The Onion Pokes Fun at Copy Editors

In its trademark satirical manner, the Onion has a humorous go at stereotypical copy editors and their fuss over grammar. Here is an extract:

“At this time we have reason to believe the killings were gang-related and carried out by adherents of both the AP and Chicago styles, part of a vicious, bloody feud to establish control over the grammar and usage guidelines governing American English,” said FBI spokesman Paul Holstein, showing reporters graffiti tags in which the word “anti-social” had been corrected to read “antisocial.”

For the full article, visit onion.com/TGQ6RH.

Boston’s Role In Contemporary Art

Alfred H. Barr, Source: Wikipedia

On Boston's role in the instigation of a new thinking about contemporary art, is an intriguing post by Christopher Shea for the Boston Globe. Here is an extract:

New York’s dominance in producing art can’t be denied—there was no Boston Jackson Pollock, and there were significant delays before modern art hit Boston gallery walls. But Boston can lay claim to a different kind of influence, a new book argues: Some of the thinking that would shape the way that Americans appreciate modern art, helped launch it as a major public spectacle, and shifted our understanding of what could be considered “art” to begin with first took form in a classroom right in suburban Massachusetts.

It occurred thanks to that young Wellesley instructor, who in the 1926-27 academic year began teaching an extraordinary seminar to the daughters of New England’s wealthy families at Wellesley College. Barr was still just a graduate student at Harvard at the time, but the inventive thinking about art that he championed in his course—with an emphasis on bridging the gaps between high and low culture—would shortly explode in influence when he was hired by the new Museum of Modern Art in New York. And his class, small as it was, launched a generation of his students into prominent roles in the art world, helping to spread the gospel of contemporary art as curators, journalists, and critics.
...
“Dazzling in its multidisciplinarity,” Meyer writes, Barr’s course comes across as one of the greatest art history courses ever taught—“a laboratory for the study of a culture very much in the making.” Barr called the 11 students in his course “faculty,” as if they were peers, and he sent them out to research subjects like jazz, or the history of film, to report back to the class. He had musicians play Stravinsky and Schoenberg for his students. Field trips were key. He took students to see the Necco factory in Cambridge, a form-follows-function structure he considered among “the most living and beautiful buildings in New England.” He took them to the National Automobile Show.
...
Great art offers “an invitation to slow down, to think more deeply about things,” says Meyer. So can studying key moments in the fast-changing history of contemporary art. What made Barr important, Meyer suggests, is that he never lost sight of the deep continuity of art, even as he gazed into a disorienting future.

For the full post, visit b.globe.com/13LXobD.

What Machiavelli Knew

Portrait of Niccolo Machiavelli (1469-1527), Santi di Tito (1536-1603)/Palazzo Vecchio (Palazzo della Signoria) Florence, Italy/Bridgeman Art Library

Relating to CC201's study of Niccolo Machiavelli's the Prince, is an article discussing his ideas on whether law can supplant politics. Here is an extract:

One of the peculiarities of political thought at the present time is that it is fundamentally hostile to politics. Bismarck may have opined that laws are like sausages – it’s best not to inquire too closely into how they are made – but for many, the law has an austere authority that stands far above any grubby political compromise. In the view of most liberal thinkers today, basic liberties and equalities should be embedded in law, interpreted by judges and enforced as a matter of principle. A world in which little or nothing of importance is left to the contingencies of politics is the implicit ideal of the age.

The trouble is that politics can’t be swept to one side in this way. The law these liberals venerate isn’t a free-standing institution towering majestically above the chaos of human conflict. Instead – and this is where the Florentine diplomat and historian Niccolò Machiavelli (1469-1527) comes in – modern law is an artefact of state power. Probably nothing is more important for the protection of freedom than the independence of the judiciary from the executive; but this independence (which can never be complete) is possible only when the state is strong and secure. Western governments blunder around the world gibbering about human rights; but there can be no rights without the rule of law and no rule of law in a fractured or failed state, which is the usual result of westernsponsored regime change. In many cases geopolitical calculations may lie behind the decision to intervene; yet it is a fantasy about the nature of rights that is the public rationale, and there is every sign that our leaders take the fantasy for real. The grisly fiasco that has been staged in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya – a larger and more dangerous version of which seems to be unfolding in Syria – testifies to the hold on western leaders of the delusion that law can supplant politics.

