Neruda Sonnet

I’m an unlikely source to post anything about love (much less a love poem), but I’m getting married in about a week and was charged with choosing the readings for the ceremony.  After slogging through the obligatory Biblical passages (I’m Catholic and my fiancee is Episcopal, which is kind of like Diet Catholic), I was told I could choose one non-religious piece.  I jumped at the opportunity and decided to choose a poem despite the fact that I know little to nothing about poetry.  I turned to one of my friends and MFA poetry colleagues, and after a few days’ deliberation, she offered me two options.  My favorite of the two is linked below:

http://www.poetryfoundation.org/poem/179257 

I like this poem.  I like its specificity and complexity.  Love—not reduced or sentimentalized—but described like the inscrutable mystery it is.   “Love is patient, love is kind.”  Fine.  Better: Love is strange, and I don’t quite fathom it.  It exists “between the shadow and the soul” and I look forward to a life striving to illuminate it.

Struck by Lightning

My best friend's house was struck by lightning. Twice. In the same year. The recent storms in the south and midwest gave me occasion to remember this.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/26/us/26storm.html?hp

I grew up in a small town in Texas, close to the Gulf of Mexico, so neither my best friend nor I am a stranger to severe weather. But the incidents at issue didn't occur during a hurricane. They were just ordinary storms that did extraordinary damage—not only to the house (which had to be rebuilt twice)—but presumably to the psyches of the family living within that house (no one was physically injured either time). My best friend and his family are all good, hard-working, austere Mormons who couldn't be more humble or kind. I couldn't help asking my friend, half-seriously after the second lightning-sparked fire: Do you think God is trying to tell you something?

I don't remember what he said. Undoubtedly, something quite sensible and forthright. My friend is the kind of person whose house can get struck by lightning and simply evacuate, pick up the pieces, rebuild and move on. I'm not like that.

Coming from the Gulf, I have a fascination with weather. Hurricanes feature prominently in both a play I've written and a novel I'm writing. What could be more dramatic than the sky opening up to swallow the earth where you stand? When I read articles like the one above, I see the difference between news and art.

Ruin is news. Headlines with grim body counts. Lightning strikes—twice!—and the world takes note.

Art invites us to linger longer, measuring catastrophe, not in lives lost, but in lives altered. Ruin, of course, is awesome and often devastating, but it’s the human resistance to ruin that can be both expansive and even epic.

What If…Theatres Took Deep Dives With Playwrights?

First, thanks and a hat tip to local playwright, Patrick Gabridge, for turning me on to this.

Second, "deep dive"?  Wait, is that like "hooking up"? I'm always a bit leery about using words and phrases that I suspect require a visit to the urban dictionary.

David Dower is the Associate Artistic Director at the Arena Stage (I'm sure Ilana knows him) and here he's wondering what it would be like if theaters produced not just one play, but a few plays by a single playwright in a season.

It's an interesting read and it's also the dream of more than a few playwrights: To have an audience hear their voice loud and clear. Of course, that means you have to have a substantial body of work to pull from, but that's just details.

Blog Change-Over

Readers: We're marking a shift in blog authorship round these parts.  The spring semester has ended, and the summer session is about to begin.  I welcome a new batch of blog authors: graduate MFA playwriting & creative writing students at BU who are taking my summer course, The Dramaturg/Playwright Relationship.  Stay tuned and see what current arts news gets their motors running!

Digital Dramaturgy by Your Peers

Check out Naomi Lindh's experiment with digital dramaturgy for HOMEBODY/KABUL:

http://dr408-homebody.tumblr.com/

And here's Phil Berman's work on the Company One production of Jason Grote's 1001:

http://companyone1001.tumblr.com/

Love it!

Deaf Culture and our Hedda Gabler

Take a look at this video that came out on BU Today...today...a bit of shameless self promotion, but I also think you'll applaud this video Ilana, and be even more happy that you're coming tonight. I loved hearing the signers physical tactics of how they play different characters. I agree with the last statement in the clip that it really does add to the creative potential of the play.

http://www.bu.edu/today/node/12917

I read this, too.

