Category Archives: Uncategorized

The US Should Ban or Heavily Tax Weapons Designed for Mass Shootings

Boston University Working Paper

Randall P. Ellis
Boston University,
Department of Economics
August 22, 2016
Abstract

This paper presents four arguments for why the US should ban or at least heavily tax the sale or transfer to civilians of weapons designed for mass shootings (WDMS), which would include most semi-automatic guns and weapons with large capacity magazines.

  1. The Supreme Court has repeatedly validated that second amendment protections of the right to bear arms do not apply to particularly dangerous weapons where protection of public safety overrides constitutional protections; this exclusion should apply to WDMS just as it does to machine guns and short-barreled shotguns.
  1. To make gun owners pay for the annual cost of deaths in the US due to guns, we should be taxing each gun owned at $1000 per year, or tax all gun sales (new or used) at $15,000 per gun sold. Given their higher killing power we should tax WDMS at $60,000 per gun sold. Or just ban them.
  1. In the last 36 months, there have been 5,399 people in the US killed or injured at mass shootings (where four or more people are shot, although not necessarily killed). Unless action is taken, the most recent trends suggest that there will be twice as many mass shootings in the US in five years.
  1. Current federal law for duck hunting bans the use of shotguns that hold more than three shells. If we care enough to ban four-bullet capacity guns to preserve ducks, then we should be willing to ban even higher capacity guns designed to kill people.

The full paper is linked here.

http://blogs.bu.edu/ellisrp/files/2016/08/Banning-or-heavily-taxing-WDMS-20160822.pdf

Top 100 Economics Blogs of 2016

I just got an email from Prateek Agarwal <prateek@intelligenteconomist.com>

He has compiled a list of the Top 100 Economics Blogs of 2016. I am of course not on it since I blog infrequently and do not archive (and make public) on my web site all of my blogs, but I thought I would share the link he provided.

https://www.intelligenteconomist.com/top-economics-blogs-2016/

Lots of interesting links, including The Incidental Economist, which is the only one I subscribe to. Be warned that reading blogs can be a major time waster..

I plan to archive this one on my web site blog.

Hope to see many of you at ASHEcon. (Not too late to sign up for the dinner)

Best.

What do BU undergraduates do when they graduate?

I am often asked by undergrads and MA students what BU students do when they graduate. For the first time that I know of, BU has published a relatively complete description and list of the places where they get jobs, or go to graduate school or  volunteer.  It is discussed in the new CAS Dean Ann Cudd's newsletter which is linked here.

A Note from Dean Cudd: Preparing our Undergraduates for the ‘Real World’

Of particular interest is the pdf file listing where undergrads are working and what their job title is.

CLASS OF 2014: Post-Graduation First Destination Profile

From now on, this list will be one of the first places I suggest undergrad job seekers look for possibilities in the US, abroad, and to consider BU alumni to network with.

In addition to being their placement officer, I help maintain the list of recent BU placements of our Ph.D. students which is linked here.

Recent Ph.D. job placements.

By the way, it is also not too late for alumni from our Ph.D. program to interview and hire our candidates on the job market. (Another impressive group.) They are linked here.

Current Ph.D. job candidates.

Separately, in the last two days, I met with one undergraduate and two MA students during office hours, all who happened to be from China.  All three said that the BU program was much harder than the courses their friends were taking elsewhere as undergraduates or Master's students. While they were in part complaining about too much work at BU, all of them were also grateful that they are getting a solid education and being challenged. It makes it a good investment. I told them to tell their friends in China and elsewhere. It also made me feel proud that BU has not succumbed to  the rampant grade inflation and work deflation that is common elsewhere.

Randy

 

iHEA Milan attracts twenty BU current and former students, faculty and visitors

Among the 1400 worldwide attendees, BU was again well represented at the International Health Economics Association biennial meetings in Milan Italy, 2015 with 20 current and former students, faculty and visitors present. Present were:

Osea Giuntella, Giulia La Mattina, Francesco Decarolis, Ana Balsa, Daniel Maceira, Julie Shi,  Michal Horny, Randy Ellis, Arturo Schweiger, Wenjia Zhu, Matilde Machado, Hsienming Lien, Jitian Sheu, Sara R Machado, Kathleen Carey, Alan B Cohen, Adam H Shapiro, Monica Galizzi, and  Mead Over.

Hope to see all of you in Boston iHEA 2017.

 

Deflategate pressure drop is consistent with a ball air temperature of 72 degrees when tested initially.

