And then along comes a case like this one.
I don’t know what else to say, other than it is about a tort.
-
Categories
-
Archives
- July 2018
- June 2016
- July 2014
- June 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
8 Comments
Nick Li posted on February 17, 2012 at 12:19 am
#10, #18, #19, and #22.
I can’t imagine the person writing this complaint keeping a straight face.
Nick Li posted on February 17, 2012 at 12:20 am
Whoops. Forgot #8 too!
Hope Blalock posted on February 19, 2012 at 9:11 pm
If Travis Hughes keeps up with stunts like this one, natural selection is going to take care of him pretty quickly…
Andrew Walters posted on February 20, 2012 at 1:33 am
I can’t believe they didn’t have a railing! They had to know something like this was going to happen…
But in all seriousness, I don’t think missing baseball is this guy’s biggest problem…
Shawn Teng posted on February 20, 2012 at 7:41 pm
wow, I am literally speechless… getting intoxicated and falling off a porch is heard of and possible, but trying to light a bottle rocket in one’s anus? I must say, that’s pretty creative and unheard of. T.S. Elliot once said that “Only those who will risk going too far can possibly find out how far one can go”… and this guy definitely went too far!
Phoebe Chao posted on February 26, 2012 at 10:09 pm
I agree with the first comment!
This sounds absolutely ridiculous. “Ultra-hazardous” activity indeed..
Julia Poon posted on February 28, 2012 at 1:02 am
I’ve never heard of shooting bottle rockets like this, but now I’m strangely curious. This is too funny.
Ting Ting Yang posted on March 5, 2012 at 4:29 pm
This is hilarious. I wonder if Defendant Hughes can sue his own fraternity for negligence as he was underage and technically they should have had duty of care, though the risk is definitely not foreseeable.