Get drunk interviewing Allen Johnson and listen to him tell stories? Yeaaa

http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Content?oid=175308

And… if I dare, and I do, my response to Allen Johnson’s “Another You”

Initial response in my journal: “I’m crying. Breathing in a way I don’t know how. I feel something in the pit of my stomach right above my uterus or right in front of it I don’t know. The search for God or the Universe, or The Bigger thing out there is every day happening. Wasted time is never wasted, it is learned from. I want to find this man, grab him by the arm, turn him around violently so that my fingertips have become white and the skin and fat of his arm is hugging my fingers and tell him, I’m your woman. Throw me up against a wall, take me out to dinner, tell me I’m not perfect, LET THE WATER FROM THE SHOWER HIT YOUR ASSHOLE WHILE YOU HOLD YOUR ASSCHEEKS OPEN, I’m your woman. If he’s married—I laugh through a brutal inhalation of the junk in my nose—then he loves her and she loves him and they are inside and outside each other. Maybe he’s not looking for THAT WOMAN, maybe he’s looking to connect with as many people as possible. He’s dirty but so clean because he discloses himself. ‘What you do not make known will destroy you.’ He doesn’t let that happen.”

Johnson decides to go a push further with his confessional-monologue-type writing, owning his position as an American white male. I am not one bit offended by what he refers to in his interview with Lane Czaplinksi as his “unrepentantly male and American libido.” He argues that it has every bit as much right to be heard the way feminism needs a voice; that both sides need to be brought to the table. I agree with him wholeheartedly. It is impossible to have one without the other. He is in fact heavily influenced by women. The only male writer he can think of who has had an impact on him is Cornell West. His top two inspirations are Joan Didion and Susan Sontag. He hopes that when people see Another You, that they can derive from it somehow that he “spent a great deal of time listening” to the later generations of feminists.

The play opens in total darkness, Johnson’s voice in V.O. Something about how he was in the shower after his girlfriend hit him in the back of the head, feeling and letting the water hit him, he’s talking in stream of consciousness. The lights fade in, red, on something. It’s a toilet, with a man sitting on it, ass-naked. Towards the end of the V.O. monologue, he gets up, we see his balls as he pulls his pants up, and the lights come up as he finishes buttoning his fly, loud bar music comes on, he opens his mouth and starts talking and there I go. Gone. Some kind of fucking arrow has pierced me. My heart is beating hard—not fast, hard. If ever I meet Allen Johnson, I will melt.

There is no doubt about it in my eyes, the man deeply respects Woman. It bewilders me that some accuse him of writing misogyny for the stage. There is not an ounce of it in Another You. He goes from telling a story about how in high school, he would jerk off using the house vacuum cleaner, waiting for the mailwoman to come just so he could see her ass through the slit that she drops envelopes through… to remembering kindergarten nap time with this girl that he used to lie across from, “and [they] would just look. Just that, look.” And how nice it was to know that there was someone who really appreciated you being there. He talks about how she would pick her nose, he does the same as he recounts it, like a little girl, innocently. “I should have died then, it would’ve been a perfect life.” I believe him. I know what he’s talking about. He even says, in the interview, that if one were to look at the world through the lens of men vs. women, logistically speaking, “Women. Are running. The entire show; women are running… the world. Every bit of male war, anger, violence is this just… awfully pathetic attempt to try and make up for the fact that every male started as a group of cells in a woman’s body.” This is coming from a man who brands himself as one of those males. He glorifies Woman, even at her nastiest and least perfect; in one story, begs to find the “dirtiest her” who would pull him into a fitting room with a 3-sided mirror and “fuck [his] face.” He describes many moments with many girlfriends, stories interspersed, but there is one that stands out to me in particular.

He and she met at a social gathering of some sort, and he asked her if she would just want to get together soon and read, that’s it, just read, and she said sure. Two days later, it happens at her place, they read in their own corners, she refills his tea. She puts music on, Chet Baker, whom he had never heard. In this moment, he takes the time to acknowledge Chet Baker not only as an unmistakably gifted jazz player, but also hearing something else in the music: a  frightened boy running home to his mother in the rain. Perhaps a reflection upon himself… and what follows is a very intimate and vulnerable moment which he shares with us. This woman kisses him right under his left ear, leads him quietly into her bedroom, lies him down on top of her and holds him. Then “she does this thing,” he says. She hikes up her shirt to her arm pits, and does the same to his, and presses him in closer to her, just so more skin could be touching. A moment of contact. “Thank you. For having been so close. And for being something I will never be able to understand.”