Machiavelli is commonly thought to be a realist, and up to a point it is an apt description. A victim of intrigue – after being falsely accused of conspiracy, he was arrested, tortured and exiled from Florence – he was not tempted by idealistic visions of human behaviour. He knew that fear was a more reliable guide to human action than sympathy or loyalty, and accepted that deception will always be part of politics.

That does not make Machiavelli a cynic, still less amoral...

For the full article, visit bit.ly/12NWSoJ.

Citizen Science Project Identifies Species By Their Calls

CC106 delves into the current issues with biodiversity. Here is a sample from an article about exciting new technology that battles these issues:

Global biodiversity is not doing so well these days, with many scientists even believing that we're on the brink of the world's sixth mass extinction.
...
Simply put: We just don't know how well (or how poorly) many species are doing.

A major problem is that assessing the health of species is a costly and time-consuming endeavor, which often requires scientists to repeatedly go into the field to count individual animals or monitor their calls. Sometimes scientists will enlist the help of community volunteers for citizen science programs, but such projects rarely — if ever — benefit species in dense tropical ecosystems or other remote areas.

So to help give experts the long-term data they need to monitor biodiversity, a team of researchers designed a system that automatically records and identifies species, called the Automated Remote Biodiversity Monitoring Network, or ARBIMON.

The Sabana Seca, Puerto Rico ARBIMON station. Courtesy of Mitchell Aide.

To find out more about ARBIMON, visit bit.ly/15HskYR.

How to think of the Web

From Prof. Jon Westling's syllabus for his discussion section of CC 202 in Spring 2004

The Internet [like fire, money, science, water, and other elemental entities] can be a helpful servant, but it is a bad master. In the disciplines of the humanities and the social sciences, unlike in some scientific disciplines, it is not customary for new scholarship to be posted to the Web. Nor are most of the significant articles, monographs and books of earlier generations routinely available online. Finally, most of what is on the Web is unedited: it has not been reviewed for accuracy or cogency. Beware. When in doubt, go to the library.

Well put.

 

Seeing Art Through Austen’s Eyes

A preview of the exhibition "What Jane Saw."

Relating to CC202′s study of Jane Austen's work is an article from the NY Times discussing her ventures into art. Here is an extract:

Now, precisely 200 years later, an ambitious online exhibition called “What Jane Saw” will allow modern-day Janeiacs to wander through a meticulous reconstruction of the exhibition and put themselves, if not quite in Austen’s shoes, at least behind her eyes.

“It’s the closest thing to time travel on the Web,” said Janine Barchas, an associate professor of English at the University of Texas at Austin, who led the project.

The exhibition “was a wonderful moment in the history of celebrity culture,” said Joseph Roach, a professor of theater and English at Yale University and the author of “It” (2007), a cultural history of the charisma that distinguishes “abnormally interesting” people. “There was a new kind of royalty emerging.”

And Austen, Ms. Barchas said, would have been as interested in that new royalty as any modern reader gobbling up TMZ updates about Kate Middleton and Brangelina. In her recent book, “Matters of Fact in Jane Austen,” Ms. Barchas traces the way Austen wove sly nods to actresses, artists, parliamentarians and scandal-ridden aristocrats into her novels — almost “in the spirit of a preteen adorning a bedroom with Justin Bieber posters,” as one reviewer put it.

For the full article, visit nyti.ms/18Di6iv.

The Odyssey – Painting

Relating to CC101's study of The Odyssey is a link to a beautiful painting (oil on canvas) named 'Odysseus Meets Kalypso', by artist Anthony Bijnen: bit.ly/128qgpp.

