Other Desert Cities

other desert citiesThough my Thanksgiving break was altogether much too short, I am blessed to have been able to see some incredible theatre over the few days I had. One of the best things about being in this program is that I have acquired a theatrical capacity for much more than the commercial. Being encouraged to see smaller, artistically driven and intellectually founded works has broadened my own taste palate and my desire investigate daring theatre companies. However, that being said, I still love Broadway.

As Chloe wrote, she and I got to see Jon Robin Baitz’ Other Desert Cities last Wednesday night. We got student tickets, which we should all take advantage of as long as we live (considering BU IDs do not have graduation years on them), and sat in the Orchestra of the Booth Theatre for thirty dollars. Amazing. It was the first time I think I’d seen a play asking me to totally empathize with a rich, white, conservative, Republican family. All hell breaks loose at the Wyeth house when their daughter (played by Rachel Griffiths) comes home for Christmas with her soon-to-be-published manuscript containing some of the family’s deepest secrets. Linked above you’ll find the Times review, but I thought I’d share some of my own thoughts on the production as well.

More and more I realize that the success of a family sitting room drama is largely dependent upon the strength of the actors on stage. In Joe Mantello’s production of Other Desert Cities, the performances were strong enough to keep the integrity of the play, but not strong enough to move me. I found myself wishing that I could have read the play before seeing it, because the words outshone the actors. The actors were putting something on the words that I would never be able to forget or take back. That is not to say that this was a bad production, it was well directed and the performances of Thomas Sadoski and Judith Light were well worth the endeavor. It just made me realize how important first encounters with a play are.

Early in high school I saw an absolutely atrocious, horrendous, heinous, horrific production of Antigone. I had not read Antigone previously, and from that point forward I thought I would hate that play for the rest of my life. Having never read the words, my entire experience with that play was based off of the one encounter I had with this production. When we did thorough dramaturgical readings of Antigone for our projects this semester, it was as though I were seeing it for the first time. Though I still have that god-awful production seared in my memory, it can’t ruin the play for me anymore.

I want to read Baitz’ play, not because I think it’s better than Mantello’s production gives it credit for, but because I think it would enhance my understanding of the piece. This is the first time in my life where I think plays are as equally meant to be read as they are seen. Not one or the other. Not literary or visual, but both. All persons of the theatre should both see and read the works we invest our time and money in. They are two parts of a whole experience. I hope that I can get my hands on this script pretty soon, and perhaps share more evolved thoughts on this theory when I do.

John Cage, that’s enough out of you… And a $$ diagram people might like.

So remember Cage and 4'33" and all the talking we did about that last year? And in Art History, if anyone's taken some for any reason, that covers recent-ish stuff? Or just plain History; I think we talked about it in high school. Anyway, I'm on board mostly. I think it's an interesting, paradigm-shifting idea, and I like examining my relationship with silence... blah, blah.

Did you know he also has a piece that will run for 639 years? Apparently it started in 2001, and you have to wait months for a chord change. Whaaaaat.

Fans of Cage, such as board chairman of the town’s John Cage Organ Foundation, Rainer Neugebauer, say that the performance is a rebuke of hectic modern life.

“Everything does not need to happen so fast. If something needs a bit longer then it can give us an inner calm that is rare in normal life.”

Okay...

Update, Nov. 28: There is competition for the world’s longest concert. On Twitter, Mark Polishook alerts Arts Post to Longplayer, a 1,000-year-long musical score that is being played by computers.

You have to admit, it's a little funny. I also find it fascinating in terms of - church organ vs. computer, and generally how we're in a place where besides thinking of this stuff we can automate it...mechanically and electronically! When I read the title of the initial article about a 639-year concert, I was imagining that Cage thought he was going to live that long and had committed to playing something constantly, or there were multiple artists playing in shifts, and I was like, "Uh, buddy..." but no. It's more like installation art, I guess, or a very long-lived exhibit, like the Gutenberg Bible. Can we still use the word "concert"?

Unrelatedly, but VERY interestingly...

Click here for an image I didn't want to post as "theatre news" exactly but found super-helpful in light of all the talking we're doing about relative amounts of money. Information presented accessibly - for me, at least - so I thought other people might enjoy it as well. Definitely click through to the "huge" version and look closely!

Musical Theatre for TV?

In this day and age, Glee makes many attempts to bring musical theatre into the mainstream, and (in my opinion) often compromises kitsch for art. However, a new show has been picked up with plans to air this January, directly following the Superbowl. SMASH, a new show explores the notion of what it takes to be on Broadway. Executive Producer Steven Spielberg has cast numerous theatre and broadway musical theatre veterans to bring his new show to life.

Smash follows a composer/ lyricist pairing Tom and Julia as they begin to write a musical based on the life and times of Marilyn Monroe. Unsure as to whether or not their musical will be a hit or a miss, they utilize the modern age of technology and post one of their songs on youtube. The response to the song and the music is tremendous and soon catches the eye of a big time producer. After multiple rounds of out of town tryouts, the plot thickens as we meet the two girls who are pitted against each other to play the iconic Marilyn Monroe. The question boils down to whether the role should go to the talented newcomer or the big time (washed up?) broadway veteran.

