transformation at the University of Bergen. The seminar series’ field of interest is located at the interplay between law, welfare, and democracy, with a focus both on the effects different legal constructions have on the liberty and social and political participation of vulnerable groups and on of welfare services practice and decision-making.