Deflategate pressure drop is consistent with a ball air temperature of 72 degrees when tested initially.

I revised my original Deflategate posting after learning that it is absolute air pressure not pressure above standard sea level pressure that follows the Ideal Gas Law.  I also allowed for stretching of the leather once the ball becomes wet. And for the possibility that the cold rain was was colder (45 degrees F) below the recorded air temperature at 53 degrees F.  Together these adjustments make it even easier for the weather to fully explain the drop in ball pressure.

My Bottom Line: The NFL owes the Patriot Nation and Bob Kraft a big apology.

Correction #1: My initial use of the ideal gas formula did not recognize that it is absolute pressure, not pressure above the ambient air pressure that matters. Hence a ball with a pressure of 12.5 PSI is actually 12.5 PSI above the surrounding air pressure, which is about 14 PSI at sea level. So a decline from 12.5 PSI to 10.5 PSI is actually only an 8.2 percent decline in absolute pressure from 26.5 to 24.5 PSI. This makes it much easier for temperature changes to explain the difference in ball pressure. Only an 8.2 percent change in absolute temperature (approximately a 42 degree Fahrenheit drop) would be required it that were the only change needed.

Correction #2: It is well established that water allows leather to stretch. I found one site that noted that water can allow leather to stretch by 2-5% when wet.  It does not specify how much force is needed to achieve this.

https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=A0LEVvwgfs9UP0AAr40nnIlQ?qid=20060908234923AAxt7xP

It is plausible that a new ball made of leather under pressure (scuffed up to let in the moisture quickly)  might stretch 1 percent upon getting wet (such as in the rain). Since volume goes up with the cube of this stretching, this would be a (1.01)^3 -1= 3 percent increase in ball volume or decline in pressure. This amount would reduces the absolute temperature difference needed for the 2 PSI drop to only 5.2 percent (a change of only 27 degrees F.)

Correction #3: It was raining on game day, and the rain was probably much colder than the outside air temperature. So it is plausible that the game ball was as cold as 45 degrees Fahrenheit at game time when the low ball pressures were detected. This makes even lower initial testing temperatures consistent with the professed levels of underinflation.

A single formula can be used to calculate the ball temperature needed when tested initially to explain a ball pressure detected during the game that is 2 PSI lower, after getting colder (to 45 degrees F), .004 smaller (since ball volume shrinks when cold), and stretched 1% due to rain. It would be

Pregame testing temperature in F =(pressure change as a ratio)/(volume change due to cold)/(volume change due to leather stretching 1% when wet)*(45 degree ball temperature during game+460 degrees) - 460 degrees

(12.5+14)/(10.5+14)/(.996)/(1.01^3)(45+460) - 460 = 72 degrees Fahrenheit

Given this math, it would have been surprising if the ball pressure had NOT declined significantly.

Final comment #1: All of these calculations and hypotheses can be tested empirically. See the empirical analysis done by Headsmart Labs (http://www.headsmartlabs.com). They find that a rain plus a 25 degree drop is consistent with a 1.82 PSI decrease.

Final comment #2: Since the original game balls were reinflated by officials during halftime, the true ball pressures during the first half will never be known. Moreover there seems to be no documentary record of their pressures at the time they were re-inflated.

The XLIX Superbowl was a terrific game from the point of view of Patriots fans. Now it is time for the NFL  to own up to its own mistake in accusing the Patriots of cheating.  It was just a matter of physics.

Revised calculations

 