When I heard about Smash, I was extremely skeptical. When Glee first arrived on the television scene, I wasn't sure what to think. At first, I embraced it with open arms; However, as time went by, I really felt as though Glee was simply making fun of theatre people and what it is to be an artist and a performer in today's society. However, I think Smash truly has the potential to be so much more than that... The cast alone boasts so much Star Power from both Hollywood AND the Great White Way. I have faith that this star studded cast in combination with Spielberg's unbelievable background and producing chops, this show has the potetential to really be a home run. It marries the theatre and the television industry and has the ability to bring art to the home. It doesn't require you to spend mass amounts of money to go to the theatre. After all, the true magic of theatre is happening right in your living room.

Who knows, maybe this will make me a believer again...

One Man Production of Macbeth Arrives in NYC

An unbelieveable production of the Scottish play, produced by the Scots themselves? Who would've thought?...

The National Theatre of Scotland has plans to mount its unique production of "Macbeth" this summer as part of the Lincoln Center Festival. This production, unlike anything you've ever seen, boasts a star studded cast. A single star. THAT IS CORRECT. Broadway veteran Alan Cumming will be starring in Macbeth, as a One Man Show. Cumming, known for his work in "The Good Wife" and "Cabaret" and a true Scotsman at heart, will depict each and every role in the Scotish tragedy including the title role, as well as Lady Macbeth, the three witches, Macduff, The Ghost...the list goes on and on and on...This special production is set to co-directed by John Tiffany and And Goldberg. The production is set to originate in Glasgow and then travel overseas as a part of the festival from July 5th-July 14th.

Alan Cumming, the “Good Wife” and “Cabaret” star (not to mention the voice of another great Scot, Gutsy Smurf), will perform every single role in the Shakespeare tragedy, including the regicidal schemer of its title and his devious, spot-obsessed wife (though we’re especially intrigued to see what he does with the three witches). The production, to be directed by John Tiffany and Andy Goldberg, will originate in June at the Tramway in Glasgow, and then be presented at the Lincoln Center Festival in New York from July 5 through July 14.

The original idea was extracted from an Interview with The Guardian. This project began as a simple idea: to swap the roles of Macbeth and Lady Macbeth. The play discusses so many important themes regarding gender: the role of power and authority, psychology (and reverse psychology for that matter), action, and responsibility. The prospect of swapping the roles was really intriguing and inspiring for Alan Cumming. After the first reading, which took place in New York, Andy Goldberg suggested that Cumming play all of the roles...

And so the idea was born. Theatre goers and critics alike are anxiously awaiting this incredibly innovative production of Macbeth as it explores the notion of what it truly means to be power hungry.

Making Theatre More Accessible to Its Audiences

With all the buzz around this relatively new project, it is no surprise to theatre goers that “The Book of Mormon” is still the hottest ticket on Broadway. It is nearly impossible to get tickets. requiring audiences to purchase them for large amounts of money and way in advance. There isn’t even a student rush option, which would make the show more available to young theatre goers.

However, Trey Parker, Matt Stone, and Robert Lopez have decided to reconvene in the writing room in the “South Park” studio in order to make the show more available to audiences who don’t have the luxury of spending the money or trekking to New York City to see the hottest musical on Broadway.

I have been forever been a fan of South Park and when they released “Book of Mormon”, I knew it would be revolutionary…In the writing room, they have not yet had a moment to meet so they cannot fully disclose any information about this special episode that has fans anxiously awaiting its release. They have not yet decided whether or not it will feature musical numbers or whether crab people will be present. However, they said that despite the fact that it would be wonderful for them to make it more available to the public, another reason they are considering it is because “you always need to pay the bills…”

Center for Puppetry Arts

The Center for Puppetry Arts was recently recognized as the winner of the Pinnacle Award for 2010-2011. It was honored by the Center for Interactive Learning and Collaboration, more commonoly referred to as the CILC.

This award is given out every year to an organization that shows tremendous work in students ranging from Kindergarten through 12th grade. The award is given based on a scoring system/ test of sorts that is required of the students. It is a wonderful way to bring the arts to the next generation while still working wonders on their education.

Based in Atlanta, The CILC was established in 1994 as a non-profit organization with a means to use new technology and the arts to further educate the youth of america. The program works by employing the latest technology in order to teach hands on puppet building to young students. A series of developmental workshops are conducted that teach the process of hands on puppet building and all of the different facets that this includes. The lessons use advanced technology that allows for videoconferencing. The puppetry is infused with different lessons that these students may be studying in primary school. For example: science, social studies, and the language arts have been incorporated into these lessons in order to make learning more creatively stimulating and enjoyable.

“It is such an honor to be recognized on a national level by the CILC,” said Patty Petrey Dees, Director of the Distance Learning program at the Center for Puppetry Arts. “We are extremely proud to be the only content provider in North America to receive this award four years in a row!”

Studio 54 Reimagined…

This past week, Broadway legend Tommy Tune was seen putting the finishing touches on his new musical Fifty Four Forever. Tommy Tune, who is no foreigner to the Great White Way was an engaging actor, fantastic director, and astounding choreographer. He was to join the ranks of Broadway legends such as Bob Fosse and Michael Bennet; however, he disappeared off the map.