He says the same thing after having told a story about his father, just before this last one. “Thank you. For being so close, and for being something I will never understand.” He and his father had an extremely tumultuous relationship. Johnson always wanted to connect more with him, to understand him. One would think, after being raped by his father at the age of 3, that this would put a damper on things. It did, sure. Still, Johnson never lost respect for his father, who taught him multitudes. He sees his father when he looks down at his own hands. He sees his father’s hands reaching for the bottle of Jack Daniel’s in the cupboard while he’s telling Allen a story before bed, taking one swig, and putting it back. He remembers stories of violent acts his father’s hands have committed at all ages.

Violence is recurring in this play. When prompted to answer the question why, Johnson, admittedly frustrated, responds that it’s because it’s a part of his life, that’s why. “Physical violence has informed who I am on a deep, deep, deep level.” But what interests him isn’t the why, it’s the what. What is it. By making known his own experiences, he is asking [the world], “What is that need…. that we have, societally, to beat up on each other?”

“What kind of connection or expression is at the root of that?”

In the play he begins to answer these questions. He mentions a time when his mother would hit him, maybe strike a bone, and he would tell her, “God you’re strong. And then we’d talk about what was for dinner.” Between two individuals, violence creates a bond. It is hard, raw, inescapable, brute contact demanding both people to be here and now. The bond is in what fills each violent gesture. The bond is in that what, which can only be answered by the individual(s) in the situation.

In the midst are questions about how God fits into all this. About how God is a question. When Johnson uses the word, “God,” it is the first time that I do not immediately relate the word to an organized religion. There is a beautiful moment when the stage is in total darkness, and the only sound is his voice on V.O. overlapping ambient music. He is thanking God for all the things he not able to do or say. He is asking for 5 honest minutes with this woman. He is being in the moment. He is in this moment asking what is God, what can this force do, what is this… impalpable thing so many of us on this planet pray, beg, speak to, find comfort in, get angry at, rely on, blame, heed, fear, disbelieve, fail to understand time and time again?

God, Sex(uality), Violence, Love. The power each of these have is touched on in Johnson’s attempt to reach higher ground. Or perhaps just ground.

I have fallen in some kind of Love with a man that I have never met. I would challenge him, pick his brain, chase him, make him chase me, talk to him, argue with him, dare to push through the rough times with him. My heart is still beating furiously. Questions, questions, questions. What is it with my desire to destroy things? What is my fascination with beating someone’s face to a pulp? Would I ever? Who am I going to have children with? When am I going to fall in love next? Do I know him already? Why, after 8 years, have I still not gotten over wanting to be a cleaner, yes, a hitman? Notice I didn’t say hitwoman? Why do I have so much trouble accepting my womanhood at times? What is my God? What greater power do I believe in? What is this world we live in, and is it worth bringing children into? Does sex imperatively have to “mean something?” Do I have to be ashamed of the things I do behind closed doors? Even if I know I don’t have to be, but I still am, how do I get rid of feeling dirty? Or do I not get rid of it, but accept it? What turns me on? What turns me off? Am I going to physically discipline my kids? How much time is there? What am I doing with it? Am I gay (he asks himself that, too)?

This is how we live our lives. In vignettes, fragmented; transitions are not smooth, instead there are quick turns, whacks in the head, questions don’t always get answered. Like in this paper. Like in Another You.

My response to YJL’s “The Shipment”

In an interview with Lane Czaplinski about The Shipment, YJL talks about how there is not as much of a spotlight on racism against Asian-Americans as there is one on racism against African-Americans. Being Korean, and so on the outside of black-white discrimination, has allowed her to witness it in such a way that she can thus write on the matter objectively. When she is asked why she wrote a black American identity politics play, she honestly answers that after Songs of the Dragons Flying to Heaven, an Asian-American identity politics play, “race plays still weren’t cool, so [she guessed she] was just gonna keep doing that.” (interview with Lane Czaplinski) More importantly, “The idea really terrified [her], so [she]decided to just go for it.” (gothamist, 1/22/09) The Shipment tackles issues of race and stereotyping, both white and black. No white person, except maybe Eminem, could have written this play without being accused of being racist.  Even the previous sentence is questionably racist.  It is a fine line. The fact that YJL is Korean reinforces the attention that must be paid to this subject. As someone indirectly affected by it, she is able to, allowed to, take various scenarios out of context, throw them up on a stage and unapologetically say, “here, take a look. Really, here you go. I see it every day, and you do too. I know that, you know that. Except I’m lucky to have an outside perspective, so I can help you see it better. It might hurt, and you’ll probably cringe. That’s normal. Just watch, listen, think, and respond.”