Various combinations of testing temperatures and PSI
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O
Adjustments for temperature only, correcting for absolute pressure at 14 PSI at sea level Adjustments for changes in ball volume Adjusting for temperature and football volume
Temperature F Degrees above Absolute zero Temperature adjustment Various game time or testing PSI readings surface area sphere radius mean football radius volume Volume adjustment Various game time or testing PSI readings
Game time temperature 45 505 1.000 10.5 11 11.5 189 3.8782 3.81183 232 1.000 10.5 11 11.5
60 520 1.030 11.2 11.7 12.3 189.2427 3.8807 3.81427 232.447 0.998 11.3 11.8 12.3
70 530 1.050 11.7 12.2 12.8 189.4045 3.8824 3.81590 232.7451 0.997 11.8 12.3 12.8
Possibl e testing temperatures 80 540 1.069 12.2 12.7 13.3 189.5663 3.8840 3.81753 233.0434 0.996 12.3 12.9 13.4
90 550 1.089 12.7 13.2 13.8 189.7280 3.8857 3.81916 233.3418 0.994 12.8 13.4 13.9
100 560 1.109 13.2 13.7 14.3 189.8898 3.8873 3.82079 233.6403 0.993 13.4 13.9 14.5
110 570 1.129 13.7 14.2 14.8 190.0516 3.8890 3.82242 233.939 0.992 13.9 14.5 15.0
120 580 1.149 14.1 14.7 15.3 190.2134 3.8906 3.82404 234.2378 0.990 14.4 15.0 15.6
130 590 1.168 14.6 15.2 15.8 190.3752 3.8923 3.82567 234.5367 0.989 14.9 15.5 16.1
140 600 1.188 15.1 15.7 16.3 190.5370 3.8940 3.82730 234.8357 0.988 15.5 16.1 16.7
150 610 1.208 15.6 16.2 16.8 190.6988 3.8956 3.82892 235.1349 0.987 16.0 16.6 17.2
160 620 1.228 16.1 16.7 17.3 190.8606 3.8973 3.83054 235.4342 0.985 16.5 17.1 17.8
Temperature (Fo) at which ball would pass test. 2 PSI diff 1.5 PSI diff 1 PSI diff 88 77 67
Temperature only 86 75 65
Temperature and volume change from temp 88 77 67
temp, volume, and stretching from wetness 72 62 51
Last row calculated as (12.5+14)/(inferred test level+14)/(0.996)/(1.01^3)*(45+460)-460
Notes
Revised calculations allow for sea level temperature to be 14 PSI, so a change from 10.5 to 12.5 PSI (above this level requires only a (12.5+14)/(10.5+14)-1=8.2 percent change in absolute temperature.
See notes at the top, but final calculations also allow for the possiblities that ball temperature was 45 degrees, not 53 due to cold rain, and 1% stretching in leather due to rain.
Fields in first row and first column are input parameters, others are calculated

 

Original post

There is no mention of the temperature at which the footballs need to be stored or tested in the official NFL rule book. (Sloppy rules!)

The process of scuffing up the new balls to make them feel better no doubt warms them up. It would be impossible for it to be otherwise. An empirical question is how much did it warm them up and what temperature were they when tested?

Surface temps could have been below their internal temperature of the air, which is what matters for the pressure. Leather is a pretty good insulator (hence its use in many coats).

Anyone who took high school physics may remember that pressure and temperature satisfy

PV=nRT

Pressure*Volume=Number of moles*ideal gas constant*Temperature  (Ideal Gas Law)

Temperature needs to be measured in degrees above absolute zero, which is -459.67 Fahrenheit (sorry metric readers!). The temperature at game time was 53 degrees. So the right question to ask is:At what temperature,  T1, would the air in the ball have to be at the time the balls were tested such that once they cooled down to T0=53 degrees they measures two pounds per square inch (PSI) below the allowed minimum?

The lowest allowed temperature for testing was 12.5 PSI. We are told only vaguely that the balls were 2 PSI lower than this, but this is not a precise number. It could be it was rounded from 1.501 PSI. that would mean they  might have been 11 pounds PSI when tested during the game.  I examine 10.5, 11 and 11.5 as possible game time test PSI levels.The following tables shows possible combinations of game time testing temperature and half-time testing temperatures that would be consistent with various pressures.The right hand side of the table makes an adjustment for the fact that the leather/rubber in the ball would also have shrunk as the ball cooled down, which works against the temperature.Using the formulaPSI1=PSI0*((T1+459.67)/(T0+459.67). (See correction above!) Ignoring the volume change of the ball, it is straightforward to solve for what initial temperature the balls would have had to be for the observed game time temperatures.

Adjusting for a plausible guess at the small amount that the leather plus rubber bladder would have also changed makes only a small difference.

For a 1.5 PSI difference from testing to halftime , the air inside of them would have had to be at about 128 degrees at the time they were tested. (The leather skin could have been a lower temperature.) This would have made them feel warm but not burning hot to the hand.

Allowing the balls to be warm when tested is sneaky or perhaps accidental, but not cheating.

Go Pats!