He was made famous after he received a Tony Award for his work in “Seesaw” in 1973. This paved the way for tune to begin to exercise his ability to direct. It seemed that he had found his calling and went on to produce some of the best musicals of his generation: “The Best Little Whorehouse in Texas”, “Nine”, “Grand Hotel”, and “The Will Rogers Follies”. It seemed as if his career would work itself. However, “The Best Little Whorehouse Goes Public” and “Busker Alley” were both major flops that premeired in 1990. Closing after a month and during previews respectively, these productions began to highlight a major issue that was occurring on Broadway at the time. Tune began to see that Broadway was no longer a mecca for originality. Instead, it played host to many revivals and shows that “played it safe”. Producers were solely concerned with making a profit and were scared to invest their time in something that may have seemed too advanced and that period in time.

Fifty Four Forever is centered around the Golden Age of Studio 54. the plays central focus follows Steve Rubell, who brought Studio 54 to life after the sun went down. Here, endless lines of hopeful people stood behind those iconic rope lines just to get in. The play also spends time focusing on the many patrons that spent ample time in 54: Liza Minelli, Andy Warhol, and Truman are among those that grace the stage with their presence. The famous manic DJ and dancing shirtless men can also be found in the glitz and glamour of this crazy world. As the club continues to spin more and more out of control, we track Rubell’s downfall, which came as a result of the seduction of an IRS agent.

Although many books have been published documenting Rubell’s rise and fall and the movie “54″ starring Mike Myers was premiered, a stage production has never been imagined. In an interview, Tommy Tune stated, “I just got tired of playing by the rules of commercial theater, of producers and their fear of the critics driving everything, and I decided to start working in places where those confining rules didn’t exist,” said Mr. Tune, who decamped to Las Vegas to work on shows and now splits his time between New York and South Beach. Still, he added, “I’d love to be doing a new Broadway show.”

Hopefully, Fifty Four Forever will bring Tune out of the dirt and back to the Great White Way. And who knows….maybe he will have the opportunity to showcase his work at the original Studio 54…

Boston Theatre Pride

While at home sitting on my lovely couch watching mindless television and movies, my dad interrupted my veg-out to tell me to read an article in the Boston Globe. Usually when my dad pulls out an article for me to read it means its definitely something I will connect to or need to know. I think he has a hard time talking to me about theatre sometimes and I find we can talk easier through these newspaper articles. Anyway, the article was titled"Boston theater's youth revival." I immediately thought it was about childrens theatre in boston - I've done some work with Boston Children's Theatre and had a great upbrining in a local childrens theatre program in my town.

It actually has to do with us college students! The article discusses how Boston is becoming a bigger hub for fresh out of college theatre students. Job opportunities are becoming more abundant. The interviewees and the author speak highly about a really creative and driven community of artists within the small city of boston -- a certain theatre culture is being developed. I think we can all attest to this outlook as we see our faculty members, alumni and even current students mixing up their theatre involvement's, finding more crossovers and connection. Our community at BU has a hand in a large amount of the theatre companies in the city and we are directly contributing to the growing culture as well. The article mentions our productions under the umbrella of Boston Center for American Performance (BCAP) which helps build bridges between professionals and developing undergraduates. The author states that there are simply more opportunities, and mostly lower budget/less commerical shows, for young actors and a larger range of difficulty and challenge in terms of role and playwright. From fridge to classic to experimental it seems like Boston is building up its rep for being a definite choice post graduation.

I read the article and felt proud of the city that I've  essentially grown up in. Being a local I feel a special connection to the city and always believed it had a thriving theatre scene. Attending college here, that speculation has grown tenfold. The amount of theatre for us to see is blown at our faces- there is always something new to see. Although, I feel I'm ready to venture out into a new city, with new buildings and a new subway system, and new theatres to attend...this article comforted me in knowing that I'm not only receiving fresh training from professional artists who continue to work and build a theatre community in Boston, but that I can always find a successful and fullfilling artistic/theatrical home back here in BeanTown.

What do you guys think about Boston's up and coming theatre scene? Any chance you'll be sticking around come graduation?

P.S. I came into the SoT office for work and I noticed one of our fabulous faculty members already posted this very article outside on the bulletin board... check it out there too!