The plays opens with a dance piece set to the tune of “F. N. T” by Semisonic, an awesome 90’s hit. Two of the 5 actors dance playfully, abstractly to alternative rock with lyrics like, “I’m surprised that you’ve never been told before/ that you’re lovely and you’re perfect/ that somebody wants you.” It is a nice, sweet, nondescript overture abruptly halted when on comes a great rap song and the dancers swagger offstage, leaving place to the voice over introduction of another cast member, Douglas Scott Streater, as a stand-up comedian.  He practically flies onstage, makes lewd sexual foreplay gestures that I legitimately did not understand the purpose of, acknowledges Seattle, and begins a sketch about differences between black and white people.  Not once does he suggest that one is better than the other, but he does point out the painfully obvious to the white folks in the audience, myself very much included. In one instance, he riffs on those who proclaim themselves to be colorblind, “does this [circling around his face with his pointer finger] look like a tan to you, mothafucka?” This punch line elicits a lot of laughter, both genuine and uncomfortable, because it’s absolutely true that many white people say they do not see race (and don’t tell me I need a source to prove this somehow)… Streeter implies the question plainly: HOW IS THAT REMOTELY POSSIBLE? I hereby commit to never pretending to be colorblind, and never doing colorblind casting in my plays that I may direct throughout my lifetime, unless it is called for.

He also makes fun of white people who tiptoe around black people, and are careful with what they say and how they say it…  ending up praising, “don’t stop! keep going! I like it when you’re worried about what your next move is!” This makes me feel better about when I do the exact same thing. After all this, however, he willingly admits that he’s often scared to walk into a room full of black people himself, because he doesn’t actually speak in person the way he does onstage. White people talk vs. street talk.  He confesses he’s even been accused of modifying his speech in order to accouter to a white audience, stating that he is guilty as charged.

This man speaks the truth about the big and little issues of the black-white phenomena so harshly that he makes his audience either laugh, or shut up and listen. Between YJL’s use of tone and language in the text, and Streeter’s performance, this segment is extremely effective. There are moments where he so attacks the audience with the pitch and direction of his voice on the words that in those moments, what we are watching is the polar opposite of a comedy sketch. Suffice it to say, that is YJL’s intention; to bring serious matter to light surrounded by other slightly less serious matter than can be made fun of.

Above all it is informative about things we already know but do not want to, do not care to, do not have the time to pay attention to outside of the realm of the theatres this play is performed in. I was blown away by Streeter’s comment on the concept of “Even Steven.” I had never in my life thought about it in the terms he put it in. According to him/YJL, this is how white people understand the concept: “if I got this much stuff [indicating a lot], and you got this much stuff [indicating very little], and somebody comes over and gives us a cookie, we gonna split that cookie straight down the middle.” He begins with how much white people love the concept of Even Steven and by the time he gets to making fun of black people, he adds in, “and now all the white people in the audience are goin ‘Eeven Steeven, Eeeeven Steeeeven!’” while making a jerking off motion with his free hand. He was right! I admit it, I did feel that way for a second. I say for a second, because then I remembered my place.

This play then becomes about place; knowing one’s place. I can’t even begin to wrap my head around what mine is at this point in time. There’s a sensation of owing an apology to a big picture, and the need to do right by blank. I do not know what that blank is. What would Streeter say to that?

Learning the hierarchy of race, and how it falls nowadays. Who respects who and under what circumstances? A question unanswered by the play itself. The ideal answer would be that everybody ought to respect each other under all circumstances, something I feel the play conveys without saying. On the other hand, something else that comes through the play is that life is not as such, but that at the very least, we can make efforts to acknowledge the discrepancies and do our best to fix them.

But you see the thing is…  If that is the case, why is it more acceptable in modern/pop culture for black people to make jokes about white people? I mean really—seriously this time—even if the most respected white rapper & hip-hop artist Eminem goes and does an entire comedy sketch out of black-white racism stereotype jokes, leaning heavily on the black jokes, while throwing in a few white jokes. (Picture it.) Then he and the rest of his all-white cast act in a naturalistic dining room drama in which the audience gradually discovers that the actors are in fact portraying black stock characters that Eminem had made fun of in his sketch, and ends with the two lines:

“We wouldn’t be playing this game if there was a white person in the room.”

