Graduates from Boston University were ranked 17th most employable in the world and 7th most employable in the US by the 2012 Global Employability Survey, published by the New York Times and International Herald Tribune. It was discussed in BU Today on November 1, 2012. Here is the results in table form from the NY Times.
This represents a huge improvement from their ranking 51st in the US by the same newspaper in 2011. Is this big change believable, and why the big change? The biggest factor is that for the 2011 study, (http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2011/10/20/education/20iht-SReducEmploy20-graphic.html?ref=education) the NYT Survey polled only business executives and board chairs, and only surveyed them from the ten countries, while for the 2012 the international survey included 20 countries from all over the world, including Asia and Latin America. The new survey also explicitly included 1200 top business recruiters as well as 1500 chief executives and business managers, as in the past.
It makes a big difference whether you ask recruiters as well as than chief executives, since recruiters will care more about a very large number of potential candidates before they visit or give attention to candidates from a particular university. Plus this new survey included Australian and Asian countries for the first time.
Boston University is not only one of the largest (28,000+) private universities but has also had a large number of international, and particularly, Asian students and alumni, for decades. It also has a rich set of graduate degrees with high proportions international.
The following table was generated from the US News and World reports using the 50 universities with the highest % international undergraduate students. It shows that Boston University had the ninth highest number of international students among all these universities. Moreover some of the other surprises also have much higher numbers than the ivies and other top schools. Hence these ratings from recruiters make sense, once one takes this into account.
Ranking of 50 Universities with high international student percentages by number of international students.
Source: http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/most-international/spp+50
Columns
A = ranking by largest number of international undergraduate students
B = University name
C = % internat.
D = # of Undergrads
E = Number of Internat. students
F = rank by # % Internat
Source: http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/most-international/spp+50 | |||||
A | B | C | D | E | F |
% internat. | Undergrads | Internat. students | Rank by % Internat | ||
1 | Purdue University–West Lafayette | 15% | 30,776 | 4616.4 | 8 |
2 | University of Illinois–Urbana-Champaign | 13% | 32,256 | 4193.28 | 12 |
3 | Michigan State University | 9% | 36,675 | 3300.75 | 36 |
4 | University at Buffalo–SUNY | 16% | 19,334 | 3093.44 | 7 |
5 | Indiana University–Bloomington | 9% | 32,543 | 2928.87 | 39 |
6 | University of Minnesota–Twin Cities | 8% | 34,812 | 2784.96 | 50 |
7 | University of California–Berkeley | 9% | 25,885 | 2329.65 | 35 |
8 | New York University | 10% | 22,280 | 2228 | 29 |
9 | Boston University | 12% | 18,140 | 2176.8 | 16 |
10 | University of Southern California | 12% | 17,414 | 2089.68 | 15 |
11 | University of California–San Diego | 9% | 23,046 | 2074.14 | 33 |
12 | New School | 27% | 7,081 | 1911.87 | 1 |
13 | Northeastern University | 14% | 12,913 | 1807.82 | 9 |
14 | University of Iowa | 8% | 21,564 | 1725.12 | 48 |
15 | University of Oregon | 8% | 20,623 | 1649.84 | 43 |
16 | Cornell University | 9% | 14,167 | 1275.03 | 38 |
17 | Stony Brook University–SUNY | 8% | 15,926 | 1274.08 | 44 |
18 | Drexel University | 10% | 11,899 | 1189.9 | 31 |
19 | Binghamton University–SUNY | 10% | 11,861 | 1186.1 | 28 |
20 | Syracuse University | 8% | 14,671 | 1173.68 | 46 |
21 | University of Miami | 11% | 10,509 | 1155.99 | 21 |
22 | University of Pennsylvania | 11% | 9,779 | 1075.69 | 20 |
23 | Carnegie Mellon University | 17% | 6,281 | 1067.77 | 6 |
24 | University of Colorado–Denver | 8% | 12,674 | 1013.92 | 45 |
25 | Emory University | 11% | 7,441 | 818.51 | 22 |
26 | University of San Francisco | 13% | 6,051 | 786.63 | 10 |
27 | Harvard University | 11% | 6,657 | 732.27 | 23 |
28 | Florida Institute of Technology | 26% | 2,724 | 708.24 | 2 |
29 | Brown University | 11% | 6,380 | 701.8 | 25 |
30 | St. Louis University | 8% | 8,670 | 693.6 | 42 |
31 | Columbia University | 11% | 6,027 | 662.97 | 19 |
32 | University of Rochester | 11% | 5,643 | 620.73 | 18 |
33 | Georgetown University | 8% | 7,590 | 607.2 | 47 |
34 | Princeton University | 11% | 5,249 | 577.39 | 26 |
35 | Illinois Institute of Technology | 21% | 2,714 | 569.94 | 3 |
36 | University of Tulsa | 18% | 3,004 | 540.72 | 5 |
37 | Johns Hopkins University | 9% | 5,980 | 538.2 | 37 |
38 | Yale University | 10% | 5,349 | 534.9 | 27 |
39 | Duke University | 8% | 6,680 | 534.4 | 49 |
40 | University of Chicago | 9% | 5,388 | 484.92 | 34 |
41 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | 10% | 4,384 | 438.4 | 30 |
42 | University of Denver | 8% | 5,453 | 436.24 | 41 |
43 | Worcester Polytechnic Institute | 11% | 3,849 | 423.39 | 17 |
44 | Brandeis University | 12% | 3,504 | 420.48 | 14 |
45 | Rice University | 10% | 3,755 | 375.5 | 32 |
46 | Lynn University | 18% | 1,619 | 291.42 | 4 |
47 | Andrews University | 13% | 1,929 | 250.77 | 11 |
48 | Polytechnic Institute of New York University | 11% | 1,939 | 213.29 | 24 |
49 | Clark University | 9% | 2,311 | 207.99 | 40 |
50 | California Institute of Technology | 12% | 978 | 117.36 | 13 |
The big jump in the ranking of Boston University’s rating by international recruiters into the “seventh most employable students” from last years ranking of 51 by mostly US business executives is probably mostly real.
BusinessMEN? How about some gender-neutral language, like business people? I’m sure they didn’t just ask men.
Fair enough.
The New York Times describes in its 2011 tables (that are linked) as having contacted “chief executives and chairmen” and it is summarized in the source I saw as “businessmen” but I have edited my blog to be more gender neutral.