Theatre Daedalus

Tonight was my final advanced playwriting class, and while I've been sad that Lydia has been in New York for a lot of the semester getting Stick Fly on its feet, we've had a FABULOUS co-/assistant/step-in teacher, Jaclyn Villano, an MFA candidate for Playwriting at the BPT. Jaclyn has her own theatre company, Theatre Daedalus, in Columbus, Ohio. Tonight, for our final class, we had a potluck. Tasty treats were passed around while we all gave progress reports on our plays that are due NEXT Monday. Jaclyn soothed us with her signature soft words of encouragement and level-headed, down-to-earth advice. Then came the surprise guest speakers: her partners, Jeremy Sonny and Michael Parsons from Theatre Daedalus. They came in to talk about their own experiences as actors/playwrights/directors/managers/theatre artists in "the real world." It was one of the most inspiring classes I've had all year. I feel as though a lot of my classes this year have been a little discouraging in terms of the reality of creating art outside of school. I.E. financing is too hard, competition is too fierce, boards of trustees are too closed-minded, etc. However, hearing Jaclyn, Michael, and Jeremy talk about their trip to Alaska to the Last Frontier Theatre Conference, their reasons for founding Daedalus, (Jaclyn laid it out on the line for us saying something along the lines of, "now we have this great theatre company with a mission statement we really believe in, but to start, let's be honest, we wanted to see our work produced and on stage.") and their artistic experiences as people working (hard) in the field was amazing. The two things that stuck with me were the importance of making a good first impression in the community and the value of our friends and classmates here at B.U. To speak to the first point, they reiterated a lot of the things we're taught here: be on time, be of use, leave your ego at the door, and be yourself. It was so encouraging to hear them tell us to just be ourselves and not try to be anything else. Secondly, the bit about looking around and realizing that the people I'm in voice and speech and dramaturgy and playwriting with are the people I'll be working with in 5-10-20 years. I never really stop to think about how much my peers inspire me and make me excited to do this work. What an excellent way to re-enter this world after Thanksgiving break...

Movement at the Mills

Last week I went to see The PGK Project dance company perform at the 'Movement at the Mills' dance series in the BCA's art gallery in the south end. It was a free performance!! In other words I was already on board. offering free dance theatre experiences to the public? Making dance accessible to the general public and not just those who can afford tickets? Sold. Although, on second thought, most people who are frequenting the South End could probably afford tickets anyway...but oh well. I walked in to a starkly white space with some minimalist art on the walls and dance Marley on the floor in specifically designated performance areas squared off with tape. I sat down and was amused by the fun, campy, "turn off your cell phones, enjoy the show" dance Introduction piece. I was excited to see my dance teacher in the show. The company incorporates local dancers from wherever they go into their shows, which I think is pretty cool, because, as the artistic director of the company said after the show, "We are all, as dancers, part of one dance family, regardless of stlye" I'm paraphrasing, but something along those lines.

Throughout the show, movement popped up everywhere, there were many different playing spaces all over the gallery. At first I was frustrated because I couldn't see all of the dances as people would move around the space to see better and then block my/everyone's view. But then I realized, ok, they had to have realized that this would happen, this is a purposeful part of the experience. After I let go of feeling like I had to see every movement I was able to enjoy the performance much more. The dancer's limbs that I could see became their own piece, for example, for one piece I could only see the performers hand for almost the whole time. It became an interesting study of hand isolations for me, the hand taking on its own character and story. I also started watching the audience watch the dances. usually I could see the audience better than the dancers, and their unison head movements as they watched the dance and nuanced reactions became their own, fascinating, could have been choreographed but probably wouldn't have been as great if it were, piece. I also was acutely aware of when a dancer was pursuing actions with their movement, versus just moving because the choreography tells them to. Some dancers had intentions and energy behind their movements while others did not. I found the ones who did have intention much more interesting to watch. in Physical acting we talk about how the difference between a physical action and a movement is intention. I saw how true this was in the PKG piece. I also felt that they were exploring themes of gender performativity. They paired people very creatively and specifically not adhering to hetero-normative/patriarchal gender roles. I was very moved by the show, the creative staging made me alert, I didn't know where the next dance was going to pop up around me. I left the theatre feeling that a dance could occur anywhere at any time on the street surrounding me. And metaphorically, I began to notice many small behavioral dances of the pedestrians I passed. I enjoyed the piece immensely and it was interesting for me when i heard that some people involved had not enjoyed the process and found it devoid of meaning. Apparently they had not gotten along with the artistic director very well. This just reminds me of how audience perception can be positive even if the process sometimes felt negative. Also of how easy it is to get wrapped up in negative working relationships and forget the larger whole where positive things can happen!

The Brothers and Sisters!

So, I have just come back from the FABULOUS Brother/ Sisters plays at Company One! Disclaimer, due to family engagements, I was only able to see the last two, The Brothers Size and Marcus today. However, hopefully I'll be able to see the first of the trilogy this week.

Alright, here we go. My first response coming away from the theatre, and sitting down to type, is that I was very moved. I had moments of elation, and moments where I hated the production. Yes! This is exciting stuff! The first of the two plays, The Brothers Size, started out with three young black men walking onstage chanting. Immeadiately my mind lept to slaves working in ryhthm. However, it quickly became apparent that the reference was only that, a reference; this play is set in a time with automobiles. Slavery is over, but it's clear that these men are still enslaved. What they're enslaved by starts to illuminate as the play progresses. I loved the choice to keep the repetition of the singing. The rhythm stayed constant, the song changed a bit time after time, but not significantly enough to become a new song. All I could think was how monotonously life was passing, as these men struggled with enormous matters of life and death.

However, I was lulled by some of this play's monotony. I know that often a second play in a series of three can be the "weaker" play. Based on responses by friends who had seen the first play, this seemed the case. However, in a format such as this, where an audience potentially hasn't seen play number one, play number two has to fight its hardest to keep from being the "slow" one. Starting my evening off with this even keeled play made me a little tired and fidgety. I was willing to cut the play some slack. It is gorgeously written, acted, and directed; I really don't know where the "slow" came from. But nontheless, I was getting bored. In the words of my theatre companion, "everything was so smooth. I wanted something, anything jagged!" I think that was a great assessment.