“Depends on what kind of white person it was.”

Blackout.

I’ve but a mere hunch that this would cause much more uproar than YJL’s play as it stands. Maybe I should write that play… Christ, I’d be crucified. And get Eminem to act in it. But then he would think it’s racist and he wouldn’t do it! Because he’s a rapper & hip-hop artist—music traditionally belonging to the African-American culture. I wonder if he’s allowed to say the word “nigga.”

I acknowledge that now I’m getting defensive. While I think I’ve made it perfectly clear that I agree with what YJL’s play is telling us, I also question, and through questioning I come to realization[s]. That’s what this play makes people do! It really has one [re]evaluate the way he or she looks at and sees this component of our daily lives. Now. I literally just noticed how I’ve neglected to write about the abstract segment of the play, and the a capella song, which fall (in that order) in between the comedy sketch and the naturalist play. The abstract segment is a deadpan, almost puppet-like, simplified version of the life of a black kid who doesn’t go to college because he wants to become a rap star and the steps he has to take in order to get there. Sell drugs, make money, do drugs, get involved in drug war, get famous, philander, do drugs, kill someone, go to jail, get visited by his dead grandma… this is not all in the right order, I apologize. The deadpanness of the piece gives it a slapstick detached quality; another wonderful tactic used by YJL to shed light on a touchy subject few people wish to address. It’s also a way of showing us how engrained that step-by-step process is, like “how to be cool.” When in fact, it’s really not cool. It’s dangerous and sad.  The same goes for rich white prep school kids who sell and do mountains of coke to the point of destroying their septums, and go to rehab 2 or 3 times before graduating high school. To cleanse our pallet follows an a capella version of Modest Mouse’s “Dark Center of The Universe” sung by two men and the woman. “Well it took a lot of work to be the ass I am, and I’m pretty sure that anyone can equally, easily fuck you over.” It is tragic, beautiful, deceptively simple and complicated at the same time… Human. Like the rest of the play.  Thank you Young Jean Lee for sharing your wisdom and taking me on this ride.

ArtsEmerson 2011-12 Lineup

Boston's ArtsEmerson has announced its lineup for next season, and it looks really good. Read about it here.

From John Malkovich to one of my favorite contemporary musicians, Laurie Anderson in a solo multimedia piece, AND a new play by The Civilians, this is a killer lineup of leading edge theater. Here is a link to ArtsEmerson's site, check it out.

Aunt Dan and Lemon with Whistler…

Wallace Shawn's play with Whistler in the Dark gets good reviews at The Factory Theatre, and our own Bridget O'Leary directed it. Jonathan Clark, the reviewer of DigBoston, recalls leaving the theatre "reconsidering [his] notions of global and personal morality," which I'm thrilled to hear because I love walking away from a piece of theatre with this kind of experience. I've had it a few times this semester seeing contemporary theatre in boston, so not I'm convinced to make it to Aunt Dan and Lemon. Who's coming with me the 14th, 15th or 19th?

http://digboston.com/experience/2011/05/from-the-aisle-aunt-dan-and-lemon/

New Kushner

Tony Kushner's new play, entitled, "The Intelligent Homosexual's Guide to Capitalism and Socialism With A Key to the Scriptures" opened tonight at the Public Theatre in New York. The show previously opened at the Guthrie theatre in 2009, and some of the cast members have been involved with the show since then. The play follows a family whose patriarch suddenly announces he is planning to commit suicide. Reviews of the production point out the similarities between "Guide" and "Angels in America", Kushner's most notable work. Both plays question the very philosophies and ideologies we choose to believe in, whether they be religious or political. I have a feeling that Walter Benjamin's name would've come up more than a few times had we been able to have a class discussion on this play.

Tony nominations

Great NYT review of the nominations here. A quick read for a study break.

How would You fix spider man?

http://brooklynrail.org/2011/04/theater/the-shame-of-theater

This article was pretty eye opening to me as far as an articulation of the struggles and frustrations of getting new works out in the world.

Check it out.