Notes from the July 2013 EnCore Book Club: Things Fall Apart

Cover of the paperback edition by Anchor Books

This month, EnCore's book club delved into Things Fall Apart, by the renowned and recently deceased Nigerian scholar Chinua Achebe. As described on the back of the paperback 50th Anniversary Edition from Anchor Books, the novel "tells two intertwining stories, both centered on Okonkwo, a 'strong man' of an Ibo village in Nigeria. The first, a powerful fable of the immemorial conflict between the individual and society...The second...concerns the clash of cultures and the destruction of Okonkwo's world with the arrival of aggressive European missionaries."

The discussion veered from cultural integration vs. negation to religion, from politics to colonialism, from narrative techniques to missionaries to reaching outer space. "Should we give medicine to isolated tribes?" and "Is the moon made of green cheese?" were only a few of the mysteries we perused, munching on wraps and drinking beer and wine in the AC-ed Core office this mild Wednesday night.

(Cambridge, MA - November 17, 2008) Novelist Chinua Achebe reads some of his poetry as the guest speaker. Staff Photo Nick Welles/Harvard News Office

Talking Points during the Discussion

We started off the discussion by musing on why the novel is often assigned to high schoolers in the United States, and is often listed as teen fiction and located in teen sections of libraries. Is it because, due to the narrative's seemingly simple language, it is an easily accessible example of foreign literature?

Speaking of which: why is is that this novel, one of the few examples of Nigerian literature widely read in America, has a title that can be considered an anthem to Western modernism, with all the trauma and seismic shifts the movement entailed? The title refers to one of the most famous poem's in the English language, "The Second Coming," written by W. B. Yeats.

During the evening, there were disagreements as to whether we are thrown into the stories and treated as fellow members of the tribe as we followed their victories and travails, or whether the narrative distances us from them, treating the characters as mere objects in the story, trapped under a museum diorama we can never quite access.

Can this story be considered an analogy, a warning folktale for the West as it exited the World Wars not-quite-unscathed? Or do we commit another colonial crime to think of it as such? Should we treat other cultures as museum pieces, in order to "preserve the traditions" we don't disagree with? Join us in our next meeting to voice your own opinion on another great work.

Deep in discussion

Memorable Quotes:

"Stories are how you transmit everything that defines a community."

(Someone pretending to talk to Okonkwo): "You are really embarrassing me in front of all these elders."

"The EU: the largest disaster ever."

Because everything else is accessible, "Space is the only place I can't get to."

"I'm going to argue against progress."

"How culturally unique is this story? The veteran is a dad who grew up poor and thinks his son is a sissy, and occasionally beats his wife. You can put the people almost anywhere."

"All people want is to feel empowered and safe."

On nostalgia: "The 50s: when men were men, and women liked it."

A quote from Buffy the Vampire Slayer: "Caesar didn't say, "I came,  I saw, I conquered, and I felt bad about it."

Suspicious looks from a fellow attendee

 

Gilgamesh – Painting

Relating to CC101's study of Gilgamesh is a link to a beautiful painting (mixed media oil on canvas) of the same name, by artist Farhan Abouassali: bit.ly/13gbhBs.

Losing Longhand?

In a post for the National Post, Andrew Coyne discusses the recent drop in students' ability to write long-hand, and the potential harms that this could bring. Here is an extract:

Typing is file retrieval, remembering where a letter is. With handwriting, you create the letters anew each time, using much more complex motor skills. Whether it’s the flowing motion of the arm, or the feel of the page under your hand, or the aesthetic satisfaction of a well-turned “f”, it seems to engage the more intuitive, right-brain aspects of cognition.

Handwriting forces us to make an investment. The words are there on the page; we can’t change them, except to scratch them out. It inclines us thus to compose the sentence in our heads first — and the sort of sentence you can compose and keep in your head is likely to be shorter and clearer than otherwise. Your readers will generally thank you.

For the full post, visit bit.ly/11DaXte.