Then Marcus started. And I WOKE UP. This play made me bounce in my seat with excitement. From the moment it bangs out the door, in a funeral procession of all not exciting things, Marcus was full of vitality. The characters knew exactly when to call each other out. They lept on their fantasies like it was the last train out of town. The play zig zagged from front porch drama to musical number to seduction to betrayal. Every moment felt huge enough for such huge subject matter. This play (and The Brothers Size as well) is about the conflict of sexuality and family. Sure I can sum it up in a few words, but these are explosive topics. I think the reason I responded so enthusiastically to Marcus as opposed to The Brother's Size, was that Marcus was as big as its themes. Yes, I do want boas and divas! Yes, I do want showers onstage! Yes, I do want to hate that one character so much I could kick his scum bag ass through the back of the theatre!  Yes!!!! Marcus was such a great example of an ensemble rising to the enormous script with equally enormous enthusiasm.

Also, our lovely Hampton Fluker deserves a HUGE shoutout! Wow, I was blown away by his work. He commands the stage, transforms into two distinct characters, and gives these "professional" actors a run for their money. Awesome work Hampton!

Moral of the story, see these plays!!!! And I have purposely used that many exclamation points in this review. Yes, I am that enthusiastic.

Todd Haynes’ “Poison” (Watch it!)

Some of you may have already caught on that I am a huge film buff.  My favorite films are independent and experimental, portraying life as the artist sees and experiences it.  I also find myself especially moved by pictures made by queer filmmakers.  One film that I've recently watched for the second time is Poison. I was exposed to this film in a class taught by Jennie Livingston and when I first watched it, I didn't have much of an idea of what was going on and it made me EXTREMELY uncomfortable.  This is something that I find of the utmost importance in my development as an artist.  This film has changed my way of seeing.

Poison is a film written and directed by Todd Haynes, who is also known for creating "Velvet Goldmine," "I'm Not There," and "Superstar: The Karen Carpenter Story" (All of which I've seen, but have not moved me as deeply as Poison).  The film explores the writings of Jean Genet (who wrote the plays "The Balcony" and "The Maids" as well as the novel "Our Lady of The Flowers") through a contemporary, cinematic lens.  This translates into three sections that catapult Genet's world into the universes depicted in this 1991 film.   Haynes portrays homo-eroticism in the most sensual and horrifying ways, addresses the tragedies experienced by gay youth and alludes to the AIDS crisis using stark metaphors.   Three tales are presented that are completely contrasting in form, content and style, yet they seamlessly flow into one raucously disturbing experience.  Having seen Genet's Un Chant D'Amour (which I also highly recommend for viewing), I think Todd Haynes encapsulates the voice of Genet, yet honors the moment in which the film was conceived.  What means the most to me is that I am not able to watch the film without feeling.  I am on edge in the process of viewing this film, especially because, since the director and I are both queer, it is a world I feel like I know with both love and fear.

The film is available on Netflix for Instant Viewing now!  Also, I just watched Todd Haynes' 1994 short "Dottie Gets Spanked."  This is also an excellent film that deepens some of the explorations in "Poison" depicting the experience of young gay children.  I look to Todd Haynes for courage to share my voice as a queer artist without shame or censorship.

Programs for the Untalented and UnGifted

The reason why I was first intrigued by this article was the concept of how to determine who is “gifted and talented”. Not everyone has the same learning styles and I believe our nation’s view on the “gifted” is wildly askew. There are so many schools where classes in the arts are not required. Art  or chorus are classes you took in elementary school  and they seem to get just as much credit as recess does. And drama is never offered as a class but as an after school activity with no educational credit given.

I have been struggling with my own battle with the way our school systems work. The only way people believe you can be successful in life is if you go to a four year college/university. However, I know there are so many capable people out there who do not go to a four year college because of the way they were taught as a child. If there is a child who is a kinesthetic learner, they will not do well in school because they have not been taught the way they need to learn: through hands on experiences. Therefore, they will feel like they are dumb because they take longer to finish a test or write a paper. Because of this constant feeling of failure they will not even try and go to school because they have been told they are not the brightest crayon in the box their entire life.

However, the reality is that we do not take into account the different learning styles each individual child needs. I think every child has the potential for greatness, so it’s time we stop pushing them into the “dumb” classes or the “smart” classes. The real gift all children deserve is for educators to discover what learning style is best for each child and not put such emphasis on who is talented and untalented.