Crystal Skillman

She reviews a play called Let it Rain: The Umbrella plays.

http://brooklynrail.org/2011/04/theater/let-it-rain-director-daniel-talbott-and-playwright-stephanie-janssen-reopen-the-umbrella-plays

This is a really well written review and portrait of this play experience. It seems like a  really intimate and profound piece.

The birth of a play…

Great insight into the playwriting process...

Playwright Margaret Baldwin explains how an idea for a play began, and then the twists and turns it took during the telling of the story.

Taking an idea, then adding dramatic action and conflict.

On birth and racism

This article in today's Boston Globe is particularly relevant to many of the plays we've been reading on race and ethnicity. The thrust of the issue – the "birther" stupidity – is one we've all been reading about for months in the news, and this article gives broad and historical reasons for the insidious chase to "clarify" President Obama's legitimacy. I am sickened by this ridiculous and very public cyber-lynching of our first black president. Not a theater article, but a must read for all of the work we've been doing in this class.

The Ground Floor New Play Series

Ok, you can file this under Shameless Acts of Self-Promotion...

Starting Sunday at Boston Playwrights' Theatre, plays from BU's playwriting program will be given staged readings by some of Boston's finest actors and actresses. Also, on Monday, South Bridge, by Ohio University MFA Candidate Reginald Edmund, will be read. I attended Ohio U. as an undergrad; it's where I first studied acting and got bit by the theater bug really hard. It's still a great program, and still runs the Monomoy Theater in Chatham on the Cape.

The other three playwrights are Heather Houston, Peter Floyd, and me.

Tickets are free, and you can get them here. I know it's the end of the semester and everyone is flat out with final shows and Contemporary Drama notebooks, but if you're interested in new works, and curious about what some of the up and coming playwrights in Boston are doing, these evenings will be well-worth your time. .

I've spent the past nine months watching the progression of these plays, and both Peter's and Heather's take on big topics with interesting structures. You can read more about Heather's play, Supergravity and the Eleventh Dimension here. Peter's play is called Absence and info about it will be posted later. If you're on BPT's list watch for it; if you're not, why not?

If you're curious about what I've been up to with my play Highland Center, Indiana, you can read more here and here.

Simplicity and Lightness

Something about my panel's discussions this week connecting Culture Clash and Drew Hayden Taylor, especially in regards to their humor, reminded me of Fragments. And I had the thought last night, with Sophie and Amelia, and then it flew away. But for those who saw Fragments, didn't it make you understand the human condition so deeply through such a simple, light staging and physical ease? I was laughing my head off and being relieved of the mundane pangs, and every day difficulties of life. My Fragments response paper 1st paragraph, and the rest is in the google docs link:

Fragments:

Simple Splices of Life

Peter Brook’s Fragments immaculately offered: simplicity is the answer when delivering a message to a theatre audience. We’ve talked about the power of art, especially in live theatre, specifying that the enlightening experience has everything to do with the audience’s perception and presence during the event. Two of the actors Hayley Carmichael and Yoshi Oida spoke to this in the talk back on Sunday March 27th at the Paramount Theatre. Yoshi prioritizes his “being naked” on stage and “taking off his costume” in order to just be himself, so he can be available to the invisible connection that will happen between him and the audience. I completely sensed this during the performance. Not to mention, I’m a believer in this invisible connection, as an actor and theatre artist I aim for it. Apparently Peter Brook’s rehearsal guidance to “simple action” contributed to this attitude of Yoshi’s. And Hayley admitted that a short rehearsal process and frequent traveling forced her to allow her performance to be different every night, unique to the energy in the theatre and audience. Moreover, I think Peter Brook’s directing aesthetics are evident in his inspirations and amalgamations in Fragments in the first place! I have so much respect for what Peter Brook dares to do. Clearly, he’s had a lot of experience experimenting, but I so deeply wish that more theatre artists could see how simple—but specific and strong—choices are as penetrating a theatrical experience as highly technical spectacle…Perhaps this wish comes from such a deep place in me because it’s what I desire to achieve. This is how imprinting Fragments was on me.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jbUKHTlrnJUaCme_sbJQnxPea9cn3YeYZ2u9jja5qls/edit?hl=en#

Exciting News for the Huntington!

This morning, the Huntington Theatre Company announced that it has been given a $10 million gift from the Calderwood Charitable Foundation!

Read more here.