As we discussed in LA245, the Supreme Court issued its second dog decision this term this week. In the case, the Court ruled that it is unconstitutional to use a dog to sniff outside a home without a warrant. Completely contrary to the Court’s decision on dogs sniffing cars, the decision confirms the ultimate protection that the Court provides the home.
I wonder if this is Franky, the dog at the heart of this case?
One Comment
Yang Liu Steve posted on April 16, 2013 at 8:54 pm
I took a deep look at Florida v. Jardines. (The case supreme Court rule in favor of the defendant) It seems that it has something more than the protection of home. I am writing the paper on this event. It’s pretty interesting.