being green

100_8020 I am currently enrolled in a Production Management course where we have  to create our own theatre company and then develop our season. So  developing, developing, developing, thinking about the many shows I want  to include in my season, thinking about the budget, about the set, costumes,  props, staff, lights, and fog machines. In the beginning, I decided that I  wanted my theatre space to mirror that of a theatre venue in cleveland, Cain  Park. Cain Park’s main stage is a huge amphitheater which is a space I  really really enjoy, but as I looked back at my mission statement, the  description of my theatre, and the vision for Recess Theatre Company’s  theatre space, I realized that I wasn’t in love with any of them, they had  become stale and personally irrelevant. My idea didn’t fascinate me anymore  and it wasn’t the type of theater I really would have wanted to create years  down the road. So I began thinking again about what else was important to me in the world and how I could possibly incorporate that with my theater company. It struck me. I don’t remember how or why, but I shouldn’t have thought of it weeks ago. An sustainable theatre company. I realized that that was the kind of theater that I wanted, the one that would inspire me and challenge me. I thought the idea might be farfetched, so I started to do some research on it and I found so much information about green theatre projects and how to become a green theatre. One of the most interesting websites I found included this list about “50 Things You Can Do Towards Being a Green Theater”. Some of suggestions on the list were simple, like recycle bottles and cans, print on both sides of the paper, buy organic coffee for the lobby and so on and so forth. But some sounded more intricate like using soy ink when possible, installing light sensors, constructing the season around reusing the set, using non-toxic paint, and only using pump hairspray. A huge list of many options to start becoming more sustainable. They even had a Carbon Calculator to determine the carbon footprint of your own theatre company. I also found this Center for Sustainable Practice in the Arts that totally amazed me. I never knew there were so many efforts out there working towards a more environmentally friendly way of producing art.

On EcoTheater’s website, it had a break down of each element of the world of theater starting with the building. It began stating that “the buildings that house the performing arts may be the most detrimental to the environment of all. According to the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC), commercial buildings are responsible for 70% of the electricity load in the United States. Furthermore, the USGBC estimates that ‘if half of new commercial buildings were built to use 50% less energy, it would save over 6 million metric tons of CO2 annually for the life of the buildings—the equivalent of taking more than 1 million cars off the road every year.’” WOAH!!! This then raised the questions of how can we start to really spread the word and get this hypothesis about commercial buildings activated more worldwide? The article mentions later that a lot of these efforts towards sustainability are being put on hold because of the technology. How can we, the world, not be a detriment to our earth and begin trying to enforce these ecological ground-plans in our art? I’m beginning to understand that companies aiming towards becoming more sustainable have to go through a lot of trial and error in figuring out what is realistic and what is completely unfathomable. I’m not saying I want everyone and every theatre to drop everything and grab a flag to join the green revolution, but to start taking baby steps towards a better future: a future of our art and of our world.

Company Longetivity

Looking at the Guardian website, I found this article that immediately made me think about the state of the world at the moment. We're in a time when recessions are happening and we are struggling to fund the things that we've always taken advantage of. The arts have long been said to be losing money. Schools are struggling. So many more people are being laid off and unable to feed their families. In the Thanksgiving tradition, news stations have focused on local homeless shelters and the like where people come to volunteer and where others go to find shelter and a warm meal because they've lost their job. It makes me think about how we all hope to find employment in the world of theatre, but that isn't possible. So how do theatre companies survive all of these changes? Staying revelvant isn't always the most difficult part of the job; keeping audiences coming back is the problem. Funding is a huge issue companies of all sizes are facing. For companies that rely almost solely on subscriptions or things of a similar nature, they have to find a way to keep those people coming back and supporting them. Someone can always give you a new direction or idea in which to take a production, but how to do you know that it will keep your audience base coming back? That's the real testament as to whether or not a theatre company will continue to strive and thrive and survive this ever changing economy and population.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/stage/theatreblog/2011/nov/16/theatre-company-longevity-life

More on Marina Abramovic

Stuart wrote about the Marina Abramovic Mass MOCA scandale a week or so ago, in this post here.

There's been some interesting development since then. The performance artist who first wrote to Yvonne Rainer to alert her to Abromovic's demands on auditioners has outed herself, and posted about her experience. Read Sara Wookey's thought-provoking description here.

An excerpt:

I am writing to address three main points: One, to add my voice to the discourse around this event as an artist who was critical of the experience and decided to walk away, a voice which I feel has been absent thus far in the LA Times and New York Times coverage; Two, to clarify my identity as the informant about the conditions being asked of artists and make clear why I chose, up till now, to be anonymous in regards to my email to Yvonne Rainer; And three, to prompt a shift of thinking of cultural workers to consider, when either accepting or rejecting work of any kind, the short- and long-term impact of our personal choices on the entire field. Each point is to support my overriding interest in organizing and forming a union that secures labor standards and fair wages for fine and performing artists in Los Angeles and beyond.

I refused to participate as a performer because what I anticipated would be a few hours of creative labor, a meal, and the chance to network with like-minded colleagues turned out to be an unfairly remunerated job. I was expected to lie naked and speechless on a slowly rotating table, starting from before guests arrived and lasting until after they left (a total of nearly four hours. I was expected to ignore (by staying in what Abramović refers to as “performance mode”) any potential physical or verbal harassment while performing. I was expected to commit to fifteen hours of rehearsal time, and sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement stating that if I spoke to anyone about what happened in the audition I was liable for being sued by Bounce Events, Marketing, Inc., the event’s producer, for a sum of $1 million dollars plus attorney fees.

I was to be paid $150. During the audition, there was no mention of safeguards, signs, or signals for performers in distress, and when I asked about what protection would be provided I was told it could not be guaranteed. What I experienced as an auditionee for this work was extremely problematic, exploitative, and potentially abusive.