Various combinations of testing temperatures and PSI
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O
Adjustments for temperature only Adjustments for changes in ball volume Adjusting for temperature and football volume
Temperature F Degrees above Absolute zero Temperature adjustment Various game time or testing PSI readings surface area sphere radius mean football radius volume Volume adjustment Various game time or testing PSI readings
Game time temperature 53 512.67 1.000 10.5 11 11.5 189 3.8782 3.81183 232 1.000 10.5 11 11.5
Possibl e testing temperatures 80 539.67 1.053 11.1 11.6 12.1 189.4368 3.8827 3.81623 232.8048 1.003 11.0 11.5 12.1
90 549.67 1.072 11.3 11.8 12.3 189.5986 3.8844 3.81786 233.1031 1.005 11.2 11.7 12.3
100 559.67 1.092 11.5 12.0 12.6 189.7604 3.8860 3.81949 233.4015 1.006 11.4 11.9 12.5
110 569.67 1.111 11.7 12.2 12.8 189.9222 3.8877 3.82112 233.7001 1.007 11.6 12.1 12.7
120 579.67 1.131 11.9 12.4 13.0 190.0840 3.8893 3.82274 233.9988 1.009 11.8 12.3 12.9
130 589.67 1.150 12.1 12.7 13.2 190.2458 3.8910 3.82437 234.2976 1.010 12.0 12.5 13.1
140 599.67 1.170 12.3 12.9 13.5 190.4076 3.8926 3.82600 234.5965 1.011 12.1 12.7 13.3
150 609.67 1.189 12.5 13.1 13.7 190.5693 3.8943 3.82762 234.8956 1.012 12.3 12.9 13.5
160 619.67 1.209 12.7 13.3 13.9 190.7311 3.8959 3.82924 235.1948 1.014 12.5 13.1 13.7
Temperature (Fo) at which ball would pass test. 151 123 98 159 128 101
Notes
Fields in yellow are input parameters, others are calculated
Column C is temperature minus absolute zero
Column D is the ratio of column C to the game time temp in absolute degrees and shows how much higher PSI would have been than at game time.
Columns E through G show possible testing PSI for three possible game time PSI levels.
Columns H through L show adjustments to volume which tend to reduce the PSI as a ball is heated. Calculations use rate of expansion of hard rubber per square inch per degree.
Columns M through O show Balll PSI after adjusting for both air temperature and football volume
Parameters and formulas
absolute zero= -459.67 fahrenheit
hard rubber expansion 42.8 (10-6 in/(in oF))*) http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/linear-expansion-coefficients-d_95.html
or 0.0000428 Used for column I expansion of surface area
Surface area assume to grow with the square of this proportion with temperature.
The approximate volume and surface area of a standard football are 232 cubic inches and 189 square inches, respectively.
http://www.answers.com/Q/Volume_and_surface_area_of_a_football
Surface of a sphere formula
4pr2 Used to calculate radius of sphere
volume of sphere formula
4/3*pi*radius3 Used to calculate volume of football. Volume adjusted downward by a fixed proportion because footballs are not spheres.

 

NFL rules

Rule 2 The BallSection 1BALL DIMENSIONSThe Ball must be a “Wilson,” hand selected, bearingthe signature of the Commissioner of the League, Roger Goodell.The ball shall be made up of an inflated (12 1/2 to 13 1/2 pounds) urethane bladder enclosed in a pebble grained, leather case(natural tan color) without corrugations of any kind. It shall have the form of a prolate spheroid and the size and weightshall be: long axis, 11 to 11 1/4 inches; long circumference, 28 to 28 1/2 inches; short circumference, 21 to 21 1/4 inches;weight, 14 to 15 ounces.The Referee shall be the sole judge as to whether all balls offered for play comply with these specifications. A pump is to befurnished by the home club, and the balls shall remain under the supervision of the Referee until they are delivered to theball attendant just prior to the start of the game.

From the Free Dictionaryideal gas lawn.A physical law describing the relationship of the measurable properties of an ideal gas, where P (pressure) × V (volume) = n (number of moles) × R (the gas constant) × T (temperature in Kelvin). It is derived from a combination of the gas laws of Boyle, Charles, and Avogadro. Also called universal gas law.

 

Recommended book on US health care system

I highly recommend this book as a useful summary of the US Health Care System. I have made it required reading (as a reference) for my classes at BU.

The Health Care Handbook: A Clear and Concise Guide to the United States Health Care System, 2nd Edition Paperback – November 15, 2014

by Elisabeth Askin (Author), Nathan Moore (Author)

 

Paper:  $15.99

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0692244735

Electronic: $8.99

http://www.amazon.com/Health-Care-Handbook-Concise-United-ebook/dp/B00PWQ93M8/