15moca-burrichter-slide-HT3M-jumbo

Photo via NYT article on the MOCA Event.

Let’s Talk BROOOOOAAAADWAAAAY!

So I'm currently kickin it in the Big Apple with MC Herzog.  It's pretty f-ing fun. (Disclaimer: She is also planning on writing about this show, so anticipate another post on this show.)

ONTO BUSINESS: She and I just saw Other Desert Cities by Jon Robin Baitz.  Overall it was a solid play...

First, some underdeveloped opinions:

  • Judith Light and Thomas Sadoski both gave outstanding performances.  They were simply fantastic.
  • I mostly disagreed with Rachel Griffiths.  Molls and I both thought that she was just too old for the role.  I was distracted by her playing younger.
  • For a play that has NOTHING to do with incest, there was too much intimate touching between siblings and father/daughter. Weird.

Now for the nitty gritty.  This play takes place in the mod living room of a Palm Springs home.  The set and lighting were perfect.  It was quintessentially Orange County with palm trees and a pool in the back yard and BRIGHT Californian sunshine.  As soon as the lights came up it was perfectly clear where we were.  And I have to say I loved it.  It wasn't until I saw this a few hours ago that I realized how seldom I see a show that is set on the west coast.  It had a very particular attitude, a very Californian attitude that I found refreshing.  It had a unique pace and such ease.  Also, the characters were endlessly intriguing.  They were all protagonists.  No one was wrong, everyone was justified.  That is what made the conflict so wrenching.  I didn't know who to side with because they were all fully formed people and their wants and needs were so clear.

Overall, very solid show, the script itself was very strong, and the perspective was refreshing.  Not perfect, but nothing is, really.

Molly and I are hitting up Stick Fly on Friday, so gear up for those posts.

PS to my peeps in Production Management:  they had a functional fireplace! It made me realize how much goddamn money they have in their budget.  It's no big thang to have a GIANT open flame onstage.  No biggy to fireproof friggin everything, and no biggy to hire two fire marshals every night for like a gajillion dollars.

Thoughts on Satyagraha

This past weekend, I attended an opera at the Met for the first time.

Let me get this out of the way: I am not an opera person. I have seen a few I've enjoyed (Jeune Lune's Carmen, for instance), and many more that have bored me to death. Some have enraged me with the lack of connection I felt, sitting in the audience, striving to be involved. I have also seen a fair number which have been good -- accomplished singing, imaginative staging, etc -- but have failed to move me. I often feel academic about opera. I appreciate it from a distance, at times I even like listening to pieces outside the context of the stage (Parsifal, for example), but it doesn't touch my soul. I've thought about this a lot, and I have decided that this is partially because I am deeply text focused, where there's text to be had. The operatic delivery is what trips me up -- I can rarely understand the words if they're in English, and if they're not, they don't feel deeply connected enough to the storytelling as I read along in supertitle. I recognize this is my own failing. I have a hard time releasing my desire for the libretto to give me more than it's designed to.

This is why I adore abstract opera -- operas like those by Robert Wilson, for example; like those by Philip Glass. These operas do away nearly entirely with the traditional role of text, and so I expect nothing. I am free to float through the images, the shape of the music -- the nature of "story" changes fundamentally.

I don't know why, but Philip Glass' music is the sound of my own soul. It resonates at the exact frequency of my heart strings. When I listen to it, I feel like it plays me, not the other way around. I first heard excerpts from Glass' opera Satyagraha as a child, from a compilation cassette tape my father played on the hifi every once in a while. I didn't hear it often, but it became so ingrained in my sense memory that when I rediscovered it as an adult, the first notes stopped me dead in my tracks. It was like I had been given the key to solve a mystery -- I finally identified the chain of notes that ricochet around my mind.

When I heard that the Met would be remounting the 2008 production of Satyagraha (a collaboration between the Met, the National Theatre, and Improbable Theatre Co), I bought two extravagantly expensive tickets before even checking with my better half. (For the record, my better half loves theatre, and mostly detests opera.)  This past Saturday, we found ourselves in red velvet seats, staring up at the crystal-bedecked sputnik chandeliers and the gold leaf ceiling, and I thought: "what have I gotten myself into? What am I doing in this high temple of opera?"

The house lights went dim, the orchestra came to attention -- but didn't play a single note. A man stood in the center of a raked stage, dressed as a young Ghandi. He opened his mouth and a clear note rang out, unaccompanied. By the time he got to the second note, I was full out weeping.

Weeping. Waterworks. Out of control, silent, unstoppable.

It was a shock -- the notes grabbed me, shook me, turned me inside out. I could not believe it was happening (and I still don't quite know how to process it), but I felt like in that moment, a tendon shot out from tenor Richard Croft across the abyss, penetrated my chest, and tethered me to the stage for the next 3+ hours. I don't think I've ever felt anything like it, and I've seen my share of art that moves me.

I could go on about the powerful use of puppetry; the smart design overall; the singularly arresting image of Martin Luther King Jr. atop a towering pulpit, Ghandi leaning against it below, head bowed, as the sky behind them both changed from roiling storm clouds to clear sky.... There's lots to say, and much to analyze. But for me, it was those first two notes that did me in, and made the rest simply the beautiful explication of a truth I had already comprehended.

What an utter and remarkable joy. I am on pins and needles for next year's multi-city  remount of Einstein on the Beach. 5 hours? You can have me for life.

A-scene-from-Satyagraha-b-001

Connecting the Dots: Yvonne Rainer in response to Marina Abramovic

For those of your who read my last post, I talked about the incredible work of Serbian, New York-based performance artist Marina Abramovic.  I felt a need to discuss her and her work after the fun website source I talked about earlier, Visual Therapy, posted photographs and information about a gala Marina artistically directed at MoCA.  Check the page out here: MOCA Gala Art // Marina Abramović.

I was looking at one of my dancer friend's facebook wall and was surprised to find she posted a link to an article about the recent gala.  The article is titled "Read Yvonne Rainer’s Final Letter Decrying Marina Abramovic’s MOCA Performance."  It's somewhat self explanatory, but to add some context, Yvonne Rainer is an extremely famous choreographer and experimental filmmaker, well-known for her post-modern work with the Judson Church in the 60's.  You may recall Ilana showing us Trio A, her most famous choreographic solo, in Modern drama.  One of my favorite films of all time, "Film About a Woman Who..." was made by Yvonne Rainer.  I only mean to express that I'm a great fan.

Reading this article took me by surprise and I'm still not quite sure how to feel.  Yvonne speaks about the work being grotesque and masochistic, with mostly white women poking their heads through tables to be greeted by inebriated bourgeoise patrons.  Something does feel wrong about this, but if the volunteers want to be participants, why should anyone stop them?  And in this article, Marina responds to say that her hope is that the energy of the room will be affected by the art.  Although I feel this may be true,  I am curious to what extent this will be so.  Nonetheless, I am interested in the experiment occurring.  Yet notable that an artist like Yvonne Rainer would not support this.  What does this say about her art?

An INCREDIBLE Night at the Symphony

Morris Robinson (here in a production of Wagner's 'Tannhauser'), one of the soloists in tonight's concert, bein' awesome.

Morris Robinson (here in a production of Wagner's 'Tannhauser'), one of the soloists in tonight's concert, bein' awesome.

I just got back to my apartment from Symphony Hall after seeing B.U.'s Symphony Orchestra and Symphonic Chorus present Arnold Schoenberg's A Survivor From Warsaw and Guiseppe Verdi's Requiem ("Messa da requiem"), and let me just say, HOLY SHIT. I've been feverishly listening to opera music and singing through all the Gioachino Rossini I can remember since the concert ended. But I'll stop doing that for a bit so i can tell you all how incredible the concert was, and a selection of the myriad of things about theatre and art I learned from it:

1) OH MY GOD, WAS IT EVER INCREDIBLE. The long-lost musician in me was brought back to life tonight. And the concert was definitely the most spectacular piece of art I've seen in a long time. For those of you who don't know about either of the pieces presented tonight, here's a clip of one of the most recognizable parts of the Requiem. So just imagine a huge orchestra, a quartet of opera singers, and a gigantic choir shouting that at you. Terrifying? Yes. Amazing? Fuck yeah.

2) WE ALL NEED TO GO SEE MORE SCHOOL OF MUSIC PERFORMANCES. Come to think of it, we all need to lend more support to both the Schools of Music and Visual Arts. I grant that none of us have any free time ever ever. But after seeing what the School of Music can do tonight, not only am I impressed by what they can do, but I am incredibly revitalized and inspired as a person in the arts. I'm thoroughly convinced that we all need to make time in our insane schedules to expose ourselves to art that isn't theatre - not only will we grow as artists, but we'll be inspired.

3) WANT ACTING LESSONS? WATCH OPERA SINGERS. Jesus Christ Almighty, you guys. The four soloists brought in to sing in Verdi's Requiem - whose further information you can find here - taught me a thing or two about performing tonight. Of course they were incredible singers, but as performers they were extraordinary. The four of them did things that I, as an actor/theatre artist/person, have been striving to learn how to do ever since I came here to school. But anyway, I think any of us actors/theatre artists/people could learn a thing or two from them. 'Cause they most definitely:

- Touched and moved people with their sound. About 2000 people. And gave me goosebumps.

- Owned their presence on stage, owned the stage, owned ever single thing they did.

- Apologized for nothing.

And, most inspirationally:

- Gave themselves completely to what they were doing. Honestly, it has been a long time since I've seen such artistic commitment in person. Watching the four of them sing, it was clear that every single molecule in them, every atom and neutron, was singing.

Please, everyone, go see the next opera-related anything you can! I promise you, you will be amazing at what you'll learn and what inspires you - not only as a theatre student or an actor, but as a person. I could definitely go on for ages about all the things I learned from tonight - including learning how deeply I miss music, opera, and singing, and how revitalizing it is for me as an artist (and learning that I do still want to be an opera singer. Badly).

I can only hope that, the next time I perform, I remember watching those four soloists and strive to do what they did - commit every fibre of my being to what I'm doing at that very moment. Why the fuck NOT?